Soyjak Wiki talk:Template/Quality headers

kek good riddance - Adolfrizzler (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

I don't see why we're getting rid of them honestly, sure they add little to the article and are commonly misused but I feel getting rid of them would make the 'ki more boring overall. 〜 ✨ MarketPliers ✨ ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა (leak here) 00:28, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

it's because 90% of them are redundant you fucking furfag tranny GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 05:26, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

leak moar 〜 ✨ MarketPliers ✨ ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა (leak here) 09:04, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

>i'm gonna ask a dumb question and then lash out when given an appropriate answer

nigger behavior GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 09:20, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

>>i'm gonna ask a dumb question and then lash out when given an appropriate answer
>nigger behavior 〜 ✨ MarketPliers ✨ ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა (leak here) 10:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

inconsistent amount of arrows therefore you look like that and say one of those

anyways regarding page quality templates

I think that while we go through the process of trimming templates in general we keep page quality headers to just what's necessary

>Gem for good articles that follow the manual of style, go sufficiently in depth on their subject for people to understand them without veering into SNCA territory or becoming walls of text, and look nice
>Coal for articles that need improvement to meet standards, or are stubs that don't adequately explain the topic in question
>Gemerald for articles that got featured

That's basically all we need. Though we could trim things a bit further and just have the gem/coal templates for featured/low quality articles, respectively, but that does leave out a step inbetween good articles to treat as examples of what to do and articles that were good enough to be featured. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 04:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

new layout

I want to hear your thoughts on the new template list I'm experimenting with, I've noticed that it's quite confusing to edit whilst using the Visual Editor so I will probably revert these changes at some point to fix these issues, but they can stay for the meantime since we're not getting any new rating any time soon. Thoughts? 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 23:32, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Should i import {{Coal}} from SECApedia?

It was used as a template for "almost suffice" pages. Soyoyuki (talk) 23:54, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

G-Man likes this.

Sure, doe the same template was deleted before I believe. Rickert (talk) 23:56, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Since you are a mod, you should be able to undelete it, no? Rickert (talk) 23:57, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, mods can undelete pages. Undeleted it G-Man (talk) 23:59, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

I disagree, pages that almost suffice should have no template. we don't want template spam here. –Gem 💎 (talk) 00:10, 14 August 2026 (UTC) 00:10, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Distinguish Ruby and Rust

@Soyoyuki title, the two templates are somewhat similar, so how do you plan to better distinguish them? Rickert (talk) 00:09, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Marge? They mean completely different things. Soyoyuki (talk) 00:15, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Mainly was talking about Ruby's vague description in comparison to Rust. I changed it a bit so you'll see what I meant. I also toned Rust down to "limited quality" since that feels more appropriate for its spot. If you don't like it, feel free to revert Rickert (talk) 00:27, 14 August 2026 (UTC)