User talk:Gzard

>The account ‪Gzard‬ has been 'nished by ‪Broot‬ for the following reason(s):

Rule G3a - You WILL NOT vandalize Soyjak Wiki pages: Repeat offender

Welcome

Welcome to der 'ki.

• Useful links:
  • Beginner's guide
  • Rules
  • Manual of Style
  • About the Soyjak Wiki

Have fun editing der 'ki, newGOD.

---

North (talk) 14:22, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Chud Barnstar
		getting banned 2 times TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Nigga

Fuck you nigga you made my clitty leak my clitty is leaking ~Chud4185 (talk)

what did i do Gzard (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

I'm so sorry bro :( ~Chud9811 (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

Why did you vandalized my user-page?

Not cool man. Kyrgyz (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

I didn't vandalise it. Adding user templates is not a vandal behaviour, I have merely indicated your poor english skills. Gzard (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Edit

'pologies for reverting your edit on Broot, assumed it was removal of information --Carrot (talk) 17:45, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi

Kike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohrthaeos (talk • contribs)

I need to evaluate you now. Post "gzard" here please. https://soyjak.st/q/thread/204132.html Thanks. Cobblestone (talk) 12:50, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Done Gzard (talk) 13:16, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

what happened btw Gzard (talk) 14:46, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

watch where are you going, little buddy. TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 17:57, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

You advertised the Shroom. North (talk) 17:40, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

you guys could've just warned me instead of 'nishing me. I asked about linking shroom on the noticeboardGzard (talk) 07:04, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Unblocked North (talk) 07:08, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

trvke

trvke that nobody cares

warning

stop advertising the shroom nigga, you don't want to be (possibly perma) banned right? TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 08:59, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

meds i wasn't advertising for shroom after i got 'nished for the first time Gzard (talk) 10:06, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

you sure? TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 10:37, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

yeah. If you refer to the Broot#Brootbaiting section i referred to linking and supporting shroom as a way to bait Broot since he's in a "war" with it. I don't even use shroom Gzard (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

ah, so it was a clittyban GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEG TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Well you obviously are since you leaked when we removed the link from the article, come out of closet nushroomgay --Broot (talk) 11:19, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

meds i didn't leak, i just saw plenty of confusion amongst soyim regarding the status of shroom, i linked it for the first time, some phono removed it, i linked second time and then i asked about it on the noticeboard, north said it was fine if the admins were fine with it, and since the link stayed up for days or even a week i assumed the fact that cobble and others already saw it. Like i didn't shill for shroom or anything like that, the only thing i did is i said that it was fine to use it Gzard (talk) 11:24, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Whatever you say, removing the shroomslut parts from section --Broot (talk) 11:27, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

As long as you don't link splinters you should be fine. Cobblestone (talk) 10:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

never did and never will Gzard (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Yo

Welcome back.

Cool Alpha User

You defended my rusty page so youre aryan or something 〜 Truecel43000

Kike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ohrthaeos (talk • contribs)

You are now an approver!

Congrats on becoming an approver (mediator). As an approver, you are responsible for approving or denying incoming new edits from nusois.

Please check the following as a guideline on your basic operations, soyteen.

• Approver policy
• Rules

Also, if an edit is rule-breaking, you should contact a janny to check it out through their talk page to take appropriate action. Good luck!

Cobblestone (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

welcome to the club dude TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 14:14, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

💀Gzard (talk) 14:30, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Rejected template

Do not use it, instead leave a normal comment on the user's talk page. North (talk) 20:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

>Do not use it, instead leave a normal comment on the user's talk page. North (talk) 20:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Gzard (talk) 20:14, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Really, why not? This template is pretty good and gets the point across Gzard (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Niggerhell source code, and the way it works makes it hard for recipients to reply as the [edit source] button takes the user here. North (talk) 20:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

I don't think it's that big of a problem to completely trash a pretty good template Gzard (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

It's just far better to leave a normal comment on the user's talk page. Please don't use the {{rejected}} template again. North (talk) 20:36, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Inquiry

Why was my edit rejected? Your opinion on it being "ugly" is subjective. It was entirely relevant to the article. Remember, you're supposed to encourage productive contributions. Thanks. Pachka sigarets (talk)

The quote was relevant but it was put right in the middle of an article. Gzard (talk) 20:17, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

So maybe you should move it instead of deleting the edit as a whole. Pachka sigarets (talk)

you do that --Statis (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

I can't edit a pending edit, i can only either reject it or approve it. Gzard (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

So approve it and edit it afterwards. Pachka sigarets (talk)

I feel like that it's better for the nueditors to learn how to edit pages Gzard (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

sorry for being an annoying prick geg I was trying to bait you but you're actually really chill Pachka sigarets (talk)

Also see - Soyjak_Wiki:Bad_formatting Gzard (talk) 20:23, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Chad Barnstar
		for shitting on north on his talk page

rejected template

Hi, please don't manually bring back archived templates like you did here, it was archived for a reason. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

on User:Gzard/Rejected

Please do not use this template on people's talk pages, we've already agreed to archive it. If you want to bring it back you should have a discussion about it on it's talk page. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

this dude really wants to bring back some useless garbage template with niggerhell source code geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeg TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 16:47, 24 June 2026 (UTC)