Reintroducing the 'ki-'ru visa program. Check it out!
Use the new {{Dossier}} template for namefag pages that demands a minimum of information
Template talk:Dossier
My solution[edit source]
@Fenriris @MarketPliers a janny just decided to get rid of supreme's page because of "non-notability", when he has the most downvoted post in booru history, and after talking with them the real reason was just that they don't think someone who is notable in a negative way should be documented, i really really disagree with this as it ruins the whole point of the wiki which is to document anything notable, and you know what i said before about not messing with people's freedom to edit the wiki if what they're doing isn't against the rules (jannies trying to control narratives), so i made this meta-template as a way to enforce notability rules and quality control, basically it's a meta-template that you substitute instead of transcluding and people should fill in all the fields, it expects 3 events, their references, and all the other info that a good namefag page would need, you can make the fields required via templatedata or change its layout a little/add more fields but this is the idea, thoughts? Cobblestone (talk) 16:27, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- luckily the page got uncensored and i can finally write freely again, but this will still be useful as a notability criteria: if someone can fill in all of this then the page should be allowed, is my idea. Cobblestone (talk) 17:28, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- I see it. ll tell him to use the deletion request template. Thats why I added those clarifications to the manual of style, to avoid just that. Good idea honestly, ill see what I can do Fenriris 🐺 18:04, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- it wasn't deleted but it was redirected to the list of namefags where it had none of the details that needed to be written down, let me know what u think about this template tho Cobblestone (talk) 18:06, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, dont worry I am scolding them off over there. I 100% agree with you, but hopefully with what I said will get them to stop. They probably just did not know yet because it was added yesterday, which fair, I got this. Fenriris 🐺 18:28, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- I see nothing wrong with it, ill move it to the template space in a bit. Dealing with an email. @User:MarketPliers can add anything else that was missed. Good job Fenriris 🐺 19:25, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah, dont worry I am scolding them off over there. I 100% agree with you, but hopefully with what I said will get them to stop. They probably just did not know yet because it was added yesterday, which fair, I got this. Fenriris 🐺 18:28, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- it wasn't deleted but it was redirected to the list of namefags where it had none of the details that needed to be written down, let me know what u think about this template tho Cobblestone (talk) 18:06, 24 July 2026 (UTC)
- I see it. ll tell him to use the deletion request template. Thats why I added those clarifications to the manual of style, to avoid just that. Good idea honestly, ill see what I can do Fenriris 🐺 18:04, 24 July 2026 (UTC)