kek good riddance - Adolfrizzler (talk) 23:52, 12 January 2026 (UTC)
I don't see why we're getting rid of them honestly, sure they add little to the article and are commonly misused but I feel getting rid of them would make the 'ki more boring overall. 〜 ✨ MarketPliers ✨ ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა (leak here) 00:28, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
it's because 90% of them are redundant you fucking furfag tranny GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 05:26, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
>>i'm gonna ask a dumb question and then lash out when given an appropriate answer >nigger behavior 〜 ✨ MarketPliers ✨ ૮ ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶ ა (leak here) 10:24, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
inconsistent amount of arrows therefore you look like that and say one of those
I think that while we go through the process of trimming templates in general we keep page quality headers to just what's necessary
>Gem for good articles that follow the manual of style, go sufficiently in depth on their subject for people to understand them without veering into SNCA territory or becoming walls of text, and look nice
>Coal for articles that need improvement to meet standards, or are stubs that don't adequately explain the topic in question
>Gemerald for articles that got featured
That's basically all we need. Though we could trim things a bit further and just have the gem/coal templates for featured/low quality articles, respectively, but that does leave out a step inbetween good articles to treat as examples of what to do and articles that were good enough to be featured. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 04:25, 14 January 2026 (UTC)
