Current mission: go through Special:NewPages and add appropriate articles to portals.
Talk:Supreme
jannies delete this page and ban me if you goon to xis posts — Preceding unsigned comment added by Brandt (talk • contribs)
- I guess he's notable enough to have his own page. Also while he's a disturbed fetishist, he is not a pedophile.
〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 22:40, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hey, I there's an article debunking the idea that people that post drawn depictions of sexualized kids somehow arent pedos, it's in the same wiki we edit together TheCatalan1977 (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- The current stance of the administration is that babyjak is an adult ABDL fetishist and therefore is not a drawing of a child. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 21:59, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- I don't care what this administration says. The law, and morals says otherwise: Babyjak has the proportions of a child, his height matches one of a baby, so does his head shape and body. "BUT HE HAS HAIR SO HE'S CLEARLY AN ADULT YOU HECKIN' ANTI", no faggot, there are babies born with body hair[1], and I was one btw, so I know what i'm talking about. Babyjak is also treated as a kid in the soysphere[2]. As you can see in the janny approved template (And you are one), Babyjak is widely considered to be a child. Australia bans sexual depictions of minors even in "fictional media", so does the European Union, and no "In the U.S it's legal" is not a fucking argument because many people in the sphere are not from BBC mutt Israel land, so fuck off with that shitty "argument". Specifically, it's considered 'p when characters share child like characteristics, lets see which ones Babyjak complies with: Big head, bigger than body, common in babies, small body and extremities, baby eyes, child-like behavior. Repent and face judgement, go sin no more TheCatalan1977 (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- what fucking baby has a beard and wears glasses you retard
- Nothing to do with award. I talked about body proportions faggot. No adult, not even with dwarfism looks like this, and if it does, its an extremely rare exception, and babyjak clearly does not match any trait or stereotype related with adults with dwarfism. You are using the same arguments lolicons use faggot. TheCatalan1977 (talk) 16:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- OH AND HAVE YOU FUCKING CONSIDERED THAT BABYJAK IS A BABY AND A SOYJAK AND ALL SOYJAKS HAVE BEARD AND GLASSES, NOT AS A SIGN OF THEIR AGE BUT RATHER BECAUSE THEY REPRESENT SOYBOYS? AND THAT YOU CAN LITERALLY PUT GLASSES ON BABIES WITH LANUGO? TheCatalan1977 (talk) 16:11, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- Oh you poor thing, not signing comments thinking I dont know who you are... TheCatalan1977 (talk) 16:18, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- what fucking baby has a beard and wears glasses you retard
- I don't care what this administration says. The law, and morals says otherwise: Babyjak has the proportions of a child, his height matches one of a baby, so does his head shape and body. "BUT HE HAS HAIR SO HE'S CLEARLY AN ADULT YOU HECKIN' ANTI", no faggot, there are babies born with body hair[1], and I was one btw, so I know what i'm talking about. Babyjak is also treated as a kid in the soysphere[2]. As you can see in the janny approved template (And you are one), Babyjak is widely considered to be a child. Australia bans sexual depictions of minors even in "fictional media", so does the European Union, and no "In the U.S it's legal" is not a fucking argument because many people in the sphere are not from BBC mutt Israel land, so fuck off with that shitty "argument". Specifically, it's considered 'p when characters share child like characteristics, lets see which ones Babyjak complies with: Big head, bigger than body, common in babies, small body and extremities, baby eyes, child-like behavior. Repent and face judgement, go sin no more TheCatalan1977 (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- The current stance of the administration is that babyjak is an adult ABDL fetishist and therefore is not a drawing of a child. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 21:59, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hey, I there's an article debunking the idea that people that post drawn depictions of sexualized kids somehow arent pedos, it's in the same wiki we edit together TheCatalan1977 (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
>he is not a pedophile.
sonion
- Well, he sure got the attention he wants. OopooPoopoo (talk) 23:21, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- MVST. NQT. GIGAQVQTE. Shadilay (talk) 23:24, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
dead[edit source]
>hasnt posted in over 3 weeks
packwatch nigga, aint nobaldi missing you Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 15:28, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
Why the fuck isn't he banned?[edit source]
We are talking about a fucking lol*faggot and pedocuck who posts babyjak 'p, who even knows where it's traced from. Werent we opposed to drawn 'p? TheCatalan1977 (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
and yes I know it's a booru user... but still, why booru mods haven't moved a finger when the 'party has proudly served in raids and 'oxxes against tranny niggerpedos TheCatalan1977 (talk) 18:14, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
- yes, xe should have been banned a long time ago. but now xe is gone for good, i guess the shalalas that are the admins think that there is no point in banning xer anymore. Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 16:02, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- This nametoilet isn't even relevant anymore just move on. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 21:59, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
