User talk:~Chud34798
From Soyjak Wiki, the free ensoyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
There's a bot that automatically adds the {{inactive}} template to inactive user's user pages, you know? North (talk) 12:21, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- It's broken, albeit. It's not a documented task of the bot. ~Chud34798 (talk) 12:24, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
hey[edit source]
Thanks for pointing that out. North (talk) 10:13, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
barnstar for you[edit source]
| The Chad Barnstar | ||
| For being an unbothered aryan adding {{Inactive}} to all the inactive users.[Hopefully we can make the bot do this automatically soon] 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 11:59, 18 April 2026 (UTC) |
Your edit on Shemmy[edit source]
You realise they could change the redirect location at any time? North (talk) 09:46, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
- I didn't know that was forbidden. I thought I could put those links in now, since they don't redirect to a splinter, and then have them suppressed if and when the redirect location changed. Also, I don't participate in any hostile offsite communities like the block reason says; I just happen to know about them. ~Chud34798 (talk) 10:11, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
- Be very careful about what links you decide to put in article, a very common issue is pedos sniping domains as soon as they stop being renewed by the person that owns them, supression also takes time and absoluetly ruins the history so should not be relied upon. The rule you mentions also forbids participation as well as advertising disruptive communities. I've gone ahead and adjusted your ban as no harm was done in the end. 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 10:21, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
- I still think this ban is bullshit because it's based on something that might happen in the future, but whatever. Hopefully, this forces me to try to distance myself from the Soysphere, which is getting rapidly overrun by failtrolls that post all types of niggerbrim without any form of punishment. ~Chud34798 (talk) 10:38, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
- Be very careful about what links you decide to put in article, a very common issue is pedos sniping domains as soon as they stop being renewed by the person that owns them, supression also takes time and absoluetly ruins the history so should not be relied upon. The rule you mentions also forbids participation as well as advertising disruptive communities. I've gone ahead and adjusted your ban as no harm was done in the end. 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 10:21, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
THANK YOU[edit source]
THANK YOU FOR FIXING MY ARTICLE ON APRIL 18TH. I DECLARE YOU PRINCE OF SOYJAK PARTY OVER THE LOSER QUOTE. Soylord (talk) 04:16 , 2 May 2026 (UTC)