Talk:Mineral rating system

I know the reddit post this is a reference to

'dit war

its half filled so you can distinguish which rating is shitter/better than the other. again, the list format is raisin because it doesnt have any of that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CoblonDisciple (talk • contribs)

It might be intuitive to you, but for anyone else looking at the page for the first time it might just look like a shitty half-filled list. The previous version clearly defined which rating meant what, and was overall less painful to look at. But we can do a poll on which is better. 1984Jak (talk) 05:01, 10 May 2025 (EST)

>they don't know the state of the page before gem control clitty leaked over it

should we add vantawhite and vantagrey?

i'm not really sure if i really should add it or not Eoot (talk) 18:14, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

so what now

half this page is obsolete now due to the gradingcaust removing like every rating here except the basic ones used in common soyspeak. do we just remove all the obsolete ones or keep them up for sake of archival FitchBaggot (talk) 16:58, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I've seen people use the other ratings off the wiki though North (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

whoever fucking did this kys mineral ratings were the most fun thing on this site ChudtheVILE (talk) 21:27, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Wasn't me, but I still think I should get promoted to janny for my compliance Antimatter (talk) 21:51, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

yeah i dont doubt that antimatter/brimstone/gemerald etc. will still be used but theres still alot of stuff in here only really used on the 'ki like singularity and vantawhite. i guess it could be nice to still keep them up as a novelty FitchBaggot (talk) 03:54, 15 January 2026 (UTC)