User talk:111111

hello

I rejected your 0chan page and image because the site which you linked to has a history pedophilia and bmt.

>because the site which you linked to has a history pedophilia and bmt.

the .life is already dead you retard

>MUH DELETE 0CHAN PAGE AND HIS LOGO IMAGE FILE BECAUSE SOME RANDOM CLONE HAD FOODISTS PEDOS AND BMT

I think we should delete all sharty links because soot allowed bmt and justification of pedophilia

also kuz was a pedophile who turned the sharty into pedophile niggerhell

also froot gigaquoted a pedo

also the wiki is full of pages about pedophile sites (baraag for example), why aren't these pages deleted? Very funny that the baraag page also has the baraag link and the link or the page isn't deleted

omg why soycucks are so retarded

0chan

I'm going to reject the 0chan article because it just seems like an advertisement --Broot (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Oh I didnt even see that first discussion, yeah its not going through --Broot (talk) 10:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

rulescucked deletionist shithole

literal the SNCA: space is made for this snca, but deletionist soycucks are too leaky and they delete everything they don't like