Talk:Chudpol.ru
adding site links
[edit source]the site isnt actually that hostile its just a Alive Aryan Elder. it would help with proper archival 258 (talk) 15:25, 29 May 2025 (EST)
- Appeantly it is indeed hostile since someone else got nished for it. Rip them I guess, they are an repeat ofender to. YOU VILL NOT DISCUSS THIS FURTHER
No deletion
[edit source]It might be DNB, hostile (due to woot being a pedo) and unmoderated but it was influential when it just appeared, with most of our /pol/ users using it. If you wanna find even more DNB and unmoderated splinter look no further than Sidty Soytanator (talk) 01:48, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Yes deletion
[edit source]Hostile fuggen jardee jartycuck shemmycuck splintercuck hostile offsiter splinter 'cord FNF FPE delete this! Please quote I NEED thiiiis! You es obsesed about mi o algo. Gooning to soytan and dnb es betar because mi content is more aryaner saar
Those who know the post numbers of CSAM posts and CSAM link posts and/or time when it was posted and was on main page please contact Internet Archive, archive ph and whatever other archive that has captured churro at that time so they can remove the archives --Gembaker (talk) 06:34, 16 December 2025 (UTC)
Uncensor the links to this?
[edit source]Both of the domains have been dead for a while, and with the owner getting 'oxed and raped a while ago and the chinny having 200 PPD it's sure as hell never coming back. Soyoyuki (talk) 00:24, 22 August 2026 (UTC)
- shit i care about @Gem @G-Man Soyoyuki (talk) 01:31, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- sure –Gem 💎 (talk) 01:40, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
- sure G-Man (talk) 01:51, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
