TLDR: There's a script on archive.today to make your browser silently spam requests to a certain site, with the intention of using the combined traffic of all archive.today vistors to DDoS that site. Do not visit archive.today/archive.ph/archive.is/etc with javascript enabled. Rearchive all archive.ph links to megalodon.jp wherever you see them.
https://gyrovague.com/2026/02/01/archive-today-is-directing-a-ddos-attack-against-my-blog/
Talk:Hostility
No it wont, you don't need to add any more, if you don't like it you can remove them from the list Soytanator (talk) 23:01, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
Also the only ones here are the ones that have their own pages Soytanator (talk) 23:02, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Other people will add them over time and I don't want to have to babysit this page. Cobblestone (talk) 23:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Geg just lock the shit like SW5 Soytanator (talk) 23:04, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Also it's not a list, those are examples Soytanator (talk) 23:05, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- >Babysit because someone will add more. This is not any hard from like when someone adds a splinter link or vandalizes a page. If you think this is hard and takes time then IDK how dumb you are.
- The page is basically gonna be a list of hostile offsite communities. You didn't intend for it to be this way but the people who edit it will make it that way. Also the term "hostile" isn't in the rules anymore due to how vague it was, like people saying the Zarty/Sidty (dnb) is hostile. Cobblestone (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I put a warning on the page to not add anything. But you better think, is this ever gonna happen? Do not delete the page until anything similar happens Soytanator (talk) 23:12, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm probably gonna ack it. We don't need more pages revolving around dead 'cord boogeymen. Cobblestone (talk) 23:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- How about just remove the example section instead of the whole page, the first part of the page is actually useful Soytanator (talk) 23:19, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I'm probably gonna ack it. We don't need more pages revolving around dead 'cord boogeymen. Cobblestone (talk) 23:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I put a warning on the page to not add anything. But you better think, is this ever gonna happen? Do not delete the page until anything similar happens Soytanator (talk) 23:12, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- The page is basically gonna be a list of hostile offsite communities. You didn't intend for it to be this way but the people who edit it will make it that way. Also the term "hostile" isn't in the rules anymore due to how vague it was, like people saying the Zarty/Sidty (dnb) is hostile. Cobblestone (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
do we need another page talking about splinters[edit source]
do we really need this? Rabbit (talk) 23:15, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I felt the need to educate nusois on what is actually hostile and disruptive since some of them think you can't use anything but Sharty Soytanator (talk) 23:16, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- did you also feel the need to give more attention to these sites that rely on attention to actually survive Rabbit (talk) 23:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- Describing what is meant by the word "hostile" isn't giving attention to any splinters. North (talk) 07:32, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- I agree, if the problem was "advretising" (whatever that means, not like we are giving URLs or anything) with splinters we would've deleted the said splinter's main articles by extension anyway a long time ago. I think already known splinters like the shemmy and the jarty should be listed.DoctorCollins (talk) 08:10, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- Describing what is meant by the word "hostile" isn't giving attention to any splinters. North (talk) 07:32, 7 February 2026 (UTC)
- did you also feel the need to give more attention to these sites that rely on attention to actually survive Rabbit (talk) 23:24, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
