Talk:Gay people (supporter perspective)
what?
[edit source]Isn't the Sharty against ts? Cuh I'on curr if few Sharty users were exposed as troons/fags, this page should be nuked to antimatter o algo. This has a potential of killing coal because of nuswa approaching Sharty culture via this very 'ki doe. This article is best known for deserving deletion ASAP!!!
talk
[edit source]this page sucks for other reasons but what is that deletion reason lmao Rolling Sky 03:58, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- gimmick spam le bad and also the trend of people creating "supporter perspectives" for stuff the soysphere dislikes will inevitably attract genuine supporters of said stuff
yes delete DQNALD K TRVMP (talk) 07:09, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- If it keeps on going we'll eventually have Foodists (supporter perspective) so you might as well delete it. In fact, homofascists make fascism and nazism look bad.
delete this page
[edit source]Do it it sucks Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 08:08, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- Turn this page into a cheap copy of Edramatica's offended. No one seriously cares about this one.
Delete it
[edit source]- Contributes almost nothing, the only thing it attracts is self-hating closeted homo newfags, and it's extremely ESL
Why this page is unnecessary
[edit source]1) It's overwhelmingly unpopular among 'teens, who find themselves against globohomo shit (maybe only in the 'ru and the shroom you find these faggots, and even still, their presence is purely spam as if they posted like others they would be underrepresented) 2) We have too many supporter perspectives on things that back in the day we would have doxxed faggots for, at this point we are gonna get supporter perspective of DNB or worse shit 3) yes I know you are gonna HTSMQuote me faggot I know you are reading this TheCatalan1977 (talk) 12:45, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
- 1, 2, and 3 are not reasons to delete the page. I've moved it to SNCA for the time being due to it being low quality, once its improved it can be moved back to main later. Rickert (talk) 12:59, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
OHNONONONONO
[edit source]WIKIFLAMBOYANTS WHAT IS THIS? GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEG
qeeeeeeeeq keep this
this page sucks
[edit source]I edited it to be more passive aggresive against homos but it's still useless dust, maybe if others made it more anti-faggot it could stick around. Also change the article name to "Faggots (supporter_perspective)" Because there is no "Gay people" article in the first place. The nigga who made this article doesn't even understand how alternate perspective pages work, let alone the English language Pineapple Punch (talk) 19:18, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
why bother re-wiring, this should be deleted NAOW DQNALD K TRVMP (talk) 20:11, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
Most unfathomable wikipill
[edit source]Bro… Synonymous (talk) 20:09, 17 September 2026 (UTC)
Geg
[edit source]Imagine an article so bad that not even some editor making it ironic or passive aggressive can save it. Most of the points against the fag "gays vs trannies" war were already made in the original article, it's safe to say both will die of AIDs or Acking TheCatalan1977 (talk) 06:55, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Suggestion
[edit source]Let's make this a redirect to kys obsessed faggot and link it on the Faggots page Martincho (talk) 14:06, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
- That is not what a perspective article is for and there is no reason to omit its content. Rickert (talk) 14:17, 18 September 2026 (UTC)
Do we actually need this shit?
[edit source]Be honest, what does this bring to the wiki, and who actually is reading this? Soyoyuki (talk) 16:55, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
- does not meet deletion criteria, and stealthily trying to delete it by turning it into a useless redirect might as well be vandalism Rickert (talk) 16:56, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
- ♃Stratosphere♃ (talk) 18:34, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
- rickert needs validation, otherwise it would have been deleted like a week ago DQNALD K TRVMP (talk) 17:16, 22 September 2026 (UTC)
— Swail, 17:24, 22 September 2026 (UTC)- Nominating gimmick trash articles for deletion is giga behavior doebeit
- Nominating gimmick trash articles for deletion is giga behavior doebeit
I fear this will result in irony poisoning
[edit source]Why tf is this page here?--Carbon (talk) 15:00, 16 October 2026 (UTC)
