CURRENT MISSION: Conclude the 2026 soyjak.party hack page, aswell as any pages relating to it, such as the Summer 2026 Crisis page.
Update Quotecord with any relevant info. See the blackboard for more info.

Talk:Chinny: Difference between revisions

From Soyjak Wiki, the free ensoyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Rigby (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:
::::I assumed so, but why not just say chinny instead of allowing people to know about the url? {{:User:Rigby/Signature}} 23:43, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
::::I assumed so, but why not just say chinny instead of allowing people to know about the url? {{:User:Rigby/Signature}} 23:43, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
:::::I mentioned the URL specifically because salt probably doesn't know about that site. --<b><span style="color:cyan">[[File:Gemjak.png|25px|link=User:Gem|Gem]] [[User:Gem|Gem]]</span></b> ([[User talk:Gem|talk]]) 23:45, 14 August 2026 (UTC) 23:45, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
:::::I mentioned the URL specifically because salt probably doesn't know about that site. --<b><span style="color:cyan">[[File:Gemjak.png|25px|link=User:Gem|Gem]] [[User:Gem|Gem]]</span></b> ([[User talk:Gem|talk]]) 23:45, 14 August 2026 (UTC) 23:45, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
::::::Oh ok. {{:User:Rigby/Signature}} 23:49, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
== No Salt, no ==
== No Salt, no ==
We shouldnt document failtroll splinters. You only give them attention, the one they seek. I dont agree with Cobblestone with most stuff, but banning hostile splinter mentions was keyed from him [[User:TheCatalan1977|TheCatalan1977]] ([[User talk:TheCatalan1977|talk]]) 11:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
We shouldnt document failtroll splinters. You only give them attention, the one they seek. I dont agree with Cobblestone with most stuff, but banning hostile splinter mentions was keyed from him [[User:TheCatalan1977|TheCatalan1977]] ([[User talk:TheCatalan1977|talk]]) 11:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:49, 14 August 2026

You're allowed to document this, the sharty allows it. Soyoyuki (talk) 09:55, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

I told you, both sides can't agree
@Soyoyuki just email salt about the current status of ch*d.win. if we receive no confirmation/denial within few days then I'll assume it's allowed. --Gem Gem (talk) 10:09, 14 August 2026 (UTC) 10:09, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
tbh i don't really understand what's so bad about it. From what I know, their owner was a foodist and they joke about chinnyplus (CP), but like the same thing can be said about the fooey and sncapedia but they're allowed Gzard (talk) 10:25, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
the first iteration was full of foodists and skibidi farms users, also the last time i went to it (the second iteration), it was full of "ironic" pedophilia GapeNewell (talk) 10:29, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
i went on it like an hour ago and saw loli stuff maybe some of the people there are good but idk dni Glisterald (talk) 10:30, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
the owner isn't a foodist, allegedly is an oldfag from /pol/ and it's an OPSEC demon who literally takes cocaine, the site isn't filled with foodists anymore but you can find very questionable stuff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alson2 (talkcontribs)
>loli
isn't it your favourite? Gzard (talk) 10:37, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Now you're projecting? Now I remember why I didn't touch this site for a long time — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alson2 (talkcontribs)
I was talking about @Glisterald doe Gzard (talk) 10:55, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Oh, sorry but i thought this was because of the infamy I have on the 'ru, I don't even post anime that much. Alson2 (talk) 11:00, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
What’s the point of censoring the URL if anyone with common sense can understand what that url is. User:Rigby (talk) 23:38, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
@Rigby Typing the link triggers an abuse filter than bans you. Try it! --Gem Gem (talk) 23:39, 14 August 2026 (UTC) 23:39, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
I assumed so, but why not just say chinny instead of allowing people to know about the url? User:Rigby (talk) 23:43, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
I mentioned the URL specifically because salt probably doesn't know about that site. --Gem Gem (talk) 23:45, 14 August 2026 (UTC) 23:45, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Oh ok. User:Rigby (talk) 23:49, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

No Salt, no

We shouldnt document failtroll splinters. You only give them attention, the one they seek. I dont agree with Cobblestone with most stuff, but banning hostile splinter mentions was keyed from him TheCatalan1977 (talk) 11:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

blah blah blah, its a wiki you fat scum, its about documenting everything, even sncapedia has a page about them
>NOOOO salty salgt plea dont give them attotien — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mushroom (talkcontribs)

Well, to be honest. It's the Quotist brainwashing that led me to believe that.
I wanted to make an article on that horrible splinter. So. I'll copy the entire SNCApedia article here and write over it TheCatalan1977 (talk) 12:06, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Wait for my import instead. It's more up to date. Soyoyuki (talk) 12:11, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Shut up idiot you're not writing over any articles especially one as detrimentally succinct this article needs to be. MFW Anti-Quotist brainwashing makes me a fucking moron who doesn't know anything about the negligent evil that feeds on this platform, fat boy @TheCatalan1977 --Funnybenny18 | Fuck you Wikisluts (Complain about my legible writing) 21:02, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

how about we dont

Lets not make an article about this splinter. Especially considering who uses it.~Chud51210 (talk) 12:43, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

How about yes? Since we made so many pages about splinters and we always say if its hostile, we should go there, or not. 25Wholesome52 (talk) 12:51, 14 August 2026
we have an article on the kuzzy why not make an article of the chinny then AwardedAccountAward (talk) 12:53, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

okay then

if we allow documenting the chinny, then that should be where we draw the line. i do NOT want splinters like skajyos' imageboard documented here Col. Sharecropper (talk) 14:32, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, inherently pedophilic splinters like that will always be banned. G-Man (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
How do we define "inherently pedophilic?" I agree that Skajyos' splinter is inherently pedophilic, but we have this page plus pages about 8chan and Eka's Portal, and those are full of pedoshit. Is the difference the intent of the creator? Because in that case I'm pretty sure Hotwheels was a self-admitted pedophile. Soyfield (Talk PageContributionsEmail) 20:58, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
skayjos site exists for the sole purpose of posting loli porn, posting soylita, discussing "MAP" rights, and posting pictures of actual children. I think that differs greatly from 8chan, which has pedophilic boards but doesn't make that the site focus, or the chinny, which simply allows pedophilic jokes.
That's fair. Also Skajyos is basically a foodist so we don't want to give xim any unnecessary attention. Soyfield (Talk PageContributionsEmail) 23:41, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
skajyos splinter is considered hostile by every other splinter in existence, so thats where we draw the line

>chinny page

Uhhh okay i guess this is alright i dont know Fuggenjerdee (talk) 18:31, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

atp just unlock the page

the whole import thing is taking too long, just let me write it

I keep getting distracted sorry, i'm doing it right now. Soyoyuki (talk) 20:50, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
nigga just pass the ball--Mushroom (talk) 22:49, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Necessary evils

Just keep the domain and any hints to it under lock and key. Everything else relevant should be documented as per the SNECApedias --Funnybenny18 | Fuck you Wikisluts (Complain about my legible writing) 21:02, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

And be sure to use the {{NotAd}} header. Soyfield (Talk PageContributionsEmail) 22:14, 14 August 2026 (UTC)
Read my thingy on the Soyjak Wiki:Janny noticeboard. The Chinny will fall under gray area, as it already technically does on the Sharty. Soyoyuki (talk) 22:54, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

fake name

Give it a fake name so we can document it without the risk of somebody googling it and finding the name. kinda like the brappy of whatever it was called. --General Niggnin (talk) 23:46, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

Call it the chity? idk this would prevent the most amount of risk of people finding it --General Niggnin (talk) 23:47, 14 August 2026 (UTC)