Talk:Islam (supporter perspective)

algx about the article

TL;DR

• Shias are innovators until Rafidhi (thinkers of some sahaba, may Allah be pleased with them all, as kafirs) and other Shia sects who would claim "prophethood" or "godness" of Ali (may Allah be pleased with him);
• Western Muslims are usually libtards and do major Shirk/Kufr, thus making them as non-Muslims (Zohran Mamdani, Hasan Piker, Ikhwanis, Bashar al-Assad),
• Most of "known" Sufis are kuffars/mushriks (Ibn Sina, Ibn Arabi, As-Suyuty, etc.),
• Osman "Khalifat" was pure brimstone almost full of shotapedocockroaches and polytheistic philosophic Sufis in gov. position.
• Ibn Taymiyah was not Sufi and is not extremist either, also Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhab is not an extremist and not a kafirs' plant,
• ISIS are extremists (Khawariji),
• Also do not glaze Najashi as "Christking" since he accepted Islam, but was somewhat afraid of own's people not accepting such interesting fact. But it is actual example of gemerald Christian because in Islam's perspective the best Judes and Christians are those who VVILL follow the Last Messenger of the God (peace upon him and blessings from Allah) since when their Scriptures were not corrupted, such Books had enough revelations to "know Muhammad (peace upon him and blessings from Allah) as their son (i. e. Arabic idioma for knowing better than anyone else)". So it is actually debated doe.
• Anal sex with woman is considered as "small sodomy", like it or not.
• Nothing more of disturbing was found yet.

R"N"CA

Shias

Shia are basically either making non-shirky/non-kufry innovations or they are basically kafirs for hating sahabas (may Allah be pleased with them all) and either claiming 'Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) as a prophet after Muhammad (peace upon him and blessings from Allah) or as God. Btw also being honest Shias' religion was actually constructed by a Jewish who was larping as a Muslim (i.e munafiq). Zohran Mamdani is a kafir btw though. Also Iranian gov. Shias are responsible for killing Palestinians and other Sunni Muslims as a cooperate with Israel. Such a dirty work!

Sufis

Sufi of nowadays are pure paganLARPs with their philosophy that sticks to Ancient Greek philosophy or to Hinduist'esque pantheism (saaar poop is also a god saaar). The earliest of earliest Sufis prolly can be called normal and not shirk-pilled. Ibn Arabi, Ibn Sina (evendoe he's a good Medical guy), As-Suyuty, etc. They now are Jahmis (kufr-pilled philosophers), not even Maturidi/Ash-ari (evendoe those two are bad enough) and tend to cooperate with kafir govs. to 'nish Sunni Muslims who know too much about local Sufis' polytheistic and apostasy things btw. Ibn Taymiyah was not Sufi btwdoe.

Rulers

I hope that you editors are still not fully out of mind, and we are actually might agree upon UAE being an Israeli plant nowadays doe. Saudi Arabia itself is not a country of kufr, it still holds the "country of tawhid" status evendoe the gov. is a pro-liberal plant. Ruling in Islam according to Islamic rulers (by sense, not accurate citation): "A Muslim should be a ruler, evendoe if it would be a Black slave. Even corrupted, but still Muslim ruler, you SHALL NOT go against him. Not bad if going against a ruler only in case if mentioned ruler is kafir/mushrik who won't go back to Islam." If Muslims of Andalus followed that, Reconquista wouldn't happen btwdoe.

Hanafi

And don't even begin with Hanafi Madhhab. It is either from Brimstone to Antimatter, because it allowed so much innovations to exist well nowadays and opened doors for philosophers (mentioned above too btw). Especially when Abu Hanifa presented that he mostly preferred opinion (Ar-Roy) above Hadeeth, even rejecting some of authentic ones. Doe also worth mentioning that Hanbali Madhhab is actually BASAWHITE: less innovations because of strictness. And it just it is it, capishe? Maliki, Ash-Shafii and Hanbali. Hanafi IS NOT INVITED. No, Hanafi was not even Tabi-Tabiin btw doe.

Say "No" to extremists (i.e. to Khawariji)

I condemn extremist movements like ISIS (a.k.a. Intelligence Service of Israel State), they are the Khawariji. Muhammad ibn Abdul-Wahhab was not a Khawariji, and whoever says otherwise is either a libtard or extremist. And no, it is not a political movement sponsored by kafirs, because it is a hoax that is profitable for Ibn Salman in his mission of libertarding Saudi Arabia.

Anal intercourse with women

Btw it is really worth mentioning that if you are not a Hadeeth rejecting kaffir, it is known that anal intercourse with a woman is considered as "small laata" (basically means "small sodomy"), thus making it haram too.

Creating nu page

Should i create the Islam positive prespective page out of my subuser page? - Labanis4ayran (talk | contribs) 14:37, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

yeah Enteryourusername (talk) 12:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

positive perspective for religion

We shiuld just make a positive perspective for religion as well at this point Aryan warrior (talk) 12:33, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

just delete this page

We don’t need positive perspective on a pedophilic religion we ALL know it’s true no beating around the bush. Muhammad is a pedophile and married a 6 year old no point in having any arguments and according to our lovely Muslim buddies he is the greatest man to ever live let that sink inBalenci1488 (talk)

Why is a christian vandalising this page?

how would he like it if muslims vandalised the positive perspective of christianity?

My aim is to provide objective facts on the topic of Islam. Sorry if the truthnukes hurt you ❤️ --Balenci1488 (talk) 21:11, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

move to SNCA namespace?

It only has 2 soysphere-related paragraphs, and we can remove them. –Gem 💎 (talk) 22:53, 16 August 2026 (UTC) 22:53, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

snca namespace is a fat nigger everyone complains about this site documenting nothing more than snca tranny faildoxes but when people want to write a funny soysphere take on some regular-day seca topic it's >NOOOOOOOOOOOO IT DOESN'T HAVE MY DEAD MEME PLASTERED OVER IT 500 TIMES AND LE HECCIN SOOT DIDN'T TALK ABOUT IT OR SOMETHING Soyoyuki (talk) 22:55, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Islam is the funny article, not this one. And even so, at least Christianity (supporter perspective) page has actual effort put into it, whereas this is just a boring stub. –Gem 💎 (talk) 22:56, 16 August 2026 (UTC) 22:56, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

i guess saar, i'm in favor of just raping the snca namespace Soyoyuki (talk) 22:56, 16 August 2026 (UTC)

Just delete this, Islam is pedophilic AND WE DONT NEED A POSITIVE PERSPECTIVE ON PEDOPHILIA --Balenci1488 (talk)

page should have a gallery

We should have IAS and NAS Islampilled GEMERALDS on this page. and also i made a thrembillion contributions to this page before i joined as arabsoyjaker btw, if that matters