Namefag talk:Lunchfordinner
From Soyjak Wiki, the free ensoyclopedia
Latest comment: 8 September by Filobab in topic flip you cobblestone
can you guys stop deleting
[edit source]follow the janny policy and redirect or move it Cobblestone (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- It was marked for deletion for a day so I thought nobody disagreed, the manual of style says irrelevant nametroons can't get pages anyways. G-Man (talk) 01:01, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- People are REALLY misunderstanding the purpose and definition of the namefag article clause in the MoS. These are definitions from two administrations ago when the soysphere has grown beyond One Namefag Who Does Something And Then Gets A Genre Of Post Dedicated To Him Because He's 1 Out Of 10 Funny People On The Site.
- Who the fuck even cares about how relevant someone is? How about if someone is relevant enough to be able to be documented past three soyspeak-diluted sentences, wikihunkies and purpletards can fuck off and stop wiping pages. Seems like a good idea. --Funnybenny18 | Fuck you Wikisluts (Complain about my legible writing) 01:18, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- snca G-Man (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Very bold to call anything on this site SNCA as if anything would ever be worth SECA. Also my point is a very valid point so again we have a case of a wikiJESUS mentally going full power-effective at the sight of a well-constructed section of words. Keep to the templates and SPaG maintenance and we bluenames and chudgods can keep making 90% of the content of this site. Useless myopic janny --Funnybenny18 | Fuck you Wikisluts (Complain about my legible writing) 01:25, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Very bold to call anything on this site SNCA as if anything would ever be worth SECA. Also my point is a very valid point so again we have a case of a wikiJESUS mentally going full power-effective at the sight of a well-constructed section of words. Keep to the templates and SPaG maintenance and we bluenames and chudgods can keep making 90% of the content of this site. Useless myopic janny --Funnybenny18 | Fuck you Wikisluts (Complain about my legible writing) 01:25, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- snca G-Man (talk) 01:20, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Who the fuck even cares about how relevant someone is? How about if someone is relevant enough to be able to be documented past three soyspeak-diluted sentences, wikihunkies and purpletards can fuck off and stop wiping pages. Seems like a good idea. --Funnybenny18 | Fuck you Wikisluts (Complain about my legible writing) 01:18, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Gem @Soyoyuki can you deal with g-man Cobblestone (talk) 01:26, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Cobblestone I think most mods want to get rid of these irrelevant namefag articles, but we haven't laid terms for that yet. –Gem 💎 (talk) 09:21, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- @Gem @Soyoyuki can you deal with g-man Cobblestone (talk) 01:26, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
flip you cobblestone
[edit source]I dont think anybody missed when you could make wiki articles about literal whos because the sharty had nobody on it, we are too big for every namefag to have a useless stub article that will fall into disrepair or become useless when the nametroon inevitability gets banned or quits. If you decided to keep allowing this coal, atleast set something up where these pages are segregated or something so they dont turn the site into sncapedia or secapedia Filobab (talk) 12:56, 8 September 2026 (UTC)
literal who
[edit source]Literal who
