Talk:Warrior-Z

Hold on Warrior-Z Do you actually use 'cord?

https://www.reddit.com/r/PowerScaling/comments/1f6lwsm/who_the_hell_is_warriorz/

Found this on reddit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobbyfisheye (talk • contribs)

OH NO NO NO 1984Jak (talk) 08:23, 5 May 2025 (EST)

>hola mi name is warrior 'p I love gooning to hentai and as a fat sandnigger myself i love brapping the ru

>portraying warrior-'p as white in the big 2025

Literally nobody potrays warrior p as a white ninja chudjak

The mexiaryan slopjak is used by everyone (97%) and sometimes white aryan mexiaryan soyjak

Trvthnvke above me but also two foodist.

can someone do this

so about the trevor copypasta, i uploaded the images he used in the copypasta but it's hard to put images in tables so can someone else place the images in it Thougher, Talk page, Contributions 02:23, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Unmerge detractor perspective

Literally no reason to merge the two articles. HewlettBraptard (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

@HewlettBraptard No. The detractor perspective was only there because he asked his discordspergs to edit war here (with support from wiki jannies) to draw him in a positive light. He doesn't run this place anymore so anybody can smear him now. –Gem 💎 (talk) 23:00, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

I do agree that it needs a rewrite though. –Gem 💎 (talk) 23:00, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

holy kek

imagine sperging out this hard over a janny purge, no wonder boorucucks are hated on every other site GapeNewell (talk) 23:02, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

keep the shaketext image header

its aryan
we don't need to >UHHHHHHHHHH IT NEEDS TO ABIDE BY TEMPLATE QUESTION 1, 2, 3, 3.141293912030123 AND ALSO THE CIRCUMFERENCE OF FEMQUOTE'S ASSHOLE every single page Soyoyuki (talk) 23:03, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

heavily disagree, its shit and annoying, and this whole page needs immediate rework Rickert (talk) 23:04, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

agree with Rickert. –Gem 💎 (talk) 23:05, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Brave trans women above me ^^ Soyjaks (talk) 23:12, 21 August 2026 (UTC)

Merging this with the detractor perspective raped the page.

It's now an cluttered mess.

Return the supporter and detractor perspectives

This page is a mess, it's horribly merged, and regarding a controversial figure, which means there are going to be defenders and detractors, so having just the detractor perspective with a merge attempt is not gonna work. TheCatalan1977 (talk) 14:08, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

Fix the page then. It's already been decided that having gorillion perspective pages was a failed approach, and should only be done in case of extremely controversial topics. –Gem 💎 (talk) 19:10, 3 September 2026 (UTC)

I'll do it Rickert (talk) 01:20, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

@TheCatalan1977 @Gem resolved Rickert (talk) 11:08, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

though I should clarify that I resolved the page's quality, and trimmed some of the snca detractor stuff. It still contains most of the detractor content. In my opinion, it doesn't need to be split to a detractor perspective again and is fine as is, since most of the detractor content documents things about him. Rickert (talk) 11:18, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Good job, you really gemmified it G-Man (talk) 12:42, 4 September 2026 (UTC)