Talk:Kuz

Stop vandalizing this article chudcel, its not supposed to be pro or anti kuz, take your grifting elsewhere — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.244.54.83 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 30 January 2022

Didn't read any of this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gem (talk • contribs) 18:36, 30 January 2022

SOOOT LOCK THIS

ITS FULL OF HARMFUL MISINFO WHICH IS DANGEROUS TO OUR DEMOCRACY AND BUILDING BACK BETTER — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.126.58.46 (talk • contribs) 19:25, 5 February 2022

sources

>In 2021 he bought Gurochan, and has offered 3k for Lainchan, 7k for 7chan, and 21k for 8chan.moe. source? proof? do you have a study to back this up? (unironically) if you have any archived lainchan threads about him please share. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakky (talk • contribs) 08:43, 13 February 2022

How to research (stalk) kuz

Since this page is the hottest gem on the 'ki right now and im a big contributing factor I will share my knowledge on making gem pages like this

For kuz, here are some good places to start.

info.kolyma.org (archive.org and archive.is has good info)

kuz.lol (mostly deleted, check 'chives)

kolyma.org (contains info in both current and archived versions)

devyach.net (broken but generally has good info, check 'chives)

heyuri.net threads (check their /q/ board in the archives)

vidlii.com (search "kuz")

kissu.moe/qa/res/4165 (literally thousands of posts about kuz in the archived thread)

His profiles online

twitter.com/yurimkuznetsov

vidlii.com/user/kuz

(add more if you know pls) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiny lemon cock (talk • contribs) 00:40, 15 February 2022

Rychuvak

is there some additional source about this that wasn't linked? because the wiki page is totally different and introduces new details that weren't in the github, like the 31538 number, where is that from? it also says in the github that the bitcoins were stolen in 2018 when the platform shut down and that 250k were stolen, as opposed to the numbers and dates written in the 'iki. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakky (talk • contribs) 13:56, 15 February 2022

can a rule be made that vandalism is allowed but only on this page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Son of the mask (talk • contribs) 12:32, 17 February 2022

kuz is a pedophile and edits his own page to make himself look better. he leaks the ips of soyjakkers and owns an imageboard for anime loli gore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 04:16, 25 February 2022

Nigger you are filling this page with your Homosexual coal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SneederFeeder (talk • contribs) 04:18, 25 February 2022

Kuz is gay not me this is from an unbiased POV — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 04:26, 25 February 2022

It's still pretty faggy and coal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SneederFeeder (talk • contribs) 04:53, 25 February 2022

soot delete this page, discord sisters keep vandalizing it with gay porn — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.17.18.62 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 1 March 2022

I will fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SneederFeeder (talk • contribs) 03:20, 1 March 2022

I am not from Discord. The Kuz approved Kuz page is not in the spirit of the wiki. If you look at the Soot page it’s not unbiased in the slightest, and that’s because it’s actually written by soyjak.party users and not some brigade of gay russians. I’m okay with my edit not being the page but I’m not going to allow this page to continue being KolymaNET propaganda that most soyteens disagree with — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 19:28, 1 March 2022

Better yet, lock this page. Discord sisters can't stop coaling it up or commiting historical revisionism which serves mostly a delusional soot apologist agenda — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.242.197.202 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 1 March 2022

Fags, the Kuz's page is supposed to be serious and neutral compared to the others. And also how is he "pro-Kuz"? There are several parts that show his operations with the NSS against the 'party. And also, despite Soot's page don't be biased at all, at least has several real events, and it's not full of Homo fantasies and traced gay porn. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SneederFeeder (talk • contribs) 19:44, 1 March 2022

It pisses Kuz off, thats why its funny. Case in point. Also, if you're genuinely just another soyteen, I want you to notice how they keep accusing me of being from the soyjak cafe discord. That has been a Kuz gaslighting technique since the beginning. THEY want this page gone more than anybody, because they hate when they aren't able to make Kuz look like a "complicated character" when the truth is that hes just an attention whore faggot that deserves to be mocked. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 23:22, 1 March 2022

>ITZ MAKE LE KUZ SEETHE I don't like that Ruskie fag, but I also don't like your gay shit. Simple as. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SneederFeeder (talk • contribs) 23:32, 1 March 2022

it does, you clearly hate it. Still don't think he deserves the satisfaction from having a real page about him when everybody hates him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 23:40, 1 March 2022

Ok, then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SneederFeeder (talk • contribs) 23:49, 1 March 2022

Alright, I accept this. We met in the middle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 00:58, 2 March 2022

I don't hate him and think it's funny how you suddenly come into this community and try to dictate what articles we now have to like or dislike — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.244.77.73 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 2 March 2022

You don’t have an account, you are a puppet IP used by kuz. it’s obvious — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 02:04, 2 March 2022

Portal Page

The Kuz page should be kept this way as a compromise. There is no realistic way to keep a Kuz page neutral considering the lack of active editors we have. Also, the user who reverted the Kuz page back to the long pro-kuz page was just some throwaway IP which Kuz is known to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 01:27, 3 April 2022

Not up to date

This page is cluttered, and its a mixture of a bunch of negative and positive claims about Kuz made when the drama was at its peak in February and March. This page needs a massive overhaul in order to be unbiased. I recommend we go back to the Portal page model we had before, it was funny too. I liked the part about there being multiple pages about Kuz as to not say which one is official.

We also need to cut out a lot of fluff, a lot of the events mentioned here are things nobody cares about and holds little significance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Soystein (talk • contribs) 18:57, 12 May 2022

Eduardo

Since kuz bans any discussion of this on the website you can freely do it here.

We should message eduardo and find out if it's real kuz or if he is only impersonating him

^Link his social media i will try. Pretty pissed at kuz for allowing this kind of censorship despite breaking no rules. No different than lolkek et al were.

vk: https://vk.com/id278353286 instagram: https://www.instagram.com/f0_eduardo_tz/

Use a translator like deepl.com

Can someone with account dump all the images and collages? ^i already have his entire instagram saved

i think his name might be "eduard foltz" and not eduardo since it says eduard on his vk account and his instagram name is Эдуард Фольц (Eduard Foltz) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.70.38.75 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 3 August 2022

The IP of the person clearing the page is located in Tennessee, the exact place Kuz lives in.

^also if you check the history its full of bbc spam shit

Why even make a new page? Why don't just use the Talk:Kuz page?

Please link some generals about him like the 'arms thread here

141.126.58.46 is definitely 100% kuz just look at post history and since it correlates with place where he lives I wouldn't doubt that it is his real ip. Nice opsec eduardo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.131.104.79 (talk • contribs) 3 August 2022

^he's deleting every single post showing it and banning them. i doubt he would do this if it was some random soyteens ip — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a02:6c8:8000:22::2 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 3 August 2022

Check jakparty.soy for more eduardo/kuz info — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.125.203.31 (talk • contribs) 00:05, 4 August 2022

^that place kinda sucks dawg any other generals we have besides the now locked 'arm thread? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a0b:f4c2:3::85 (talk • contribs) 03:17, 4 August 2022

Today was a pathetic showing for kuz and his mods. I myself saw how they repeatedly deleted (&banned) actual serious content that was well within the rules while later being applauded from kuz with 100% certainty. If this continues i'm sure more people will drop the sharty and or switch sides. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a0b:f4c2:3::85 (talk • contribs) 03:26, 4 August 2022

But i suggest you to stop shilling your sites, it gives us honest sharty teens a bad rep and makes kuz immediately assume everyone speaking out against him is a shill. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2a0b:f4c2::25 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 4 August 2022

>*Sharty MEN

Fix'd — Preceding unsigned comment added by 135.125.204.179 (talk • contribs) 03:45, 4 August 2022

thinly veiled excuse to shill dead site — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.126.58.46 (talk • contribs) 23:54, 4 August 2022

To cliffsend on lolcow.farm:

Theres a difference between strict standards on notability and just writing maliciously false and blatantly disprovable lies into the article. If you think there is anything of genuine value or truth in that thread, add it into the article yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.126.58.46 (talk • contribs) 00:11, 28 August 2022

Added new section - question about the article

Ive written quite a bit of this article and was wondering if we should include info about kuz's stuff outside the sharty (like his bibanon article) or just keep it related to the sharty. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobdagem44 (talk • contribs) 02:35, 30 August 2022

This article sucks

Its not informative, it doesnt have anything interesting, funny, or worth while. Its literally just here to give these people advertising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cliffsend (talk • contribs) 19:14, 30 August 2022

mfw the jakparty shill is THIS mindbroken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.126.58.46 (talk • contribs) 20:03, 30 August 2022

Kuzbots FEAR the Jakparty freedom front, free respublik of whistleblowers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cliffsend (talk • contribs) 21:06, 30 August 2022

This article suc-ACK!

>Its not informative, it doesnt have anything interes-ACK! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coal miner (talk • contribs) 21:08, 30 August 2022

Article name

His online alias is still "kuz", only real life name was changed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gem (talk • contribs) 09:03, 9 October 2022

article in need of update and more contributors?

I think we should encourage more people to update this article and make it have reliable sources, up-to-date information, etc. We just need to make sure it doesnt become a propaganda piece for or against kuz. Gone are the days of edit warring this page, kuz is no longer the edgy, controversial character he used to be, its time this page has a major makeover as most of the information is just somewhat outdated or irrelevant stuff about the second soyvil war. --Cobdagem44 (talk) 09:31, 19 December 2022 (MST)

accidentally removed your edits angeleno

sorry, can you add them back? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobdagem44 (talk • contribs) 05:47, 22 January 2023

Sure, no problem. Angeleno (talk) 00:59, 22 January 2023 (EST)

has kuz ever commented about this page?

Curious what his opinions are on it. It rivals the bibanon article in terms of detail. Certainly larger than the heyuri article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobdagem44 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 22 January 2023

He briefly talked about it during the first SOTS livestream: >I think my article specifically, well, I mean, what can I say. I'll keep my opinions about that to myself. No conflicts of interest here. Angeleno (talk) 00:59, 22 January 2023 (EST)

Very informational. Thank you kuz.

... does he know what a conflict of interest is? --Cobdagem44 (talk) 01:01, 22 January 2023 (EST)

sobot

>sobot real even doe he just a kolyma sleeper agent meant to secude the sharty — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gemsick (talk • contribs) 06:19, 22 January 2023

legal warning

added a legal warning at the top of the article, can someone format it better for me? thanks either way --Coal miner (talk) 15:08, 22 January 2023 (EST)

I don't think it's necessary. That's what the disclaimer page is for. Angeleno (talk) 15:50, 22 January 2023 (EST)

I ♥ kuz 76.89.155.131 00:32, 27 March 2023 (EST)

Angeleno, please lock this article.

In light of the news about kuz I think you should edit this article to add a respectful and sourced section about the recent news and then lock it to stop vandals. --Cobdagem44 (talk) 21:18, 17 May 2023 (EST)

I've temporarily locked it the article to non-admins. If anyone wishes to have AllPageEdit and be able to modify the page (and I trust you), post here. Angeleno (talk) 21:51, 17 May 2023 (EST)

kuz samefagging geg G-Man (talk) 18:21, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

So outdated

With kolymas dissolution, kuzs 2nd adminship, aids diagnosis, etc, so much of this page is outdated. Theres even some soot era renmants left over. Should have a total makeover which focuses on kuzs relationship to the site — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobdagem44 (talk • contribs) 15:15, 15 July 2023

Soot's page is also outdated, the chronicle has generally not been updated past 2021. It's common that in the craft of writing, having structured the article around current events, updating it would require almost the same effort as re-writing it from scratch. It's often easier to just add a new updated section that doesn't connect to the others, the equivalent to sweeping the problem under the rug. It erodes the cohesion of the article and is all too common as a wiki page ages. Very few wiki editors signed up to re-write entire pages for free. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cliffsend (talk • contribs) 20:48, 15 July 2023

Normie Here: Who exactly is Kuz IRL?

sorry, I am clueless as I exclusively know Cob — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niggward (talk • contribs) 00:57, 14 January 2024

It's a mystery, see Kuz's Identity — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gem Control (talk • contribs) 01:06, 14 January 2024

Kuzjak

Is it a soyjak or NAS? It was always considered NAS and was even banned from booru (except for open mouth images), but after Kuz bought soyjack.party he forcibly designated it as IAS. This should be considered as part of the Dekuzification policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gem (talk • contribs) 11:02, 28 April 2024

kuzs steam

https://steamcommunity.com/id/syskuznet/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Irisahqw (talk • contribs) 01:33, 26 October 2024

going forward

i updated the article to excise all the larped elements, keeping only what we know publically and what froot/doll told us. do you think the old article should be moved to a perspective or something? Cobblestone (talk) 06:43, 28 November 2024 (EST)

Stephan Kuznets

He looks nothing like Kuz's selfie and he was 16-17 years old during Kuz's era. I don't think he was actually involved in Kolyma stuff, so his dox probably shouldn't be posted at this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Friede (talk • contribs) 15:33, 28 November 2024

ok, do you think that kuz is Carter Kuznets then? was the "stefan" name purely out of this cell tower guy's facebook? Cobblestone (talk) 10:35, 28 November 2024 (EST)

good idea though, yeah lets just do "Carter" with no surname for now until more info comes to light Cobblestone (talk) 10:44, 28 November 2024 (EST)

Kuznets only has one son old enough to use the internet, older photos of whom I posted above Friede (talk) 12:35, 28 November 2024 (EST)

alright, then we could keep the mention of kuznets with the disclaimer or do away with it completely. feel free to change anything you want — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cobblestone (talk • contribs) 17:39, 28 November 2024

Well… Enteryourusername (talk) 21:07, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Links for cobblestone about kuz if he wishes to write these in

Proof that Kuz works with goth a known sharty ‘p spammer: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/soyjak-party-the-sharty.145349/page-663#post-19537974 Kuzs dox: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/soyjak-party-the-sharty.145349/page-326#post-17857123 Also apparently according to max Kuz was in a court case about him doing sexual shit to minors.

if you didn’t connect the dots I will tell you. Kuz worked with ‘p spammers and stirred up shit in the sharty to force soot to sell the site to him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CobGOD (talk • contribs) 20:11, 28 November 2024

i used that page but kuz's "dox" in it using the cell tower guy isn't really reliable so it was taken out. froot allegedly has the real full dox so if that is ever released we'll truly know (see the section above). the kiwifarms thread with the magicord shit is useful though, thanks Cobblestone (talk) 18:30, 28 November 2024 (EST)

Please use "Kuz" instead of "kuz"

This page, and its contents... /calm/ing???NO, FUCK YOU AND DIE

I don't care if Kuz preferred his name to be fully uncapitalized, or if Froot or Doll preferred to to use his name fully uncapitalized, or if whatever janny you're trying to dicksuck preferred his name fully uncapitalized, or even if YOU preferred his name fully uncapitalized. Having every mention of Kuz in his own article be completely lowercased to "kuz" throughout most of the article when THE ARTICLE NAME ITSELF HAS HIS NAME CAPITALIZED is so RETARDED. Kuz is a PROPER NOUN since he was a PERSON, and you should ALWAYS CAPITALIZE PROPER NOUNS AND NAMED. Seeing "kuz" throughout the article uncapitalized PISSES ME OFF and TRIGGERS MY OCD. FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU FUCK YOU!!!!!!! I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU I HATE YOU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Even if having Kuz uncapitalized is supposed to be a jab towards Kuz since he's a pedophile (which I'm not denying, he WAS a pedophile) his name should STILL be capitalized. Because it just should okay?

GunsOfTheSoytriots2 (talk) 13:50, 19 May 2025 (EST)

@grok summarize this angry post it is too wordy Cobblestone (talk) 12:52, 19 May 2025 (EST)

it's not a jab he just preferred that, it's an online nickname after all — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.219.112.216 (talk • contribs) 20:18, 19 May 2025

Did Kuz played a friendly match against India?

I was searching for a friendly match since 1955, it was USSR 11–1 India, I wanted to know who are the players who played the match,

but suddenly "Yuriy Kuznetsov" did, he was playing for Dynamo Moscow during that time. So that means that Kuz was playing all along? Or I was just thinking all of the sudden. KuzDudezy 21:42, 27 February 2025 (BRT)

OY VEY THE GOYIM KNOW! SHUT IT DOWN! — Preceding unsigned comment added by GauntletThrown (talk • contribs) 02:21, 29 May 2026

Doing some forensic work

I've found that Carter's Steam account is misattributed to somebody completely different (which resulted in people assuming he was from Memphis, Tennessee).

His ACTUAL Steam account is the following UID64:

76561198834904372

https://steamid.uk/profile/76561198834904372 (Check name history and comments)

https://web.archive.org/web/20240313064909/https://steamid.uk/profile/76561198834904372 ('chive just in case, as you can remove username and other information about your profile by request on this website) 323 (talk) 00:25, 18 July 2025 (EST)

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^seething kuzist, Sootists VVON Anonymous SAGE! (talk) 09:27, 26 July 2025 (EST)

added Cobblestone (talk) 02:41, 27 July 2025 (EST)

This article isn't very good

To be honest, it isn't very informative and just calls kuz a pedo every other sentence like we get it bro Cobsonant (talk) 06:47, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

you're free to edit it lol Cat (talk). 08:48, 18 September 2025 (UTC)

This article needs a gemming up campaign

We should try to get interviews from former and current staff members to know everything we can find out about Kuz

Also most of the articles concerning events in 2023 are just a mess of contradicting info and we need to organize our sources and get more actual interviews

Metalgearsoywalker (talk) 23:53, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Those interviews often contradict each other too. The fact is that there is very little hard evidence about Kuz; most of the 2023 action happened behind the scenes and what we did end up getting is heavily filtered and politicized. --Ay Tone (talk) 05:17, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

pre-ownership kuz information

documentation of the soot-doll era in general is pretty terrible right now, but i think one of the first places that can be gemmed up is the history of kuz's involvement with the party before the great purchase. https://wiki.bibanon.org/Yuri_Kuznetsov_(kuz) has a ton of useful (THOUGH a lot of it is uncited because of the wayback exclusion) info about kuz's early involvement with the party. i would edit it myself but this page is a mess as is so i dont really know where to start. Greenfag (Talk) 02:04, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

>Most users regard Kuz as: BRIMSTONE

I've literally seen half of the sharty heil salt and heil kuz in like the past few days. Simply not true. I'll put the {{Bias}} template on this page for now. Kuz is obviously a pedo but some of the stuff here is just quotist/frootist propaganda. Seperate art from the artist. Soyoyuki (talk) 11:55, 14 August 2026 (UTC)

keyed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mushroom (talk • contribs) 11:57, 14 August 2026

this faggot is a pedophile and if you ever said you liked him during the quote era you would get bullied and called a pedophile

there was a massive switch up ever since salt took over now all of a sudden kuz is no longer an evil pedophile anymore why are people now calling him good fuck kuz Miso (talk) 12:07, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

Schizos call the kuzcord Quotist propaganda, and they ride on the fact that Salt said that his favorite admin is kuz Poop and niggers dying (talk to me here) 12:09, 9 September 2026 (UTC)

>the admin stopped forcing the discord propaganda so now people don't care about the discord propaganda

WAAOOOOWW!!! Soyoyuki (talk) 09:45, 12 September 2026 (UTC)

Potential Kuz or even Eduardo Reddit account?

https://www.reddit.com/user/EduardoFoltz/ I'm 99% sure this is some random soyteen larping as Kuz AND Eduardo but i'm posting this here for further research to be conducted in case this is Kuz larping as Eduardo Foltz again or even the real Eduardo Foltz larping as Kuz. This could be relevant to Kuz's page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~Chud71551 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 14 September 2026

who reverted the changes

Title --Unsigned edit by Mushroom (talk)

Just check the revision history, dumb kuzzyfag. The edits as a whole weren't entirely bad, but nobody's fooled by the efforts to claim Kuz wasn't a pedophile. Even back before he purchased the website, everyone knew who he was (again look at the revision history). The most honest thing to claim was that he was an edgy 'teen who loved attention, created the best era of the site thanks to his love and history with imageboard culture, but said history and love for attention resulted in him becoming a pedophile. Having respect for him since all the other admins after him were dogshit and hated the site and its users is fine, but don't actually try to pretend he's innocent, you look retarded. --~Chud31287 (talk) 22:44, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

did you read with your ass or something? Mushroom (talk) 23:02, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Yes, and my asscheeks can clearly see you covering up for Kuz being a pedophile, claiming "bias", as if leaving things ambiguous and dry rather than stating the obvious truth is somehow better. You've made a ton of pro-kuz edits across the site with your literal first edits being about kuz, stop larping nusoi. --~Chud60183 (talk) 23:08, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

1. Log in and

2. “ummm look at this very real evidence of Kuz cord, we don’t know it’s him but he said very weid stuffy so it definitely is!”

https://soybooru.com/post/view/30134 Mushroom (talk) 23:28, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

That other Chud editor who posted the Kuzcord link isn't me, I don't have an account. No, saying the hundreds of messages sent in a 'cord (which Doll confirmed were real) were falsified by Quote for some mysterious reason doesn't fool anyone, either. Nor does it explain the takeover, Heyuri, the IPs linked to kuz posting CP and "magically" getting unbanned, Kaguya using a Kolyma email, etc. You also aren't able to explain how everyone, minus Froot, would collectively be so obsessed with Kuz that they'd go this far to lie about him for no benefit. Nobody's fooled nusoi. Stop larping. --~Chud60183 (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

not only was i able to confirm firsthand that the kuzcord msgs are real, but they proved that he was also grooming sobot Cobblestone (talk) 23:38, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

I’m not going to have some “wiki war” over this, it’s believe it’s stupid. But a lot of sections in the page need Snopes like cmon

”goth and Kuz had a discord server together etc etc”

without any proof whatsoever + not even a link to some bs kiwi farms page Mushroom (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

sure but you were trying to bundle stuff like that in with whitewashing/censoring him being a pedophile and thought no one would notice Cobblestone (talk) 23:36, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

still absolutely zero mention of Froot gigaquoting pedophilia on his page years after it happened btw Soyoyuki (talk) 23:41, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

go and add that if you want but don't try to pretend that your goat isn't a cp spammer and groomer, damn! Cobblestone (talk) 23:42, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Cobblestone, I don’t think people give a shit anymore about what kuz did especially with that one recent archive thread on the sharty

yes he did that and yes he was a good admin - (according to some people) Mushroom (talk) 23:45, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

People not giving a shit anymore because it's been years doesn't mean him being a pedophile is suddenly now untrue or unproven and should be purged from the page. That archive thread should have included a link to that alleged email claiming he was 19 and that he had since moved on from imageboard culture and spam, since it would have been Kuz effectively admitting what he did and that his whole identity was (obviously) a larp. Otherwise, the notion that Kuz is totally innocent is split between larping nusois who weren't there for the kuz era, samefags, and people who are doing it just because they hate Froot and Quote which is keyed. --~Chud60183 (talk) 23:55, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

groomer but he was also apparently only like 16-19 at the oldest.

cp spammer yet the proof of this is tenuous at best. you're believing the words of an actual 'p spammer (goth) who specifically wanted to stir up drama, was doxxed BY kuz during the soot era, and continued to spam 'p on the site even while kuz was admin, plus the words of doll (scammed by kolyma, wanted to continue holding power over the site even after selling it) and froot (was very obviously obsessed with kuz throughout his entire reign, to the point where his entire persona was essentially a thinly veiled parody of kuz), both of whom had motivation to lie in this scenario.

you can acknowledge the pedo allegations on the page without saying they're 100% true. that's what I was trying to do with my edits.

the fact is, most soyteens don't even seem to believe it anymore. why should the wiki keep parroting these claims as if they're proven fact? Golem (talk) 00:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Most soyteens not caring isn't the same as not believing. If we're talking biased sources, consider kuz's huge history of lying about his identity and gaslighting. You still do not address Heyuri, you still do not address Kaguya's Kolyma email, and I'll assume you'll claim the 'p spam was solely from Goth or other miscellaneous pedophiles. I haven't even brought up Max, either—since we all know his identity was fake, do you believe that Max really was some completely different guy? At the absolute most generous, kuz associated with and enabled pedophiles, which when combined with his post history very easily makes him look like a pedophile as well.

Claiming he was too young to groom someone is also ridiculous, most child predators get started at younger ages, and sociopathy doesn't require you be above 16. --~Chud60183 (talk) 00:44, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

>You still do not address Heyuri, you still do not address Kaguya's Kolyma email

what about those things is even relevant?

heyuri is a tranime site for oldtroon LARPers, not a literal child porn distribution site. and kaguya's email... is owned by kaguya, not kuz.

we're talking about kuz spamming 'p. not about him owning a tranime site. yeah that was gay but it doesn't prove he spammed child porn.

>do you believe that Max really was some completely different guy?

no actually. probably not. I'm not saying kuz is the most innocent person ever, I'm not saying kuz never lied, I'm not saying eduardo fultz was really him, I'm not even saying he wasn't a fag or that the kuzcord leaks were fake. I'm saying that the page should be more neutral, and rather than portray him as the literal spawn of scully, it should try and portray him as accurately and unbiasedly as possible, and present both sides of the story without interjecting every 4 seconds with "but also he was a pedo doe". I'm not really a diehard kuz dickrider, I simply don't think the way he's portrayed now is very fair.

right now, the very first line of the page calls him a pedophile. right now, it sources claims from literal 'p spammers that are known to be unreliable sources. right now, there is nothing on the page that can make you understand why anyone would like kuz. the info about his actual tenure as administrator is very limited, coverage basically ends in 2022.

let me just put it at this: those who defend kuz can name about a dozen events that happened when kuz was admin, those who denounce him will just say "there was a lot of 'p spam and failtrolls and stuff and he was a pedo". the wiki page basically says the latter. this is why /soy/ is questioning the validity of any of this. the common opinion of the 'ki right now on /soy/ is that it is totally untrustworthy when it comes to topics like these, and the fact that people trying to change the first sentence from "kuz was a pedophile" to "kuz was a former administrator" is a controversial change that must immediately be reverted is exactly why.

instead of hammering it in that "HE WAS A PEDO!!!1!!" you could present the evidence in a completely unbiased manner and let people come to their own conclusions. if the allegations are true, then surely everyone will come to that conclusion based on the evidence, no?

>At the absolute most generous, kuz associated with and enabled pedophiles, which when combined with his post history very easily makes him look like a pedophile as well.

then let the page say that?

instead of definitively saying "kuz was a pedophile", have it say "kuz did many controversial things in his past that have led many to believe he is a pedophile", while also admitting that this is not 100% confirmed, and that many still defend him.

that's literally what my edit said. I said something along the lines of "while kuz was popular as admin, following dekuzification, many soyteens came to reevaluate some of kuz's previous actions, which included pedophilic posts and the operation of pedophilic websites, and future admins would make allegations against him, including unconfirmed allegations of 'p spam. despite this, many soyteens still view him in a positive light, believing these allegations to be frootist lies, while others still hold great disdain for him and believe him to be a pedophile."

I don't see how this was any different from what you just said. it's all the same information, but worded without trying to definitively call anything true or false.

>Claiming he was too young to groom someone is also ridiculous,

okay, but the "victim" was sobot. sobot was in the same age range of 16-19 iirc. the age gap would've been like 2 years or something. Golem (talk) 02:18, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

I think I can understand and agree with most of your changes, then. Like I said, I didn't think the spirit of most of the edits was bad.

Still, as for calling him a pedophile in the first line, I don't think there's much that can be said in defense of him there. While you can certainly play down the constant hammering of him being a pedophile, Mushroom's changes to "PossiblyPedo" were a big reason for all of us showing up to the page. Clarifying more about kuz's administration beyond simply calling him a pedophile over and over is definitely better for the page. --~Chud21387 (talk) 22:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

i agree with this Cobblestone (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

I still think him being a pedo in general is debatable tbh. and even then, calling him a pedo in the first line is just overkill. like the first line should say what he was actually notable for.

like, the page on doll doesn't begin with "DOLL was an ABDL fetishist", the page on froot doesn't begin with "Froot was a BMT defender", the page on soot doesn't begin with "Soot was an individual that allowed loli porn on the sharty", the page on quote doesn't begin with "Quote was a zartycuck that posted pedophilic 'zellig art", because those aren't the most notable things about them, even if those things have been alleged about them. but apparently the page on kuz placing super emphasis on the pedo allegations is just a necessity because all he ever did as admin can just be boiled down to "he was a pedophile so stfu about him" Golem (talk) 01:45, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

>I still think him being a pedo in general is debatable tbh stopped reading there Cobblestone (talk) 01:49, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

do you have period cramps rn? Golem (talk) 05:00, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Never ask a frootist what kind of shit Froot has said on discord

(they had a link to it but I can’t find the ‘toss anymore, I’ll have to ask around)

https://soybooru.com/post/view/292748 (not the ‘toss im referring to) Mushroom (talk) 23:47, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

you two make me sick Cobblestone (talk) 23:56, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

froot

6/13/2024 4:52 PM

Gore in humans, I don't mind as long as it's adults. If it's a child, then uhh, I'd rather not see it, but I'd be lying if I said I didn't laugh at that kid getting sucked by an elevator.

before this

froot

6/13/2024 4:41 PM

I don't mind DNB

But it's a registrar problem if it was for me. Post all the decapitated black babies. You want

Black or Asian, only the plague races Mushroom (talk) 23:59, 1 October 2026 (UTC)

Also it’s ironic you acknowledge the whole thing between Kuz and goth is fake but refuse to change it, it really shows the degeneracy and bias of this website Mushroom (talk) 00:01, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

I recall froot being friends with 'p spammers on discord as well. when this was discovered, he responded saying that he just accepted any friend request people sent him, had no idea who xe was, and didn't even communicate with xem. then the whole thing died down and nobody ever talked about it again.

but apparently we can't give kuz the same luxury, because he was le bad or something. Golem (talk) 02:26, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

why are we trying to paint kuz as a good person

literal pedo being glorified to avoid bias smh Melissa (talk) 08:13, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

>painting someone as a good person is like when you like like make the page less biased or something Mushroom (talk) 08:27, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

nigga said possiblypedo and thought we wouldn't notice Cobblestone (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

cmon bro mentions of him being a pedophile were removed how is this removing bias Melissa (talk) 09:34, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

bias is when you call a pedophile a pedophile Cobblestone (talk) 13:16, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

>bias is when you call a pedophile a pedophile

giga.png Golem (talk) 16:28, 3 October 2026 (UTC)

Stop trying to sanitize kuz's page to say he's "only maybe le pee dough" because he groomed your asses

1. he spammed cp on his own website
2. i found a pantyshot of a little girl on his discord when it got logged into
3. i found him grooming sobot when that got logged into
4. there's no fucking explanation for all of his former mods, including doll lying about him spamming cp
5. he was friends with cp spammers
6. he loved loli

you can edit the article as you want but if you try to whitewash this stuff i'll rape you ^^^^^^^^^^^^ Cobblestone (talk) 11:56, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

and none of that "possiblypedo" nonsense Cobblestone (talk) 11:56, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

Okay so basically I can’t edit shit because you someone sprinkled salt on your poonussy

I knew this whole thing you had planned was a lie Mushroom (talk) 12:02, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

did you ban the supreme nigger jartycuck trying to whitewash that? Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 11:59, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

i banned him from this page so he cant edit it Cobblestone (talk) 12:01, 2 October 2026 (UTC)

The only reason you niggers like him[and sometimes worship him] is because of his soysona and Kolyma LARP. without that he would have the same reception as Red — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~Chud29938 (talk • contribs) 13:39, 2 October 2026

Kuz's actual age

While looking through Kuz's old page, you will find near the bottom a Twitter link. In this Twitter profile, there is unfortunately not very much information, however there is, notably, a birthday. This birthday is the 30th of June, 1988. If this birthday is correct, then Kuz would be running the site when he was about 35 years old, as he claimed. Of course, it is perfectly possible he lied. There is only one issue with this: the account was created in 2018. Why would Kuz pretend to be born in 1988 in 2018, well before the Sharty was even created? Worse yet, the archive is from the 30th of August in 2020, also before the Sharty was created. Strangely, in mid-October, he would remove most of his account, replacing his profile, name, and hiding his birthday. Despite this, he did not delete his account, nor did he change his handle, "@Kuznets14185097". Why would he hide a fake birthday, but not his first name from his handle? Why he did any of this, we can only guess. Still, there doesn't seem to be reason to doubt the authenticity of this birthday, considering all of this.

Links:

https://archive.is/BI2ew

https://web.archive.org/web/20200830064011/https://twitter.com/kuznets14185097

https://web.archive.org/web/20201018001009/https://twitter.com/Kuznets14185097 Ligeti (talk) 20:48, 9 October 2026 (UTC)