Soyjak Wiki:Citation needed


Citation needed is a Soyjak Wiki template[it just is, ok?] and feature commonly used to signal unsubstantiated claims.[it just is, ok?]
It just is, ok?
[edit | edit source]"It just is, ok?" is a phrase that originated from mocking soyboys[it just did, okay?] and science lovers who instead of showing sources or investigating, they aggressively trust the science like seals[they just do, ok?]. However trannies and joon joons ran the phrase to the fucking ground by spamming "It just is, ok?" citations to anything they disagree with,[they just did, okay?] usually in statements that are universal truths or when there's evidence in the page already - doesn't matter; they will go "It just is, ok?" if they happen to not agree with you.[citation needed] Trannies on Xitter also use the phrase[they just do, okay?] in order to gaslight people when they are shown their own deadnames, proving again Robert Conquest's Law of Politics,[Marge...] in which right-wing cultural elements that parody trannies will eventually come back to trannies and be ruined.[you just did, okay?]
The reason it's so annoying is not because "you dont heckin' wanna comply with the rules" (even though the 'ki is not a soulless 100% unbiased 'pedia[it just is, ok?]). It is rather because:
- It is used in statements that don't need citations because these are already known facts and universal truths[it just is, ok?]
- It's used as subversive language to frame editors as liars by the subtle citation needed[it just is, ok?]
- It sounds so smug and condescending, removing the point of the phrase of mocking soyboys, and instead, used by unironic smug soyboys editing articles[they just do, okay?]
- It's used by janny-trannies who are too scared to disagree[we just do, ok?] and instead use the template[they just do, ok?]
Repeated pattern with Marge
[edit | edit source]See also: Marge
The same issue happens with [Marge...], although there's an entire article about it so I won't delve further.[I just won't, ok?]
