CURRENT MISSION: Conclude the 2026 soyjak.party hack page, aswell as any pages relating to it, such as the Summer 2026 Crisis page.
Update Quotecord with any relevant info. See the blackboard for more info.

Talk:Salt (detractor perspective): Difference between revisions

From Soyjak Wiki, the free ensoyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Created page with ">Something went wrong, please try again later. ~Chud11002 (talk) 12:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)"
 
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
>Something went wrong, please try again later. [[Special:Contributions/~Chud11002|~Chud11002]] ([[User talk:~Chud11002|talk]]) 12:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
>Something went wrong, please try again later. [[Special:Contributions/~Chud11002|~Chud11002]] ([[User talk:~Chud11002|talk]]) 12:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
== Marge ==
How can there be a detractor page for a guy who hasn't been admin for more than a day? [[User:Rickert|Rickert]] ([[User talk:Rickert|talk]]) 14:52, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
== hating admins is sharty culture ==
the same was done when fenriris became admin so i say we keep it --[[User:Statis|Statis]] ([[User talk:Statis|talk]]) 16:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
:with how it is now, its actually quite good. [[User:Rickert|Rickert]] ([[User talk:Rickert|talk]]) 17:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
== somewhat aids but i say keep it ==
the writing style is autistic and the page sucks, but there's no reason to remove it geg. i think it's quite nice
--[[User:RapeDenDweller1488|RapeDenDweller1488]] ([[User talk:RapeDenDweller1488|talk]]) 23:37, 12 August 2026 (UTC)
:i think the writing style is like that because its ai

Latest revision as of 15:45, 21 August 2026

>Something went wrong, please try again later. ~Chud11002 (talk) 12:45, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Marge[edit source]

How can there be a detractor page for a guy who hasn't been admin for more than a day? Rickert (talk) 14:52, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

hating admins is sharty culture[edit source]

the same was done when fenriris became admin so i say we keep it --Statis (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

with how it is now, its actually quite good. Rickert (talk) 17:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)


somewhat aids but i say keep it[edit source]

the writing style is autistic and the page sucks, but there's no reason to remove it geg. i think it's quite nice

--RapeDenDweller1488 (talk) 23:37, 12 August 2026 (UTC)

i think the writing style is like that because its ai