User talk:111111

hello

I rejected your 0chan page and image because the site which you linked to has a history pedophilia and bmt.

>because the site which you linked to has a history pedophilia and bmt.

the .life is already dead you retard

>MUH DELETE 0CHAN PAGE AND HIS LOGO IMAGE FILE BECAUSE SOME RANDOM CLONE HAD FOODISTS PEDOS AND BMT

I think we should delete all sharty links because soot allowed bmt and justification of pedophilia

also kuz was a pedophile who turned the sharty into pedophile niggerhell

also froot gigaquoted a pedo

also the wiki is full of pages about pedophile sites (baraag for example), why aren't these pages deleted? Very funny that the baraag page also has the baraag link and the link or the page isn't deleted

omg why soycucks are so retarded

0chan

I'm going to reject the 0chan article because it just seems like an advertisement --Broot (talk) 10:05, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

Oh I didnt even see that first discussion, yeah its not going through --Broot (talk) 10:08, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

rulescucked deletionist shithole

literal the SNCA space is made for this snca, but deletionist soycucks are too leaky and they delete everything they don't like

How to sign on talkpages

~~~~ ----> Cobblestone (talk) 15:37, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Ok, thanks 111111 (talk) 11:06, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Swinny user?

On swinny's /soy/res/60924.html there'a thread that says "I 'jakked this caricature, this is what I got I'm also going to add background" with the image that became the December 4 Dailyjak under name "Syndicate.png". You uploaded Syndicate.png and added a licensing that says "This file was uploaded by the photographer or author". So you are the OP of that swinny thread? --Gembaker (talk) 01:49, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Saw this. He seems to be in the clear. Thanks for reporting Fenriris 🐺 02:12, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

He's probably a swinnychunk but who cares about something as little as this. Cobblestone (talk) 05:13, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

After analyzing some contributions and doing some background checking I also came to the conclusion that xe's definitely also an 0cuck. Wholesome bonzicuck (talk) 06:40, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

hello dobkun

I'm not an ochkopizduk 0cuck, I just know russian language 111111 (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

>ochkopizduk

You just exposed yourself, nobody fucking knows this term outside of the slavnigger inner circle

Also I have compared some posting dates between the already-mentioned websites and they are too similar to be a coincidence Wholesome bonzicuck (talk) 18:55, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

"ochkopizduk" is a slur for 0cucks

>Also I have compared some posting dates between the already-mentioned websites and they are too similar to be a coincidence

yes, but I just wanted to make a SNCA page about 0cuck due to being a new boogieman

Yes it is a slur but nobody uses it except for the site itself and some communities orbiting it. Wholesome bonzicuck (talk) 19:25, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Yes, and it means that I'm not a 0cuck because it's a slur for 0cucks

I can't post on the sharty so I made a thread on the swinny

So if you gonna ban me ban mustard too because he uses the swinny 111111 (talk) 18:17, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Oh swinnychunks! Cobblestone (talk) 20:56, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Making this clear o algo

I had to jump in with what info I know, then you started whining Wholesome bonzicuck (talk) 20:44, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Also this message will be the end of my autistic obsession with you because you are snca Wholesome bonzicuck (talk) 20:47, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Yes, I'm SNCA 111111 (talk) 20:49, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Marge who is this hacker known as 0cuck