Talk:Ongezellig (detractor perspective)
From Soyjak Wiki, the free ensoyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
does anyone have the zelligpedo gangnam style parody it's on da 'tube put it where the 'zellig theme song is on the normal article GapeNewell (talk) 16:49, 17 January 2025 (EST)
- nvm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGmEaenKvX0 GapeNewell (talk) 16:57, 17 January 2025 (EST)
- should we really split this off into a perspective when the original article kind of reflected the consensus that zellig is forced and not very liked by most teens already Cobblestone (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2025 (EST)
- nvm i read the original article and it only kind of mentions that near the end cuz of how shitty and unorganized it is. Cobblestone (talk) 20:30, 17 January 2025 (EST)
Merge[edit source]
Most of the article is identical and the info here should just be on the main article, with better formatting though cause it's currently shitty. Cobblestone (talk) 02:05, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
- that article is currently "neutral" (aka zelligcuck-oriented) so merging would remove the detractor's perspective altogether Anonymous SAGE! (talk) 13:27, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- That's the point. Better have everything available in one article. Cobblestone (talk) 13:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- We should keep it TBH, the detractor page is just pure seethe while the neutral one is informative. Not all ‘teens hate ‘zellig and having another «X IS VANTABLACK BRIMSTONE» page is boring Cobsonant (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- Why not just take whatever good info in this article there is and merge it without the seethe part? Cobblestone (talk) 13:52, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- Although you are right about the article being pure seethe, merging this with the main article would cause gemmy seetheralds from zelligniggers.
- Why not just take whatever good info in this article there is and merge it without the seethe part? Cobblestone (talk) 13:52, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- We should keep it TBH, the detractor page is just pure seethe while the neutral one is informative. Not all ‘teens hate ‘zellig and having another «X IS VANTABLACK BRIMSTONE» page is boring Cobsonant (talk) 13:47, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- That's the point. Better have everything available in one article. Cobblestone (talk) 13:29, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
- Outside of my power fantasy you should make this article a TINY bit more informative & neutral while keeping the detraction and merge. For all i know merging the detractors perspective could cause nusois into hating 'zellig, therefore killing it finally.
- -Goopz 23:48, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Do not merge, it is NOT identical at all Soytanator (talk) 20:47, 15 October 2025 (UTC)
