Samuel Davi Bariviera Raspini/List of PMs

• Samuel's ID was 97.

  

  
• Doll was 54.
• Root was 107.
• Froot was 108.

The rest are random jannies

ID	Time	Sender	Receiver	Message
984	2023-09-24 01:31:40	Samuel	127	wordswordswords test test test plz reply
986	2023-09-24 01:34:33	103	Samuel	>wordswordswords test test test plz reply Reply with quote Something like that yea
1005	2023-09-26 11:39:02	Samuel	71	Wordswordswords marge testing reply to this post or your mother will die in her sleep tonight
1006	2023-09-26 11:40:20	Samuel	root	>implying Soy-tan is 'cord Your passive aggressive autism will never catch on. >>>/soy/4819820/ (dunno if board links are made clickable yet, but you should know what I'm talking about)
1007	2023-09-26 12:34:55	71	Samuel	>Wordswordswords marge testing reply to this post or your mother will die in her sleep tonight Your message has been received
1008	2023-09-26 12:51:33	root	Samuel	>>implying Soy-tan is 'cord >Your passive aggressive autism will never catch on. >>>>/soy/4819820/ >(dunno if board links are made clickable yet, but you should know what I'm talking about) You can either continue insulting the manager and starting drama in my PMs or walk away. I don't care
1009	2023-09-26 15:16:49	Samuel	root	>>>implying Soy-tan is 'cord >>Your passive aggressive autism will never catch on. >>>>>/soy/4819820/ >>(dunno if board links are made clickable yet, but you should know what I'm talking about) >You can either continue insulting the manager and starting drama in my PMs or walk away. I don't care Eh, sorry. I didn't mean it like that. So you take janny PMs very seriously. You don't seem as laid back as you were on Telegram, which is a good thing. I'll be more /serious/ from now on.
1010	2023-09-26 15:45:58	root	Samuel	>Eh, sorry. I didn't mean it like that. So you take janny PMs very seriously. You don't seem as laid back as you were on Telegram, which is a good thing. I'll be more /serious/ from now on. I deal with enough ongoing drama from offsite discord groups, demoralizers, and frog pond spam. I will gladly be petty, passive aggressive, rude, unfair, whatever I want with them. They've long since forfeited respect and I'm having fun with it now. Either I have fun with these idiots or I quit, because if I was forced to be professional when dealing with children, I'd instead become a part time teacher's aide at an elementary school and at least get paid for it. You are correct, I will be serious with site staff from now on. All staff got too laid back in the telegrams and I don't like where it went. Apologies for misinterpreting the intent of your PMs.
1012	2023-09-27 16:39:33	Samuel	82	Asking for an assessment of me as a janny. What should I report/delete more, what should I report/delete less, how's my activity, etc.
1013	2023-09-27 23:03:17	Samuel	root	Someone is flooding reports
1014	2023-10-03 17:00:32	root	Samuel	The longer I manage this place, the more clear it becomes that /qa/ should be the main board; jakking just isn't as novel as it used to be and what is "on topic" for a soyjaks board? You were right.
1015	2023-10-03 19:14:09	Samuel	root	>The longer I manage this place, the more clear it becomes that /qa/ should be the main board; jakking just isn't as novel as it used to be and what is "on topic" for a soyjaks board? You were right. Oh no, please don't misunderstand. I want /qa/ to be the main board only so that /soy/ can be IAS-only. Hopefully then we would be able to revive the dying arts of soyquoting and soydueling, but that would likely demand a ban on selfinserting and no arrowing as well. Time would tell. How about a week-long NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/ event sometime this month to test the waters to finally make it permanent? The people do want it, remember Doll's poll? https://strawpoll.com/polls/1MnwOYMakn7/results
1016	2023-10-03 21:35:44	root	Samuel	Not much I can do about all the linespam you reported, as each one has a completely different IP and it's all 1 post from each IP. Also agreed about /qa/. Put it in front of soy and completely kill all NAS on /soy/.
1017	2023-10-03 21:40:15	Samuel	root	>Not much I can do about all the linespam you reported Well at least you can ban the IPs more effectively no? If I report every post instead of deleting them.
1018	2023-10-03 21:41:40	root	Samuel	He hops IPs the moment he posts one, so it does nothing. You're better off deleting them for now and report a just a few next time. Usually it's a range or from the same IP until one gets banned but this is operating like babybot
1019	2023-10-05 23:12:59	root	Samuel	pretty much everything goes in /nate/ except illegal content including loli/shota. so furry porn and any other porn can stay.
1020	2023-10-05 23:24:42	Samuel	root	>pretty much everything goes in /nate/ except illegal content including loli/shota. so furry porn and any other porn can stay. My mistake, but there was furry porn on /soy/ as well.
1021	2023-10-05 23:28:13	root	Samuel	>>pretty much everything goes in /nate/ except illegal content including loli/shota. so furry porn and any other porn can stay. >My mistake, but there was furry porn on /soy/ as well. Yeah that and even normal furry/pony on soy can be killed. They mostly know to stay in /qa/ but sometimes they get loose
1025	2023-10-07 00:31:40	root	Samuel	Idea: allowing/not killing avatarfagging on /qa/ to encourage people to post there more since we nuke and ban it on /soy/. Thoughts? It's the only place people consistently do it aside from gnuschizo in /sci/ whould should be shot on sight
1026	2023-10-07 00:48:34	Samuel	root	>Idea: allowing/not killing avatarfagging on /qa/ to encourage people to post there more since we nuke and ban it on /soy/. Thoughts? >It's the only place people consistently do it aside from gnuschizo in /sci/ whould should be shot on sight I'd be okay with allowing it since the rule probably wasn't enforced on 4chan's /qa/, but the thing is /qa/ is way too slow. They need some competition, so to speak. I'm still waiting for the /soy/-only bans…
1030	2023-10-09 22:53:25	90	Samuel	soor
1031	2023-10-09 22:54:29	Samuel	90	>soor Meds, meds meds meds
1032	2023-10-09 22:55:32	90	Samuel	kek, i was testing if that was your username since lee_clotson didn't work
1034	2023-10-10 11:28:43	Samuel	root	Thoughts on this thread, lad? https://soyjak.party/soy/thread/4986803.html Also I want to beg you once again to seriously consider making /soy/ IAS-only and enforce that by banning people from /soy/.
1035	2023-10-10 11:28:58	Samuel	froot	Thoughts on this thread, lad? https://soyjak.party/soy/thread/4986803.html Also I want to beg you once again to seriously consider making /soy/ IAS-only and enforce that by banning people from /soy/.
1036	2023-10-10 12:40:44	root	Samuel	This is a decision for Froot, and he has actually said that /soy/ is already intended to be IAS only. There is a new team helping to delete NAS on /soy/
1037	2023-10-10 12:50:53	froot	Samuel	>Thoughts on this thread, lad? >https://soyjak.party/soy/thread/4986803.html > >Also I want to beg you once again to seriously consider making /soy/ IAS-only and enforce that by banning people from /soy/. Mr clottson, i never opened that thread, too long for me to care, sorry i have neurons to keep stimmed and edged. And soy is IAS only
1038	2023-10-10 12:57:09	Samuel	froot	>Mr clottson, i never opened that thread, too long for me to care, sorry i have neurons to keep stimmed and edged. >And soy is IAS only Great, so when can we move on to 'nishing selfinserting and blogcoal?
1043	2023-10-10 23:24:49	froot	Samuel	>>Mr clottson, i never opened that thread, too long for me to care, sorry i have neurons to keep stimmed and edged. >>And soy is IAS only >Great, so when can we move on to 'nishing selfinserting and blogcoal? soon buddy, soon
1044	2023-10-12 12:58:37	71	Samuel	Soor change my diaper
1047	2023-10-12 14:43:15	Samuel	71	>Soor change my diaper Take ur meds or something like that or however the burger is flipped, yeah Anyway I want YOU to contribute to the Sharty vs Pepe trial here: https://soyjak.party/mod.php?/qa/thread/169343.html You VVILL comply. https://files.catbox.moe/s0wjy9.png
1049	2023-10-12 17:37:05	Samuel	71	Nevermind, this is the REAL Sharty vs. Pepe thread: https://soyjak.party/soy/thread/5004348.html
1050	2023-10-12 23:37:03	Samuel	root	Your honor! We're still waiting for your verdict on the Sharty vs. Frogposters case. Lots of allegations thrown wildly about. https://soyjak.party/mod.php?/soy/thread/5004348.html
1051	2023-10-13 00:09:22	root	Samuel	>Your honor! We're still waiting for your verdict on the Sharty vs. Frogposters case. Lots of allegations thrown wildly about. > >https://soyjak.party/mod.php?/soy/thread/5004348.html I have appeared
1064	2023-10-17 15:29:37	root	Samuel	upzellig
1082	2023-11-02 01:03:24	Samuel	root	>CP link clearly visible in the bans page https://CENSORED Fire the fucking retard who handed out this ban
1084	2023-11-02 03:13:05	root	Samuel	>>CP link clearly visible in the bans page >[https:/CENSORED https://CENSORED] >Fire the fucking retard who handed out this ban Pressing rule 1 is programmed to not display the offending contents, just like discord ban, but it appears adding additional text to the ban message changes this. I'll forward to the dev
1086	2023-11-04 00:31:14	Samuel	root	Please, margepill me on the Froot Defamation League and why I wasn't invited to participate in this program. From what I'm seeing it's the perfect fit for me.
1087	2023-11-04 01:31:07	root	Samuel	>Please, margepill me on the Froot Defamation League and why I wasn't invited to participate in this program. From what I'm seeing it's the perfect fit for me. The FDL was a few hand-picked Froot hires; it's possible he has their doxxes but I'm not sure. You can coal police in /soy/ like them if you wish
1088	2023-11-04 21:03:13	froot	Samuel	Hello lee, you're being a little nigger baby deleting threads on da kway that shouldnt be deleted (https://archive.soyjak.in/qa/thread/139158#p139158) (muh shrty quay culcha) Stop being a little nigger gay baby please or im gonna have to take some of your $0/hr and powers. Kind regards, orange fucker
1089	2023-11-04 21:37:10	Samuel	froot	>Hello lee, you're being a little nigger baby deleting threads on da kway that shouldnt be deleted (https://archive.soyjak.in/qa/thread/139158#p139158) (muh shrty quay culcha) B-but Root said it's okay to delete negrobumped threads if they've been negrobumped three or more times though! That's what I've been doing though. Do I get your blessing to continue?
1091	2023-11-05 20:34:38	froot	Samuel	>>Hello lee, you're being a little nigger baby deleting threads on da kway that shouldnt be deleted (https://archive.soyjak.in/qa/thread/139158#p139158) (muh shrty quay culcha) > >B-but Root said it's okay to delete negrobumped threads if they've been negrobumped three or more times though! That's what I've been doing though. >Do I get your blessing to continue? Nigga stop deleteing threads you dont like even if they have been aryanbumped 30 times. Its on da kway who gives a shit. root probably didnt mean it like that you niggerkikebaby.
1092	2023-11-05 22:39:17	Samuel	froot	>niggerbabble Nigger nigger nigger
1093	2023-11-05 22:58:35	froot	Samuel	>>niggerbabble >Nigger nigger nigger you are my favorite nigger baby
1094	2023-11-05 23:20:58	Samuel	root	Hello, have you changed your mind about deleting negrobumped threads? Froot is mad at me for doing it.
1095	2023-11-06 00:58:08	root	Samuel	>Hello, have you changed your mind about deleting negrobumped threads? Froot is mad at me for doing it. I recall saying something to the effect about threads that continued to be bumped after a day or so, mostly on /soy/. Yes, then, I walk it back, especially for slow boards where threads have a very long lifespan. I would like it if you focused your janitorial efforts on /soy/, where the most trouble goes on and is in need of a firm hand to keep things running smoothly.
1097	2023-11-06 20:51:25	Samuel	froot	>'cado is allowed ANYWHERE Arent you a braindead retarded stinky nigger asshole? He is NAS. You want him to stay up on /soy/? Why? That makes NO sense whatsoever considering /soy/ is allegedly IAS-only as per the rules. Goddamn I just hope Dool comes down hard and say "huh fuck froot" and deletes all your coalboards and shit like that and the website gets run exactly the opposite of how you want it to be or something like that, yeah.
1099	2023-11-07 12:25:03	froot	Samuel	>>'cado is allowed ANYWHERE >Arent you a braindead retarded stinky nigger asshole? He is NAS. You want him to stay up on /soy/? Why? That makes NO sense whatsoever considering /soy/ is allegedly IAS-only as per the rules. Goddamn I just hope Dool comes down hard and say "huh fuck froot" and deletes all your coalboards and shit like that and the website gets run exactly the opposite of how you want it to be or something like that, yeah. cry about it nigger this is my discord and you only have the newcomer role, keep talking in #general to get level 1 and unlock all the channels
1101	2023-11-09 11:16:37	Samuel	root	The Party is fucking dead! Not to doompost (or "demoralize", as sharteens would say), but as far as I can spit, nothing happened on the 3rd of November. Neither on the administrative side of things (we didn't get special names like we did last year) nor on the 'teen side. You said you'd pin a raid thread, yes? Well the /lgbt/ catalog looked intact. And stuff. Nothing happened!
1122	2023-11-13 13:44:34	Samuel	froot	Dear nigger lover, About self-inserting, blogposting, Poopson and Troongeleno's doxx. Let's start with Troongeleno's dox. I disliked Troongeleno but never wished this would happen, I hope it's a fake doxx. It's on the 'arms already and was allegedly done by the 'ord which makes it much, much worse. They want fame, don't they? I don't understand this mentality. I hope it's just a sick joke and they will come clean after it blows up in their faces. How can we clamp down on der 'ord more effectively and hold it accountable? Maybe this would sound hypocritical of you considering your pro-doxxing stance, but we must hecking avenge Troongeleno! On Poopson: I never liked Poopson. I'm sad to see this is the newest soyjak development. It's reddit-tier backroom-esque SCP-inspired garbage! You know I'm right! I could go on, and asking you to 'nish things I don't like is pitiful, even considering that it's not blogcoal nor self-insertion. But I wanted to ask to restrict some of it through the anti-spam rule, rule 4. At the time I'm typing this, page 1 is filled with Poopson. I don't see what 'teens find so funny or interesting. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy: People chase it and only coal comes out of it. Soon enough though, it will die out. Lastly, blogposts and selfinsertion. I admit, it's a little embarassing, that I have blogcoaled and selfinserted a little. I believe it's okay in moderation, when it's tasteful (and I'm not saying this in a "rules for me but not for thee" manner, I really mean that. I have never used neutralplier as a selfinsert, for example. And by "tasteful' I mean when you make fun of yourself for acting like a soyboy, you know? For example, by asking dumb rhetorical questions or revealing something very embarassing about yourself. You know what I'm talking about. Also, I've kept my blogcoal outside of /soy/.) But neutralplier tier selfinsertion is: "Me me me! I am the king of /soy/ and I have a great life, listen to my problems!" You also know what I'm talking about. These have little to no value to /soy/. I'm really glad you're thinking about banning blogcoals and self-insertion from /soy/ though. Just wanted to give you an extra little nudge in the right direction. As always, I'm willing to hear your opinion on this. I'm not saying you must agree with me. I would like to hear how I could improve as a janny and whether my opinions on how to improve the Party are good. I'd also love to gain permission to move threads, y'know?
1123	2023-11-13 13:47:08	Samuel	root	Dear nigger lover, About self-inserting, blogposting, Poopson and Troongeleno's doxx. Let's start with Troongeleno's dox. I disliked Troongeleno but never wished this would happen, I hope it's a fake doxx. It's on the 'arms already and was allegedly done by the 'ord which makes it much, much worse. They want fame, don't they? I don't understand this mentality. I hope it's just a sick joke and they will come clean after it blows up in their faces. How can we clamp down on der 'ord more effectively and hold it accountable? On Poopson: I never liked Poopson. I'm sad to see this is the newest soyjak development. It's reddit-tier backroom-esque SCP-inspired garbage! You know I'm right! I could go on, and asking you to 'nish things I don't like is pitiful, even considering that it's not blogcoal nor self-insertion. But I wanted to ask to restrict some of it through the anti-spam rule, rule 4. At the time I'm typing this, page 1 is filled with Poopson. I don't see what 'teens find so funny or interesting. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy: People chase it and only coal comes out of it. Soon enough though, it will die out. Lastly, blogposts and selfinsertion. I admit, it's a little embarassing, that I have blogcoaled and selfinserted a little. I believe it's okay in moderation, when it's tasteful (and I'm not saying this in a "rules for me but not for thee" manner, I really mean that. I have never used neutralplier as a selfinsert, for example. And by "tasteful' I mean when you make fun of yourself for acting like a soyboy, you know? For example, by asking dumb rhetorical questions or revealing something very embarassing about yourself. You know what I'm talking about. Also, I've kept my blogcoal outside of /soy/.) But neutralplier tier selfinsertion is: "Me me me! I am the king of /soy/ and I have a great life, listen to my problems!" You also know what I'm talking about. These have little to no value to /soy/. As always, I'm willing to hear your opinion on this. I'm not saying you must agree with me. I would like to hear how I could improve as a janny and whether my opinions on how to improve the Party are good. I'd also love to gain permission to move threads, y'know?
1124	2023-11-13 14:39:14	root	Samuel	>Dear nigger lover, > >About self-inserting, blogposting, Poopson and Troongeleno's doxx. > >Let's start with Troongeleno's dox. I disliked Troongeleno but never wished this would happen, I hope it's a fake doxx. It's on the 'arms already and was allegedly done by the 'ord which makes it much, much worse. They want fame, don't they? I don't understand this mentality. I hope it's just a sick joke and they will come clean after it blows up in their faces. How can we clamp down on der 'ord more effectively and hold it accountable? This is being handled by the admins, and I appreciate for your concern. > >On Poopson: I never liked Poopson. I'm sad to see this is the newest soyjak development. It's reddit-tier backroom-esque SCP-inspired garbage! You know I'm right! I could go on, and asking you to 'nish things I don't like is pitiful, even considering that it's not blogcoal nor self-insertion. But I wanted to ask to restrict some of it through the anti-spam rule, rule 4. At the time I'm typing this, page 1 is filled with Poopson. I don't see what 'teens find so funny or interesting. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy: People chase it and only coal comes out of it. Soon enough though, it will die out. You can delete poopson spam especially if it's the "jaks" without human source traces which are essentially /qa/ characters like catjak. You can also delete nonsensical brown troonjak spam which I think is a bot at this point > >Lastly, blogposts and selfinsertion. I admit, it's a little embarassing, that I have blogcoaled and selfinserted a little. I believe it's okay in moderation, when it's tasteful (and I'm not saying this in a "rules for me but not for thee" manner, I really mean that. I have never used neutralplier as a selfinsert, for example. And by "tasteful' I mean when you make fun of yourself for acting like a soyboy, you know? For example, by asking dumb rhetorical questions or revealing something very embarassing about yourself. You know what I'm talking about. Also, I've kept my blogcoal outside of /soy/.) But neutralplier tier selfinsertion is: "Me me me! I am the king of /soy/ and I have a great life, listen to my problems!" You also know what I'm talking about. These have little to no value to /soy/. You can mark blogposts and relationship posts to be moved to /plier/ or /r9k/. I've asked froot to add these to the top bar wirh no avail, maybe I'll have to wait until Doll returns. A neutralplier with a low effort one sentence personal statement like his clitty twitching can be deleted, and those are often spammed in succession > >As always, I'm willing to hear your opinion on this. I'm not saying you must agree with me. I would like to hear how I could improve as a janny and whether my opinions on how to improve the Party are good. I'd also love to gain permission to move threads, y'know? I'll consider giving you move perms in the near future, but you'd have to be lenient with it: there's a difference between a thread being an irrelevant blogpost and a 'teen asking a personal question without an arrow, and there's a case where moving an active request thread could hinder the request actively being fulfilled. Human jannies have the nuance that a bot doesn't, and we'd just code a move bot if we wanted every request ever to be moved to /r/ indiscriminately.
1138	2023-11-14 21:45:18	114	Samuel	Hey LeeMann, just wanted to say I love your efforts.keep it up. our special powerjannyLORD.
1142	2023-11-14 21:58:14	Samuel	114	>Hey LeeMann, just wanted to say I love your efforts.keep it up. our special powerjannyLORD. Thanks. Lee Gemson is an inspiration. Are you a mod or something though? I kind of want to be one as well and I kind of don't. It's frustrating not being able to ban, move threads and stuff, but it's too much responsibility. Also, I will have a lot less time to janny it up starting next year, because, oh you know, uni. Currently though I'm a NEET and a sperg and that's what explains my availability and passion. I'm sure I won't grow tired of jannying it or of basedjaks anytime soon THOUGH.
1143	2023-11-14 22:16:39	114	Samuel	>are you a mod? you can say that. im the one who's banning whatever you reported in the last 5 hours. >it's too much responsibility I assure you it's not as hard as it seems. >I will have a lot less time to janny it up das alright, this is freework anyway >sperg idk if im one,I never got "diagnosed" but I guess since im here most of the time I guess im one of you idk,anyway quick tip, be less trigger happy about for example wanting to move every thread that asks for something to r. and something music related to move to mtv. talk to you later
1152	2023-11-15 22:41:00	Samuel	114	>>are you a mod? >you can say that Wdym? Is there something in between janny and mod that I don't know about? >>it's too much responsibility >I assure you it's not as hard as it seems. Erm, care to elaborate? Isn't there a lot of pressure to make the right calls as well? >>sperg >idk if im one,I never got "diagnosed" but I guess since im here most of the time I guess im one of you I sure hope not! I'm deeply ashamed of being one. And stuff. Wouldn't wanna bore you with this personal crap. >be less trigger happy about for example wanting to move every thread that asks for something to r. and something music related to move to mtv. I still feel like that's the right thing to do though, y'know? "jak and music" threads really are a better fit to /mtv/ than /soy/ even if /soy/ doesn't have a set topic. Same with "'jak him" threads. By moving these threads it gives the boards meaning, y'know?
1156	2023-11-16 17:17:39	Samuel	root	https://files.catbox.moe/mvb97p.png The image speaks for itself.
1158	2023-11-16 19:13:47	root	Samuel	>https://files.catbox.moe/mvb97p.png > >The image speaks for itself. you can criticize the mod team without making your post a jarty ad. that was my temp ban :)
1159	2023-11-16 19:41:41	Samuel	root	>>https://files.catbox.moe/mvb97p.png >you can criticize the mod team without making your post a jarty ad. that was my temp ban :) Oh no I mean you should tell the moddies to generally avoid adding text to ban reasons because it exposes the contents of the rulebreaking post (we've had incidents like this before but with 'p links rather than jarty, y'know). And especially not include "jarty" in the ban reason if you must add extra text. Mods mentioning the jarty in a ban reason is a new low.
1161	2023-11-16 20:04:13	root	Samuel	>>>https://files.catbox.moe/mvb97p.png > >>you can criticize the mod team without making your post a jarty ad. that was my temp ban :) >Oh no I mean you should tell the moddies to generally avoid adding text to ban reasons because it exposes the contents of the rulebreaking post (we've had incidents like this before but with 'p links rather than jarty, y'know). And especially not include "jarty" in the ban reason if you must add extra text. > >Mods mentioning the jarty in a ban reason is a new low. That’s a good point. We'll take that moving forward
1162	2023-11-16 21:24:43	114	Samuel	>Wdym? Is there something in between janny and mod that I don't know about? meds >>I assure you it's not as hard as it seems. sure, but not as colossal >I sure hope not! I'm deeply ashamed of being one. And stuff. Wouldn't wanna bore you with this personal crap. iss alright > >I still feel like that's the right thing to do though, y'know? "jak and music" threads really are a better fit to /mtv/ than /soy/ even if /soy/ doesn't have a set topic. Same with "'jak him" threads. By moving these threads it gives the boards meaning, y'know? see what happened today, and take a look at /q/. they only grow angrier. but that shouldnt matter,most of em are pissbabies who just parrot each other.proof?say something that doesnt lign 100 percent with them, and they ll call you a janny suck up
1163	2023-11-16 21:28:38	Samuel	114	>>I still feel like that's the right thing to do though, y'know? "jak and music" threads really are a better fit to /mtv/ than /soy/ even if /soy/ doesn't have a set topic. Same with "'jak him" threads. By moving these threads it gives the boards meaning, y'know? >see what happened today, and take a look at /q/. they only grow angrier. but that shouldnt matter,most of em are pissbabies who just parrot each other.proof?say something that doesnt lign 100 percent with them, and they ll call you a janny suck up If it were up to me I'd fucking lock /soy/ for a week. They may get angry, so what? They get angry at everything, and even if push comes to shove and they leave the site, good, that's one less coaler. Froot has said that we're already larger than the sweet spot for an imageboard anyway. They don't know what's best for the site, or what's best for them. They don't even know what they want.
1164	2023-11-16 21:46:10	114	Samuel	LEENVKE
1165	2023-11-16 21:52:24	Samuel	114	>NVKE Bantroon slang (or so I've been told) wouldn't reccomend using
1166	2023-11-16 21:56:50	114	Samuel	>>NVKE >Bantroon slang (or so I've been told) wouldn't reccomend using the arty system will always be corrupted as long as cado is allowed
1167	2023-11-16 22:02:07	Samuel	114	>the arty will always be corrupted as long as cado is allowed Agreed, but I don't want a total ban on 'cado, just permission to delete him from /soy/. IAS board.
1168	2023-11-16 22:37:36	114	Samuel	>>the arty will always be corrupted as long as cado is allowed >Agreed, but I don't want a total ban on 'cado, just permission to delete him from /soy/. IAS board. i want all cado nsfw to be removed, my wish is simple
1169	2023-11-16 22:43:21	Samuel	114	>i want all cado nsfw to be removed, my wish is simple I don't think that's gonna be possible though, not that I'm against it, considering gore and other NSFW stuff are freely allowed and would continue to be
1170	2023-11-16 22:49:03	114	Samuel	>I don't think that's gonna be possible though, not that I'm against it, considering gore and other NSFW stuff are freely allowed and would continue to be The real lesson is that irony isn't real. If you meme something to make fun of someone else, your brain will not understand what you are doing, and will program you to unironically enjoy the thing you are memeing. Think about the weirdoes who spam images and videos of niggers pooping, of Nikocado Avocado's dirty asshole, they actually like that stuff. You can't "ironically" save videos of men's assholes pushing out shit to your computer hardrive
1176	2023-11-17 02:20:05	froot	Samuel	>Dear nigger lover, > >About self-inserting, blogposting, Poopson and Troongeleno's doxx. > >Let's start with Troongeleno's dox. I disliked Troongeleno but never wished this would happen, I hope it's a fake doxx. It's on the 'arms already and was allegedly done by the 'ord which makes it much, much worse. They want fame, don't they? I don't understand this mentality. I hope it's just a sick joke and they will come clean after it blows up in their faces. How can we clamp down on der 'ord more effectively and hold it accountable? Maybe this would sound hypocritical of you considering your pro-doxxing stance, but we must hecking avenge Troongeleno! > >On Poopson: I never liked Poopson. I'm sad to see this is the newest soyjak development. It's reddit-tier backroom-esque SCP-inspired garbage! You know I'm right! I could go on, and asking you to 'nish things I don't like is pitiful, even considering that it's not blogcoal nor self-insertion. But I wanted to ask to restrict some of it through the anti-spam rule, rule 4. At the time I'm typing this, page 1 is filled with Poopson. I don't see what 'teens find so funny or interesting. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy: People chase it and only coal comes out of it. Soon enough though, it will die out. > >Lastly, blogposts and selfinsertion. I admit, it's a little embarassing, that I have blogcoaled and selfinserted a little. I believe it's okay in moderation, when it's tasteful (and I'm not saying this in a "rules for me but not for thee" manner, I really mean that. I have never used neutralplier as a selfinsert, for example. And by "tasteful' I mean when you make fun of yourself for acting like a soyboy, you know? For example, by asking dumb rhetorical questions or revealing something very embarassing about yourself. You know what I'm talking about. Also, I've kept my blogcoal outside of /soy/.) But neutralplier tier selfinsertion is: "Me me me! I am the king of /soy/ and I have a great life, listen to my problems!" You also know what I'm talking about. These have little to no value to /soy/. I'm really glad you're thinking about banning blogcoals and self-insertion from /soy/ though. Just wanted to give you an extra little nudge in the right direction. > >As always, I'm willing to hear your opinion on this. I'm not saying you must agree with me. I would like to hear how I could improve as a janny and whether my opinions on how to improve the Party are good. I'd also love to gain permission to move threads, y'know? First on STRAIGHTgeleno's doxx, most of it is fake, i have Angelenos full legal info and even current residence for legal reasons, I can confirm most of it is fake, besides some irrelevant shit that no one cares about. About DA COOOOOORD, half the admins are already under my control and leak anything to me before it happens, thats why you dont see any succesful raids from them. And they are really bad at doxxing anyways. I have admins/mods in all the popular sharty 'cords. And selfinsertGODS and blogCHADS, I agree its a bit excessive sometimes but it can be gemmy, i blogbait and self insert too sometimes, its funny. But yes I agree its hard to clamp down on it without going all the way "no fun allowed". and about poopson, its a niggerstone 'ikitard autist injoke that somehow spread out and no one should or will care about in a month.
1178	2023-11-17 20:02:26	Samuel	114	Let's talk about what we would do to improve the Party. I for one would move every single NAS thread on /soy/ to other boards. Strict NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/. I would also move blogposting and coally selfinsertions on /soy/ to other boards. I would also hide sage on every board. Speaking of /qa/, I would emulate the constraints of 4chan. Namely 10 min cooldown between threads, 60s cooldown between posts, bump limit at 300, 2k character limit, all just like /qa/. (All this on /soy/ and /qa/ though, dunno about the other boards.) Speaking of other boards, I would remove every coalboard (though /clash/ could wait until the event is over), leaving us with [q / qa / soy / r / raid] [x / bant* / mtv / sci]. *merger of /int/ and /pol/ I made a post on the 'arms defending this arrangement. Poster IDs on /q/ and /bant/. Flags only on /bant/. Making /qa/ the main board (somehow). Thoughts, lad?
1179	2023-11-17 20:03:32	Samuel	71	Let's talk about what we would do to improve the Party. You probably have been exposed to most of these firm beliefs I hold back on the 'gram, but whatever, please consider them again. I for one would move every single NAS thread on /soy/ to other boards. Strict NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/. I would also move blogposting and coally selfinsertions on /soy/ to other boards. I would also hide sage on every board. Speaking of /qa/, I would emulate the constraints of 4chan. Namely 10 min cooldown between threads, 60s cooldown between posts, bump limit at 300, 2k character limit, all just like /qa/. (All this on /soy/ and /qa/ though, dunno about the other boards.) Speaking of other boards, I would remove every coalboard (though /clash/ could wait until the event is over), leaving us with [q / qa / soy / r / raid] [x / bant* / mtv / sci]. *merger of /int/ and /pol/ I made a post on the 'arms defending this arrangement. Poster IDs on /q/ and /bant/. Flags only on /bant/. Making /qa/ the main board (somehow). Thoughts, lad?
1180	2023-11-18 14:57:32	114	Samuel	I did read your post on kiwifarms and I love it.howeverdoebeit it's not up to me, not even rooty kins.
1181	2023-11-18 15:30:45	Samuel	114	>I did read your post on kiwifarms and I love it.howeverdoebeit it's not up to me, not even rooty kins. We could start an ebin conspiracy to come up with le arguments to convince Froot thoughevertheless
1182	2023-11-18 21:17:46	114	Samuel	>We could start an ebin conspiracy to come up with le arguments to convince Froot thoughevertheless meds, she can read PMs
1185	2023-11-19 15:41:21	Samuel	114	>>We could start an ebin conspiracy to come up with le arguments to convince Froot thoughevertheless >meds, he can read PMs Sounds like an epic waste of time, I think we can still conspire
1186	2023-11-19 16:05:20	114	Samuel	>Sounds like an epic waste of time, I think we can still conspire sure whatever
1189	2023-11-19 16:56:37	Samuel	114	>>Sounds like an epic waste of time, I think we can still conspire >sure whatever Incredible, alright, so what arguments could we come up with to complement my kiwifarms post?
1190	2023-11-19 17:18:56	114	Samuel	>Incredible, alright, so what arguments could we come up with to complement my kiwifarms post? https://files.catbox.moe/7eun2f.png geg
1191	2023-11-19 17:34:33	Samuel	114	>https://files.catbox.moe/7eun2f.png >geg >doesn't elaborate What a nigger, didn't even comment on each of them! C'moon, how can post IDs on /q/ be a bad thing? And I thought Root had previously agreed with me on making /qa/ the main board? And stuff!
1193	2023-11-19 18:15:54	114	Samuel	>What a nigger, didn't even comment on each of them! C'moon, how can post IDs on /q/ be a bad thing? And I thought Root had previously agreed with me on making /qa/ the main board? And stuff! he does elaborate, i just cherry picked it. https://files.catbox.moe/2ir83u.png https://files.catbox.moe/ht2cv4.png
1194	2023-11-19 20:01:10	Samuel	114	>he does elaborate, i just cherry picked it. >https://files.catbox.moe/2ir83u.png >https://files.catbox.moe/ht2cv4.png I can't tell who's who in those images, but whatever or something. I don't think that /qa/ needs to be purged of fandomtroons, just that we need to dilute them with more activity which would be achieved by making /qa/ the main board. Now, how to make /qa/ the main board? That's a head scratcher. I thought of locking /soy/ for a week even if that'd be vastly unpopular. That's the only soylution I can come up with. Same with tranime, since they wouldn't have /a/ anymore. Their new homes would be /mtv/ and /qa/. Old school /qa/ had plenty of tranime in it.
1195	2023-11-19 21:17:01	114	Samuel	I love your ideas.but I dont think there is currently any plan anyway to "improve" the arty ill give it a rest if i were you.
1196	2023-11-20 15:52:30	71	Samuel	>Let's talk about what we would do to improve the Party. You probably have been exposed to most of these firm beliefs I hold back on the 'gram, but whatever, please consider them again. > >I for one would move every single NAS thread on /soy/ to other boards. Strict NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/. > >I would also move blogposting and coally selfinsertions on /soy/ to other boards. > >I would also hide sage on every board. > >Speaking of /qa/, I would emulate the constraints of 4chan. Namely 10 min cooldown between threads, 60s cooldown between posts, bump limit at 300, 2k character limit, all just like /qa/. >(All this on /soy/ and /qa/ though, dunno about the other boards.) > >Speaking of other boards, I would remove every coalboard (though /clash/ could wait until the event is over), leaving us with [q / qa / soy / r / raid] [x / bant* / mtv / sci]. >*merger of /int/ and /pol/ >I made a post on the 'arms defending this arrangement. > >Poster IDs on /q/ and /bant/. Flags only on /bant/. > >Making /qa/ the main board (somehow). > >Thoughts, lad? Making qa the main board isn’t a good idea, we’re a separate thing from 4chan and thats a good thing
1197	2023-11-20 17:33:08	Samuel	froot	Oh my AIDS is it true that Kuz is now a janny or whatever?? I saw one suspicious thread and found that there is indeed a janny account for Kuz
1198	2023-11-20 18:33:16	froot	Samuel	>Oh my AIDS is it true that Kuz is now a janny or whatever?? I saw one suspicious thread and found that there is indeed a janny account for Kuz his janny account has no perms and the password was changed, ill delete it rn, forgot to do it
1199	2023-11-22 13:54:50	Samuel	froot	Dear nigger lover, I realize that I'm still too new a janny, inexperienced, irresponsible and one who could janny harder, too, to be given mod powers, but I'd like to request the ability to move threads if possible. Y'see, I'm not a fan of deleting threads outright, and I'd be your best soldier in enforcing the NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/ rule by moving it all to /qa/ instead of reporting the posts I'd like to see moved. — Notice that I reported dozens of threads in /tct/ earlier today. Though I hate this board and wish you'd deleete it alongside every other coalboard (leaving us with q/qa/soy/raid/r/x/mtv/bant/sci, also I promise I would patrol each one of them daily if this does happen), I still want it to be on-topic. Notice that I can't interact with posts in /tct/ or /art/, much like /q/, you forgot to give jannies janny perms. So fix that. — I'd also like to PLEAD for you to lock /soy/ for a week even though most posters would flock to /qa/ anyway! This would solve several problems at once: It'd dilute the /co/omer offsiter population in /qa/ with jakkers (like God intended), it would also be a way to bring attention and show endorsement to the other boards and it would let jannies enforce NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/ more effectively. "Duurr cultural thing we can't change" why are you such a pussy! Do it! Even if it'd be unpopular! The people are retarded, they don't know what's best for them!
1202	2023-11-22 17:45:21	root	Samuel	Dear lee clottson / nu-lee, Anyone under manager is not to post in the /soy/ sticky, even if it's an inoffensive board ad like you made. Froot says he'll rape you next time I have to PM you, so for your health I recommend refraining from such tomfoolery. >But the FDL! Froot has them on a tight leash, don't worry. They seem to like you too. ROOT
1203	2023-11-22 18:24:48	Samuel	root	I notice your account is no longer named deveil? Cool. >Anyone under manager is not to post in the /soy/ sticky Bah, then how come I'm able to do so? Isn't there a way to have it so mods and jannies are unable to do it? Get the codemonkeys on it Also, that's two warnings now, I'm sweating bullets! One for deleting a negrobump thread on /qa/ and now this! I hope this doesn't mean we run on a "three strikes and you're out" system. How do I get Froot to put up with more of my eventual mistakes?! Furthermore, >>But the FDL! Marge, do you mean that one time a janny posted something in the sticky three times and (I presume) got relieved of his duties as janitor? >They seem to like you too. On what grounds do you make this claim, hmm? And if so, how come noone has sent me PMs save for Gapeson? Who I don't know for sure is a regular mod or FDL. — Also, I need your help with something. 'p links got posted earlier today and I decided to delete them instead of waiting until a mod comes online to verify the link and ban and do the legal stuff. Is that the right course of action?
1204	2023-11-22 19:28:04	root	Samuel	>I notice your account is no longer named deveil? Cool. Yes, easier for the new yuro jannies PM me and makes more sense. >Bah, then how come I'm able to do so? Isn't there a way to have it so mods and jannies are unable to do it? Get the codemonkeys on it You have the ability to because somehow this was never an issue for 3 years of Sharty existing (which is hard to believe). Were jannies just better well-behaved then? I asked about it and apparently it is a mod.php gets to post in locked threads thing, and not per account level. >How do I get Froot to put up with more of my eventual mistakes?! By just jannying and eating the bugs and being happy. The more frequent the drama with a janny, the better chance they're going to get the boot. If I go 3 months without hearing drama about a janny who had 2 strikes a long time ago, it's not like they're instantly getting fired on #3 unless it was very bad. >Marge, do you mean that one time a janny posted something in the sticky three times and (I presume) got relieved of his duties as janitor? This was a Froot call. >On what grounds do you make this claim, hmm? And if so, how come noone has sent me PMs save for Gapeson? Who I don't know for sure is a regular mod or FDL. Dunno, they're just doing their job or being too busy stealth attentionwhoring. >Also, I need your help with something. 'p links got posted earlier today and I decided to delete them instead of waiting until a mod comes online to verify the link and ban and do the legal stuff. Is that the right course of action? Correct. Shady looking links, especially ones paired with illegal image, should always be deleted immediately. Anybody posting 'p links isn't using their own residential IP which would be worth banning, or it's a bot.
1205	2023-11-23 00:36:14	Samuel	froot	Funny how publicly banning me for "derailing" led to neutralniggers to flood the designated fnacoal thread ironically derailing it more so I just memoryholed that post
1206	2023-11-23 00:57:54	froot	Samuel	>Funny how publicly banning me for "derailing" led to neutralniggers to flood the designated fnacoal thread ironically derailing it more so I just memoryholed that post marge idk what ur yapping on about.
1207	2023-11-23 11:48:02	Samuel	froot	>>Funny how publicly banning me for "derailing" led to neutralniggers to flood the designated fnacoal thread ironically derailing it more so I just memoryholed that post >marge idk what ur yapping on about. Then it must've been someone else who did it, nevermind, also if you could reply to my other PM that'd be nice.
1208	2023-11-24 18:32:35	root	Samuel	Jannies aren't auto-added to boards when they're created and you've been doing worthwhile reporting on /tct/. I asked the admins to add that board to your list so you can keep it on topic or delete nonsense
1216	2023-11-25 19:59:56	Samuel	root	Now that I've found the archive of my Coaltalogue blogposts, I want you to read them: [/qa/thread/205523.html#205523 >>>/qa/205523] That really shows how much effort I've put into the sommunity and proves that my current opinions about making /qa/ the main board and being opposed to selfinserters and stuff are opinions I've held for at least several months! I deserve to be taken more seriously!
1217	2023-11-25 20:15:52	root	Samuel	Oh those posts were you, huh. I always thought they were a gemmy part of /qa/, even if I didn't really read the entire things because I just rarely read any blogposts or schizo-rants. I read the whole opening post and agree. I do take you (along with this job) seriously. You willingly put more thought into the site and solutions than any of the jannies and mods. If I was ever made admin (hopefully never, God willing), I might choose you as manager because your autism weaponized would do wonders to instill order. As it currently is, I am not the admin, and I have neither the power or the perms to make drastic site-wide decisions and changes. So it may be fruitless to propose any changes to me as my only real power is deciding what the jannies do or don't do (and ensuring they follow suit).
1218	2023-11-25 20:22:44	Samuel	root	>I always thought they were a gemmy part of /qa/. You willingly put more thought into the site and solutions than any of the jannies and mods. Your autism weaponized would do wonders to instill order. Thanks. >I am not the admin, and I have neither the power or the perms to make drastic site-wide decisions and changes. So it may be fruitless to propose any changes to me as my only real power is deciding what the jannies do or don't do (and ensuring they follow suit). Alright, I understand. I thought you'd be able to do something since you're almost an admin? I think? Is there anyone else above you besides Froot? Well anyway I was told by Gapeson that Froot can read PMs. Hopefully he'll soon see how right I am, heh. Or that Doll will be more pliant and listen to me once he's made the main admin again. I hope that will be the case.
1219	2023-11-26 13:57:24	Samuel	froot	Can I reveal that I'm a janny on /q/ or whatever?
1220	2023-11-28 03:57:07	froot	Samuel	>>>Funny how publicly banning me for "derailing" led to neutralniggers to flood the designated fnacoal thread ironically derailing it more so I just memoryholed that post >>marge idk what ur yapping on about. >Then it must've been someone else who did it, nevermind, also if you could reply to my other PM that'd be nice. take ur meds what pm
1222	2023-11-28 03:57:29	froot	Samuel	>Can I reveal that I'm a janny on /q/ or whatever? i mean sure idc ask root
1223	2023-11-28 13:31:27	Samuel	root	Can I reveal that I'm a janny on /q/ or whatever? Froot says he doesn't give a fuck and that I should ask you instead. https://files.catbox.moe/tghcb5.png
1224	2023-11-28 13:55:23	root	Samuel	>Can I reveal that I'm a janny on /q/ or whatever? Froot says he doesn't give a fuck and that I should ask you instead. >https://files.catbox.moe/tghcb5.png Is this a one-off thing or will you be repeatedly turning up in /q/ threads as a janny? FDL started doing it until I shut them down because they were answering from a place that was not the site authority. Also it can never be revealed for obvious reasons that your tripfag identity is also an active janitor.
1225	2023-11-28 15:45:03	Samuel	root	>Is this a one-off thing or will you be repeatedly turning up in /q/ threads as a janny? FDL started doing it until I shut them down because they were answering from a place that was not the site authority. Also it can never be revealed for obvious reasons that your tripfag identity is also an active janitor. I wasn't actually planning to, you know, just that it crossed my mind after participating in the newest thread from someone who claims to be a former 4chan janitor. But yes, I wouldn't do it too much. I would probably do it only when arguing against your rulings or something. Might get more people to agree with me. Aw, I was SO looking forward to attentionwhoring a little with my tripcode when I'm promoted to a moderator (which I'm confident is a WHEN, not an IF). But that's fine.
1226	2023-11-28 16:07:55	root	Samuel	It's best that only admin staff and long time mods reply in /q/. As for you being a moderator, you would have to get a grasp for flexible and nuanced moderation, which in the past you've criticized/characterized as being "inconsistent". There is a spectrum to offenses and threads, with some deserving to stay up or not be moved while others would be; is not black and white. I guess you could make it black and white, but that leads to robotic moderation and an unfun Party.
1227	2023-11-28 16:14:01	Samuel	doll	Dear nigger lover, Allow me to bombard you with questions since I think this is the first time I've spoken to you directly besides our brief interactions on Telegram (A hellish platform I want to never use again.) -What do you think of my Surviving the /qa/ Coaltalogue blogposts? -What do you think of making /qa/ the main board and locking /soy/ for a week so that users actually start using boards besides /soy/? Most of them would migrate to /qa/, thus diluting its current shit stain of a "culture" with real 'jakkers, and also paving the way to enforcing NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/ more effectively. -What do you think of banning selfinserting and blogposting on /soy/? (Even if you don't want it to be locked for a week.) -What do you think of instructing janitors to move NAS threads away from /soy/ rather than outright deleting them? -What do you think of my 9 boards plan and the post I made on Kiwifarms defending it? [/q/ /qa/ /soy/ /raid/ /r/] [/x/ /mtv/ /bant/ /sci/] -What do you think of adding poster IDs to /q/ and /pol/-slash-/bant/ (which would be the only board with flags under my plan)? -If you disagree with the 9 boards plan, what do you think of merging /incel/ with /q/? As was the intention of the 5 boards plan when merging /suggest/ and /incel/ into /q/. -What do you think of freely allowing catty wiping /qa/ and repealing this ruling? [/qa/thread/193956.html#207022 >>>/qa/207022] (As I say, 4cuck's /qa/ had none of this bullshit and would freely allow it.) -What do you think of emulating the constaints of 4chan on some boards? Such as the page count, bump and image limit, etc. but more importantly a bigger cooldown between posts and an even bigger cooldown between threads? (This would make cattywiping /qa/ more difficult and actually require cooperating with several users.) -What do you think of of banning ban evaders who post complaining about their ban on /q/ instead of engaging with them? -How do you feel about the Party's current boards in general, and my plan for them specifically? Do you have any plans for them yourself? These questions are mainly ones about what you think of my proposals and the future of our boards. I like you as an individual, I would like to get along. But I also have very strong and specific opinions and I would like to understand where you are coming from. We can agree to disagree on certain things (Not that many since I'm sure we have a lot of common ground). But I do think I need to make you aware of these things since you are very much a part of this whole process. Thank you for being a much more reasonable admin than those faggots and for actually trying to improve the site. I'm sure there are a few other questions but these are the major ones. I look forward to your reply. God bless you.
1228	2023-11-28 16:54:58	Samuel	froot	>take ur meds what pm Fuck, I'm sure I had sent it. I forgot all about it, but then I decided to you ask for feedback on my coaltalogue blog because I'm starved for attention or whatever. I even shortened it for you with the help of our AI friends: Day 1: Questions seemed absurd, ventured into the mine hoping for gems, not fights. /qa/ misunderstands complex topics, yet it's a dead board, questioning its demise. Day 2: A variety of discussions—tranime, user disputes—showed /qa/'s diverse nature. Despite differing content, even disliked topics sparked lively debates. Day 4: Reflecting humorously on 4 days; noticed extreme reactions due to few active users. Seven resilient individuals remain, reminiscent of a public toilet site. Day 5: Unexpected data wipe, but /qa/ bounced back with threads. An attention-seeking poster stirred controversy, making /qa/ feel like a game—collecting and improving posts like Monopoly properties. Day 6: Panic over coaltalogue problems; day spent scrolling through boring threads, gaining minimal insights. Day 7: Frustrated by /qa/'s reception, felt targeted and trolled, considering drastic actions. Struggled to find a place despite attempts to engage. Day 8: Routine gemming efforts hindered by process issues, missing trolling gemmers. /qa/ felt repetitive, lacking humorous topics compared to /soy/. Day 9: Disappointment with lackluster activity, disliking the board's state. Awaited gems but found little to enjoy. Day 10: Disheartened by /qa/, saw potential but felt it lacked substance. Described the board's potential for improvement. Day 11: Reflecting on the oddity of /qa/, its focus on coal. Contemplated how to manage coal levels, prevent its dominance on boards. Day 12: Explored /qa/'s intended function, proposing focused moderation. Found /qa/ lacked coherence, feeling like a wasteland. Day 13: Noted the board's quietness, attempted engagement met with misunderstandings. Tried encouraging image posts but faced unexpected responses. Day 14: Many disliked /qa/, fearing its future neglect. Expressed concerns about the board's state and potential lack of care. Day 15: Day ended peacefully, nothing major occurred. Day 16: Admitted uncertainty in posts, discussed conformity and the need for authentic engagement on /qa/. Day 17: Explored conflicts and struggles within /qa/, reflecting on the board's state. Day 18: Acknowledged /qa/'s reputation for blunt feedback, emphasizing the need for discernment in responses. Day 19: Explored the changes in /qa/'s dynamics over time, expressed love for the community, and reflected on adapting to new environments. Day 20: Appreciated in-depth meta discussions, recognized the complexity of proposed solutions, and sought focused discussions on key issues. Day 20: Blogger seeks feedback, mainly received negative responses, hoping to avoid abandonment. Day 22: Reflects on the evolution of /qa/ but notes decreased activity, questions why. Day 23: Discusses a thread disruption involving inappropriate content, trying to steer the conversation back. Day 24: Observes /qa/'s liveliness, expresses concern over moderation speed and community alignment. Day 25: Prepares for the blog anniversary, discusses the broader /qa/ community experience. Day 26: Offers survival guide for engaging on /qa/, advising mental resilience against trolls. Day 27: Contemplates the future of /qa/, emphasizing the need for direction and unity. Day 28: Describes /qa/ as a challenging place, notes a dominant perspective that affects the board. Day 29: Reflects on personal memories related to /qa/, expresses disappointment in its current state. Day 30: Encourages discussions about /qa/'s situation and history, feeling fatigued by the topic. Day 31: Addresses a recent wipe, defending multiple threads' legitimacy, urges trust in moderators. Day 32: Notes increased forum activity, categorizes posters into different groups with varying perspectives. Day 33: Reflects on the lack of meta discussions on /qa/, suggests merging /q/ and /qa/. Day 34: States that nothing noteworthy occurred on this day. Day 35: Hoped for changes in /qa/ didn't happen. The Great NAS war continues. Old habits persist, making the board unstable. Uphill battle against strong forces. Still hopeful for /qa/'s restoration. Day 36: Trannies on /qa/ compared to masturbation – unfulfilling. Feels demoralized, admitting failure. Day 37: New users misunderstand mods' roles. Believes site redesign unnecessary. Encourages banter with "tranny jannies." Day 38: Reflects on the elusive nature of reality. Proposes colonizing /i/ to influence 4chan's culture toward soyjaks and normalize /qa/. Day 40: Reports on gem raids in various threads. Gaining perspective on /qa/ community and its quirks. Day 41: Acknowledges sharty happenings, minor pedophile furtroon raid. Reflects on making /qa/ more interesting without constant drama. Day 42: Writes about the process of learning on /qa/. Expresses frustration with lack of scientific approach and monotony. Day 43: Discusses stagnation on /qa/, urges continuous improvement. Mentions recent natural posts and soyjak content. Day 45: Addresses catterino wipes, emphasizes the need for trust between users and mods on /qa/. Day 46: Mentions a catty wipe, expresses concern over mod actions on /qa/. Day 46: Describes troonori raid on another board. Expresses pride in participation, acknowledges challenges. Day 48: Cancels blog due to challenges. Day 52: Skips writing due to a busy life. Expresses dissatisfaction with certain boards, suggests deletions. Day 53: Reflects on the collapse of the 5 boards plan, shares thoughts on board deletions. Day 54: Comments on /qa/ variety, critiques board design. Urges closer resemblance to /qa/ and dissatisfaction with slow changes. Day 55: Addresses furtroon menace, calls for moderation against disruptive trends. Expresses confusion over calls for the old school of /qa/ to die. Day 56: Two threads grabbed attention. One was a classic bump request for attention, while the other attempted a subtle subversive move, sparking a soap opera-like thread progression. Day 57: Unremarkable day. Day 58: A grim start with spam issues, including scat spammers and site downtime. A new kind of subversive raid was considered, sparking interest. Day 59: Contemplating raiding approaches, emphasizing team coordination and learning through practice. Day 60: Reflecting on significant happenings, discussing the legacy and impact of certain users' actions on the community. Day 62: Early trouble with undesirable posts. A call for posting gems to counter unwelcome threads, planning to elevate content quality. Day 64: Reflecting on the impact of a "no-NAS" weekend on board dynamics, expressing preference for a permanent rule despite workaround attempts. Day 67: Sharing insights on the dynamics of forum interactions and the sense of hierarchy, acknowledging the influence of certain users. Day 68: Contemplating the influx of new users and potential sources, discussing changes in board culture and personal observations. Day 72: Growing fatigue and cynicism toward /qa/'s content, seeking the humorous side amidst frustrating threads. Day 75: Reflecting on personal growth in understanding board dynamics and evolving perspectives on posting habits. Day 76: Noting the recent chaos and catty wipes, finding humor in the turbulent state of the forum. Day 82: Discussing desires to maintain /qa/ despite its flaws, reflecting on proposals to expand or shut down the board.
1231	2023-11-29 05:58:26	root	Samuel	You are the only tripfag on the site staff and you're invested in the site /q/uality, so I will ask for your take on my pending decision to re-enforce rule 7 sitewide. I imagine the only boards exempt would be /incel/ and /raid/. If I had to lead by example, I'd gladly become Chud ## Manager and only make appearances when necessary.
1233	2023-11-29 13:27:50	Samuel	root	>You are the only tripfag on the site staff and you're invested in the site /q/uality, so I will ask for your take on my pending decision to re-enforce rule 7 sitewide. I imagine the only boards exempt would be /incel/ and /raid/. >If I had to lead by example, I'd gladly become Chud ## Manager and only make appearances when necessary. Kind of going on a tangent here, but first off I'd like to criticize Froot and you for engaging with avatarfags and ban evaders complaining about their bans or whatever on /q/. See: [/q/thread/140476.html#140483 >>>/q/140483] [/q/thread/140476.html#140488 >>>/q/140488] [/q/thread/141795.html#141795 >>>/q/141795] That's setting a bad precedent. As for the ban evaders, instead of replying, ban them again and instruct them how to fill the ban appeal box (standard procedure). Or something. Now, I appreciate your willingness to take a proactive stance on rule enforcement. Honestly though? I propose reforming rule 7: >Avatarfagging or posting in an identifiable manner (such as using signatures) is not permitted. There's a big difference between that and namefagging. I'd go as far as to say /q/ and /soy/ (and whatever other boards that currently don't allow namefagging) should permit namefagging as well, though I don't know much about Remilia and Soot's decision to disable namefagging on /soy/ and the subsequent admins' decision to never reenable it afterwards. Avatarfagging, using signatures and posting in an identifiable manner (though loosely defined) are more visually distracting and annoying than namefagging, as images are more noticeable and repetitive than text. Also, I find that avatarfagging is more likely to derail threads and cause flame wars than namefagging, as images are more provocative and controversial than text. Furthermore, avatarfagging is more associated with trolling and spamming than namefagging, as images are easier to manipulate and abuse than text. People can also filter namefags they don't like, no? Namefagging can be a good thing, however. People who are new to the boards can follow namefags to threads they contribute to and learn from them. And people who have a history on the board and are well liked can lead productive discussions. So unless they cause a disruption or some abuse, I'd leave them be. As for the boards that should be exempt from the new rule 7 (that allows namefagging), I strongly suggest adding /qa/ to your list. I've said this before, but we should strive to be as similar to 4chan's /qa/ as possible, because /qa/ can be as good as /qa/. I'm not sure how 4cuck jannies enforced the anti-avatar rule there, but I think it's safe to say they didn't enforce it at all. I'm not saying this because I'm an attentionwhore who's desperate for attention though, obviously. I probably wouldn't use my trip on /soy/, but I would on /q/. It's also worth noting that I think most people on the site don't mind namefags at all. Though that might change if it were allowed on /soy/ (the board with >85% of this site's posts.) I want to discuss this further, please respond.
1235	2023-11-29 14:12:58	root	Samuel	/soy/ will stay anonymous and never get an editable name field. Between marioman, shadowmario, and kleki, I have gotten way too many complaints and we even had to permaban one for streaming for afterparty. People tolerate namefags on /qa/ and do not enjoy them. That said, I believe I will hold off on my decision, because DOLL returns as admin in a month. I will let him deal with these kind of admin decisions and stick to managing the janitorial team. This also goes back to your first point. Any complaints youd have for froot and me will then be directed toward froot and doll. I simply don't have the bandwidth to deal with this. You may not even see my capcode appear publicly again after he comes back.
1236	2023-11-29 14:37:09	Samuel	root	>/soy/ will stay anonymous and never get an editable name field. Between marioman, shadowmario, and kleki, I have gotten way too many complaints and we even had to permaban one for streaming for afterparty. People tolerate namefags on /qa/ and do not enjoy them. >That said, I believe I will hold off on my decision, because DOLL returns as admin in a month. I will let him deal with these kind of admin decisions and stick to managing the janitorial team. This also goes back to your first point. Any complaints youd have for froot and me will then be directed toward froot and doll. I simply don't have the bandwidth to deal with this. You may not even see my capcode appear publicly again after he comes back. I completely understand the stance on keeping /soy/ anonymous. I don't have the same perspective as you do, since the complaints about namefags aren't mine to deal with. I know you have a lot of work to do as a manager, and you have to deal with many complaints and challenges. I agree that it’s better to wait for Doll to come back before making any changes. But in the meantime, how will rule 7 be enforced on /qa/? I understand that you want to direct any future concerns or complaints to Froot and Doll, since you are busy with the janitorial team. You have to prioritize your tasks and use your time wisely. I respect your role and your efficiency. I think it’s a smart decision to step back from public appearances after Doll returns. This will help the transition and the communication with the users. You are very thoughtful and committed to your work. Thank you for keeping me informed, and I hope that Doll’s return will resolve these issues.
1237	2023-11-29 15:03:53	root	Samuel	>I completely understand the stance on keeping /soy/ anonymous. I don't have the same perspective as you do, since the complaints about namefags aren't mine to deal with. > >I know you have a lot of work to do as a manager, and you have to deal with many complaints and challenges. I agree that it’s better to wait for Doll to come back before making any changes. But in the meantime, how will rule 7 be enforced on /qa/? > >I understand that you want to direct any future concerns or complaints to Froot and Doll, since you are busy with the janitorial team. You have to prioritize your tasks and use your time wisely. I respect your role and your efficiency. > >I think it’s a smart decision to step back from public appearances after Doll returns. This will help the transition and the communication with the users. You are very thoughtful and committed to your work. Thank you for keeping me informed, and I hope that Doll’s return will resolve these issues. I appreciate the kind words. I believe that all your questions and concerns about whether ban evasion is "allowed" or not will all be answered come the return of the Admin–one of them will make the end-all final call (likely Doll who'll say ban evasion won't be tolerated or replied to). I have been operating in a pseudo-admin capacity simply because Froot isn't really around much and has directed many calls and decisions about rules to me. 'teens think Manager has the ability to change boards, pages, and user roles, when in reality it's just the Mod role who can see the mod log and see IPs. It's been a learning and growing process for all of us since the site came back, which I thought may have been gone for good. As for /qa/, nothing changes: global rule 7 will not apply. People, as they can now, will be able to put anything in the name field and make posts and replies without risk of being banned. For now, threads created with the topic of a certain namefag or tripfag will be moved to /incel/ which is how it went during the Doll era–Kleki threads on /soy/ were either deleted or moved to /incel/ (as opposed to /qa/). Your coaltalogue threads are fine because the topic is /qa/ and its contents and the community, not yourself or another individual. I thought about telling Doll that I'd step down to normal Mod once he returns, but since I won't need to be making many appearances or high level decisions anymore, being the Manager as how it was intended should be just enough work for me: Doll handles the rules and PR, I handle communicating with the janny team. I have high hopes for the next year for the Party.
1238	2023-11-29 16:51:39	Samuel	root	>I appreciate the kind words. I believe that all your questions and concerns about whether ban evasion is "allowed" or not will all be answered come the return of the Admin–one of them will make the end-all final call (likely Doll who'll say ban evasion won't be tolerated or replied to). Ban evasion is a serious offense that undermines the authority and credibility of the mods and admins, and that disrupts the order and harmony of the boards. Ban evasion is also a sign of disrespect and defiance towards the rules and the community, and that encourages more rule-breaking and trolling. Therefore, ban evasion should not be tolerated or replied to, but rather detected and punished as soon as possible, regardless of who is in charge. >I have been operating in a pseudo-admin capacity simply because Froot isn't really around much and has directed many calls and decisions about rules to me. 'teens think Manager has the ability to change boards, pages, and user roles, when in reality it's just the Mod role who can see the mod log and see IPs. It's been a learning and growing process for all of us since the site came back, which I thought may have been gone for good. It's understandable that you've taken on this role due to Froot's limited availability and the delegation of calls and rule-related decisions. The transitional phase since the site's return seems to have been demanding adjustments. I have been adapting by learning to put up with things I can't stand in order to reinforce my love for the site. The uncertainty around the site's return must have made the entire process even more challenging. How have you been finding this experience? I am deeply unsatisfied by Froot's adminship but I'm not gonna elaborate unless asked to. >Doll handles the rules and PR, I handle communicating with the janny team. I have high hopes for the next year for the Party. It's great to see a structured approach to responsibilities. Sadly though I will have to be less active next year. I hope Doll will be more easily swayed by my weak arguments about altering the board structure and hiding sage and all that stuff. I repeat myself too much, don't I? Which sadly doesn't add much to my arguments. But I'm confident he will be convinced. I've already sent him a PM but he hasn't replied yet. By the way, what do you think of adding the janitor board /j/? I believe we need that.
1307	2023-12-14 00:38:45	Samuel	froot	Dear nigger lover, Please reenable the name field on /qa/ because 4cvck's /qa/ allowed it. That's my only argument.
1318	2023-12-25 18:52:03	root	Samuel	Doll has officially returned as Admin as per his long /q/ sticky. In regards to suggestions on rules changes and topics such as evasion (I've come to agree with you; addressing teens who ban evade to post on /q/ shouldnt be encouraged) you should go to him. He has resumed the name "doll" on PMs. For inquiries on enforcing the current rules, you should continue to report to me. Merry Soymas
1326	2023-12-28 15:46:55	Samuel	root	>As for you being a moderator, you would have to get a grasp for flexible and nuanced moderation, which in the past you've criticized/characterized as being "inconsistent". There is a spectrum to offenses and threads, with some deserving to stay up or not be moved while others would be; is not black and white. I guess you could make it black and white, but that leads to robotic moderation and an unfun Party. It's not that I want to be promoted to moderator anytime soon (I only want the ability to moove threds), but that's bullshit. Just because you feel some post doesn't deserve a 'nishment, that doesn't mean it's not a 'nishable offense, you can't just decide if something is 'nishable or not based on what you "feel" should be 'nished or not, that's not how moderation works, if something's 'nishable, it should be 'nished. Just like the police, you can't decide if someone gets a ticket for speeding or not based on whether you want him to or not, if the cop sees him speeding, he has to get a ticket. The best example of this is the NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/ rule. Froot has said on numerous occasions that /soy/ is meant to be 100% IAS (with the exception of 'cado because Froot's brain is on a strict diet of raw dog turds), but this rule is not enforced, despite my efforts to consistently report every single NAS post. And consider that I have the option to delete them (with cause), but I don't do so. The end result is that despite being a clear, unambiguous rule (no NAS on /soy/), that rule is essentially non-existent because it's not enforced. The same thing goes for many other 'nishable offenses. That kind of "nuanced" moderation is garbage. Nuanced is a fancy word for "lacking in standards". I believe I'm one of the more conservative/reactionary members of the mod team. I try to follow the rules strictly and uphold standards. It's my opinion that there is a strong correlation between a lax approach to enforcement and lower Party quality (except for /qa/, THAT should be the virtually unmoderated board.) I think the rule changes and other measures taken recently are attempts to combat this. I am on board with this. It makes sense to try and combat the general decline in Party quality and culture. I would like to take part in this process of reformation. As proactively as I can. I like to think I am a fairly competent user, so I have a sense of how to operate the boards (though this has been made difficult with Froot's addition of so many coalboards) well and can carry out my tasks with a certain level of efficiency.
1327	2023-12-28 16:19:29	root	Samuel	Cops do often let people off with a warning for speeding or a parking infringement. Some officers may see the human side of a problem and approach understanding the situation. Repeat offenders are punished more severely by the law. This is how I manage the site; I have no desire or motivation to enact zero-tolerance moderation. I respect your disagreement with my approach. Big-picture changes like what youd propose (no nas on soy no matter what) is a Doll decision now, he is active again as "doll" on sharty PMs. He recently made updates to the rules page, and this is a proposition you could take up with him. I believe moderation with nuance/levels of severity is what makes sharty more appealing than other sites of similar content. Doll'a creation of /jak/ instead of strictly moderating /soy/ is a decision in its own; I won't be contesting it. I'm back to managing the janitorial staff, not working as a admin stand-in who decides rules.
1328	2023-12-28 16:35:42	115	Samuel	are you a slut for roots bibisee? https://a.cockfile.com/EWPBqv.png https://a.cockfile.com/RgMZbC.png
1331	2023-12-28 18:15:09	Samuel	115	>are you a slut for roots bibisee? >https://a.cockfile.com/EWPBqv.png >https://a.cockfile.com/RgMZbC.png Not clicking your datamining links
1332	2023-12-28 18:31:25	115	Samuel	>>are you a slut for roots bibisee? >>https://a.cockfile.com/EWPBqv.png >>https://a.cockfile.com/RgMZbC.png >Not clicking your datamining links root should demote your obsessed ass nigger
1333	2023-12-28 22:26:28	Samuel	115	>>>are you a slut for roots bibisee? >>>https://a.cockfile.com/EWPBqv.png >>>https://a.cockfile.com/RgMZbC.png >>Not clicking your datamining links >root should demote your obsessed ass nigger Take your meds schizo or whatever or something though
1370	2024-01-03 19:35:26	Samuel	54	Dear nigger lover, I sent you a PM a while ago but you never responded. But anyway, I wanted to message you about the boards and the policy of NO-NAS-ON-/SOY/. Froot has stated several times that /soy/ is already meant to be 100% IAS, but this is not being enforced properly. I believe that deleting /pol/ and /int/ and creating /bant/ instead would be a good idea. I'd also like to see the deletions of the many hidden boards, including /caca/. Babyjaks have run their course, haven't they? I'd also like to see hidden sage, 10 min cooldown between threads and the locking of /soy/ for a week. I've been very vocal about all this for a good while now, but I'd like to see your thoughts. I'll explain why I believe these to be good ideas in another message. Can we put this on the agenda for today?
1371	2024-01-03 20:58:01	root	Samuel	Stop reporting the poog thread. Light "sharty culture" NAS is allowed on /soy/ and if you continue being maliciously compliant with over-reporting NAS then we're gonna have to do something about it.
1372	2024-01-03 21:02:47	Samuel	root	>maliciously compliant Ö
1407	2024-01-18 20:30:31	90	Samuel	i'm not hotpockets albeit