User talk:~Chud6170

your edit on jakparty.soy

Don't even reference it at all. North (talk) 06:33, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

>retard who is calling random shit le fuggen pee is giving attention to failtrolls
No surprise here. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 15:41, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

>SAAR HE IS HECKING GIVING TO ATTENTION TO FAILTROLLS YADA BIR KUCHH ALGO

My edit did not mention that site. All it had was the fact that the Jarty lives on in a pedophilic splinter. Stop dickriding jannies. ~Chud6170 (talk) 16:09, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

And what is that? That's mentioning it indirectly dumbass. This is still feeding them attention. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 16:20, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

The information I tried to add within my edit to that page was so impossibly vague, no one that didn't already know about that site could have even understood what I was referencing. ~Chud6170 (talk) 16:50, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Well you're not supposed to mention it at all. North (talk) 16:55, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Why reference it at all? You're just making them look "cool" by subtly alluding to the existence their heccin evil site. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 16:56, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

The only people who think allusions to pedophilic groups make them sound "cool" are the same degenerates who would post Jeffrey Epstein and Peter Scully edits. Oh, wait, that's you. My bad. Now, I understand. You're just projecting. ~Chud6170 (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Do quotation marks mean nothing to you retard? I did not literally call it cool, I implied they would view it as such. Get some reading comprehension. And stop seething at namefag drama lmao. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 17:22, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Stop calling random shit CP

Special:PermaLink/365152

You undid a revision under the false pretext of it containing "cp", therefore I will revert it. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 15:40, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

>Inflation porn of babies is not CP

Go back to gooning to Soytan rape porn, nigger ~Chud6170 (talk) 15:59, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Okay, let's ignore the fact that it's clearly a grown man wearing a binky dancing. If it was ACTUALLY CP, you'd be a fucking retard for just reverting the change instead of reporting it lmao. So you're stupid no matter what. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 16:18, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

There is no point in reporting it, because the entire Janny Cabal, with the backing of real life HTSMs like you, believes that, somehow, a pornographic depiction of a character— historically used to depict real babies— is not pedophilic in nature. Therefore, they will simply reject the report and go back to gooning with their 'cord xisters. The best I can do is edit war and hope that my edits are approved by jannies not completely kiked out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~Chud6170 (talk • contribs)

So you're willingly using a site that you believe to literally be openly hosting "CP"? This doesn't sound good on your part lmao. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 16:34, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

It's incredibly obvious to anyone not blind that practically everyone on the Soysphere agrees with me on this being pedophilic. If the 'ki, 'ru, and the 'arty were filled with pedophiles, yes, I would not be using it. I use these sites, however, because I simply hope the jannies listen to the userbase and come to their senses, banning these depictions of babyjak like they banned soylita. ~Chud6170 (talk) 16:39, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Would you keep using the site if a new administration hypothetically let actual l*li porn stay up since you're claiming it's basically the same as a fat guy wearing a binky dancing? lol. You're basically saying "it's okay as long as the users disagree". I'll tell you I'd leave the site immediately if that happened. Not a good look for you... BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 16:49, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

I am sure you use mainstream websites like Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, and Instagram. These websites all share a rampant problem of sexualized depictions of minors. On Twitter, you can easily find lolicon, hidden behind an NSFW disclaimer. Reddit, YouTube, and Instagram may take months to remove content with child porn embedded within it. You could say the administration of each of these sites lets child porn stay on their platform. Many of the users of these websites know about these issues, yet continue using them. Are they pedophiles? Have you stopped using these sites completely? ~Chud6170 (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Nope, I do not use any social media but this doesn't really matter because your comparison is flawed. You're comparing gigantic social media websites that don't really have tight control over the content in them (due to sheer size) to a small site like this one. So let me make my question to you more clear: would you use a small site (like this one) that allowed actual l*li porn to stay up if it's users didn't agree with it? If you answer no, then something tells me that you're being hypocritical and you don't really believe that the babyjak stuff is "cp" and you're just making excuses to try and get rid of something which you don't like. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 17:15, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Waiting for your answer :) BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 17:33, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Big or small, I'm sure it's easy to respond to reports on pedophilic content, especially when you have 1488 pajeets, that do it for free, working around the clock processing them. ~Chud6170 (talk) 14:06, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

FYI "babyjak" was always meant to be a gross, fat and wrinkly age regressor but somewhere along the way underage soytroons decided to use it to self insert for some reason. Supreme was one of the oldfags making babyjak edits back then. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 16:53, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Oh, yes, I'm sure you're the oldest oldfag in the entire Soysphere. Oh, wait, you joined late 2025. So don't niggerbabble about how "IT'S HECKING OLDFAG KULCHUR SAAR". You weren't around back then. You can't speak about what babyjak was once meant to be, and neither can I. What matters is how most soyteens perceive babyjak now. The use of Template:Angrycaca on the Age regression page to show disgust for the idea of it demonstrates that soyteens tend to perceive babyjak as a genuine baby, not an age regressing 30-year-old sperg, despite what the beard might suggest. In most soyteens' eyes, therefore, the sexualized depictions of babyjak qualify as 'p. ~Chud6170 (talk) 17:03, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Answer my question on the other comment btw

>The use of Template:Angrycaca on the Age regression page to show disgust for the idea of it demonstrates that soyteens tend to perceive babyjak as a genuine baby

AKA

>my underage autistic wiki circlejerk agrees with me!!

how is this a valid argument lol

>Oh, yes, I'm sure you're the oldest oldfag in the entire Soysphere.

i was not speaking from my own experience retard this is what people like mustard and supreme said. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 17:08, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

>how is this a valid argument

If it was just a "wiki circlejerk", I'm sure some chudGOD would have removed it. ChudGODS often try to remove things they disagree with.

Anyway, I love how you didn't address my point about how babyjak is still a real baby in most soyteens' eyes. ~Chud6170 (talk) 17:12, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Because they're retarded. Obviously this isn't a fucking baby. BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 17:17, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

stfu

nobaldi cares about user:soyak stop edit warring on her userpage already nigger-- 我们之中 16:11, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Starting like 5 edit wars without even creating an account

y doe— Preceding unsigned comment added by Neptune (talk • contribs)

he needs to delete da jerdee 'p to btfo da pee dough jannies BlackKING88 (talk / contribs) 17:51, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

>smearing around a fat babyjak gif to own the heckin' nusois ev&oe im one myself IT'S TOO GILLKOYIMPILLED Mushroot (talk) 18:13, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Log in tranonymous sage

>mfw ban evader gets revealed

Cobblepoon can attest to me not being Tranonymous Sage. ~Chud6170 (talk) 03:57, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Log in XC

Marge, who's XC? ~Chud6170 (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

You don't know? North (talk) 12:41, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Literal who booru namefag of the week or something. ~Chud6170 (talk) 12:45, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

no urls

no urls

oh wait nvm it´s a really old splinter-- 我们之中 16:48, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

on {{Inactive}}

You don't have to add it manually we have a bot to do that automatically after a certain time has passed. 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 17:17, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

I think it's not working properly, because some of these users have not contributed since 2022 or 2021, but {{inactive}} was never added to their user pages. ~Chud6170 (talk) 17:18, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeah checked and it's not one of it's currently documented tasks, must've been disabled for some reason. You can carry on if you want. 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 17:23, 27 March 2026 (UTC)