Talk:Amerimutt

Why do random IPs seem to be dead set on removing da plamber? --Tefal (talk) 01:44, 6 September 2023 (EST)

Tefal (talk Because theres a ongoing war between the sharty poles and "mapuche" the plamber is a /Pol/ brimstone that doesn't have any kind of soy elements in it therefore it should be considered a Nas unlike amerimutt that criticises the consumerism a staple in the original soyjak yet I don't like too many of mutt posts if comes to the plamber there's no soy elements at all >Cleaning toilets He's doing a Wagie job I guess >Niggers of Europe That was a statement from a Haitian prime minister >chekeen McDonald's is more popular here and there's barely any chicken related dishes here except rosuł and devolai we like pork more >Ugly face yea we get it, it's a Dres but these people died out in late 2000s and there's like no gang activities only drug smuggling >KURWWAAA Yea it's from that youtube movie a clip of satan saying that

STOP RUINING THE PAGE

This page was already perfect. Here are some things that MUST be reverted

• Amerimutt is NOT just subvariant:impish_mutt, amerimutt can be applied on many variants and still is, the subvariant should keep its own section.

• Muttspeak does not need an article either, removing the lingo section COMPLETELY BROKE the image formatting. The military 'pasta MUST have the military video beside it, and the muttenscharten incident 'pasta MUST have the EU flag sharting video beside it.

WORDSWORDSWORDS;DIDNTREAD Your edits actually ruined the page by fucking up the image formatting and unnecessarily moving the gemmy lingo section to a nowhere stub article, and incorrectly treating amerimutt as just the subvariant:impish_mutt variant. Revert it to my version Formerlychuckss (talk) 12:10, 18 February 2025 (EST)

i tried to talk to you in Talk:Muttspeak but i guess we can discuss this here instead:

1. it's true that mutt is a trend rather than a variant but when you say "amerimutt" absolutely no one is thinking of the "mutted" trend with pink lips. everyone is thinking of the swedejak.

2. the image formatting """breaking""" is not an issue. if the images are in the wrong place just move them. it's not rocket science.

3. the article as a whole is a giant amalgamation of like 3 different concepts. it cant decide whether it wants to be about the meme, the 'jak, the dueling/posting trend, and then had that long ass lingo section to boot. if you want, i can reinclude the muttspeak section but as an abridged version without the giant list and with a hatnote linking to the muttspeak page even though (it's already linked at the top of the article)

4. you are reverting without looking at the edits inbetween so you got rid of the featured gem footer.

5. The page "Muttspeak" was already an article but it was a redirect being linked to from the Dialects navbox that would just link you to this giant article. all i did was actually make it its own article and wrote a bit about it at the top. i also linked it from Portal:Soyspeak and it's linked in this main article so it will be read by anyone who knows how to click on blue text, contrary to your assertion. Cobblestone (talk) 12:20, 18 February 2025 (EST)

>no one is thinking of the "mutted" trend with pink lips. everyone is thinking of the swedejak.

This is irrelevant because the page is for learning about amerimutt as a whole, you're actually ADDING confusion by removing the distinction between the meme and the 'jak.

>the article as a whole is a giant amalgamation of like 3 different concepts.

This is nonsense, the page is just about Amerimutt, this includes the meme, the 'jak, the spam, the lingo, the hashban, the copypastas, etc. It includes everything relevant and related to amerimutt as a concept, very simple. Would you remove leebait from the lee goldson article? No, thats retarded.

>i can reinclude the muttspeak section but as an abridged version

The full section is funny as fuck, also its not THAT long, anybody can scroll through it all very easily. You could maybe do that with a hatnote so people are actually inclined to check it out but i still reccomend keeping it as it is.

>if the images are in the wrong place just move them

I TRIED. The issue is that they're crowded, you'll need to remove a few gems to do that.

>you are reverting without looking at the edits inbetween so you got rid of the featured gem footer

Not an issue, just add the minor edits back. Formerlychuckss (talk) 12:52, 18 February 2025 (EST)

hold on while while i edit. i think i can find a way to have a compromise. Cobblestone (talk) 12:54, 18 February 2025 (EST)

i included both the original mutt and the swede mutt in the upper summary section but i can split them again if you want. i also included muttspeak as a section while maintaining all of the imagery. is this good? Cobblestone (talk) 13:04, 18 February 2025 (EST)

This is good HOWEVER you should still split og mutt and swedemutt and give the variant its own section to avoid confusion + turtelli mutt was funny add him back (not like he clogged the page or anything) Formerlychuckss (talk) 13:06, 18 February 2025 (EST)

it's alright. i decided to just merge the articles. Cobblestone (talk) 13:08, 18 February 2025 (EST)

Yup its gemmy or however the whoppers are flipped Formerlychuckss (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2025 (EST)