Template talk:Vantapurple

its still alive?

marge? i thought vantapurple got raped in the gradingcaust FitchBaggot (talk) 16:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

was spared the moment people pointed out that it wasn't actually a rating template. also it's the only template for weird/nonsense articles that aren't schizophrenic. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 04:16, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

oh thats cool FitchBaggot (talk) 16:45, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

The documentation is gone doe OPShredder (talk/death threats) 08:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

This template should go back to its pre-'caust form

As discussed above, vantapurple isn't really a rating so much as a disclaimer that the topic is heckin' incomprehensible or whatever. The template's current usage is redundant with Template:Topaz being a thing, and This (topic) is a vantapurple... just flows better than This page is a vantapurple.... I think we should also keep it because it's pretty unobtrusive and has funny text. -- Neptune 19:41, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

how did it look prior to the gradingcaust? Limeade (talk) 19:43, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

same as now, except with the page title instead of "this page". It's an easy change that I can do myself but I should probably clear it with the janny cabal -- Neptune 19:46, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

nah topaz fulfills that purpose as well. ngl just nuke this template and be done with it, its ugly and redundant Limeade (talk) 19:47, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Topaz is specifically for well written schizoposts though, but this template is not necessary considering {{Marge}} exists 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 04:53, 24 March 2026 (UTC)