Soyjak Wiki talk:Template question/3

marge

Are we really doing this again? 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 01:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

We probably shouldn’t, there was already a template question this year, and this time it’s because of one guy rather than several people. I think that this is unnecessary. Especially since he’s the only guy who edited its page for the most part. Vantared | SNCA page 12:11, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

I feel like some templates are redundant or better off merging and this would probably be easier than sticking a bunch of delete/mergeto templates on them individually and seeing what actions get taken. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 02:18, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

North dislikes this.

Vantared dislikes this.

oh my heckerinos

WAOW! another pointless gradingcaust that will DEFINITELY NOT cause a bunch of shitflinging soy was taken 14:57, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

TSMT Vantared | SNCA page 12:10, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

gradingcausts are aryan shemmycuck GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 13:24, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

bro thinks hes on the team

yeah sure why not just larp as a moderator and try to delete like 20 templates that you personally don't like... NO FUN ALLOWED HERE ON SOYJAK WIKI! -- Neptune 19:39, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

I agree. If this obsessed faggot causes another unnecessary purge just because he doesn’t like some shit, then he should just quit. I fucking hate him because he always ruins everything fun. Vantared | SNCA page 12:09, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

>larping as a moderator and trying to delete like 20 templates that you personally don't like

>>larping as a moderator and trying to delete like 20 templates that you personally don't like

the purpose of this template question

I don't see many templates getting archived/deleted from this aside from the ones that were only used on one or two pages. I suggest we keep this page as an index of what the current perception of each template is, i.e. what needs improving instead of what needs to be culled. 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 19:43, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

>what needs improving instead of what needs to be culled

That's the purpose of the coal tier being split into two - one tier for bad but fixable templates that need improvement, and the other for bad/useless templates that aren't fixable and could be culled. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 08:10, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

And yet you’re just adding shit you don’t like to “coal” even if they’re good. Vantared | SNCA page 12:12, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Just because it's aesthetically passable doesn't mean the template needs to exist. Most of the templates in the coal tier are in there because their usecase is pointless (too common or not frequent enough to warrant a template)

No it’s not. And if they’re too common, get rid of instances where they aren’t needed instead of just nuking them like a retard.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vantared (talk • contribs) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vantared (talk • contribs)

Having a widespread usecase isn't a deletion worthy thing if the template has redeeming qualities. Everything in the coal tier is there because they have multiple problems in addition to usecase issues, and no obvious ways to fix them that don't involve entirely remaking them or just making a variant of another template. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 13:00, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

The only problem they have is that YOU don’t like them. And I guess everything you don’t like is automatically bad.

Everything I don't like is automatically bad

again, just attacking GauntletThrown instead of addressing the issues at hand. Provide actual arguments for each template instead of just going >WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH THEY'RE TRYING TO REMOVE MY FAVORITE TEMPLATE ON THE SOYWIKI NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO KYSKYSKYSKYSKYS 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 13:41, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

gauntlet could just fix the said problems himself, i don't understand why another templatecaust is needed. TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 13:45, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Only the sloppiest slop will be trimmed, the rest will have their issues fixed. 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 13:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

i already hate the gradingcaust cause they removed my favourite template, also, templates shouldn't be removed without an actual valid reason. TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

if only the template question pages all included table columns for reasonings behind a template's placement GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 14:03, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

About GauntletThrown

I’m extremely worried. He’s trying to get rid of everything he doesn’t like regardless of whether or not it’s actually good or bad. This kind of obsession will inevitably cause endless amounts of shitflinging that I’d like to avoid, but I’m also frustrated so I don’t see anything good coming from this. I think that there shouldn’t be another template question just because of one mediator being a template hater. Vantared | SNCA page 12:18, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

pointless nigger war above me, constantly being in snca drama develops 'jakking fatigue, move on. TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Ad hominem. These templates have flaws and indexing which ones need to be improved is a good thing. 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 12:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Nobody else gives a shit. Vantared | SNCA page 12:33, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

You vandalized the fukcing project page with zero provocation, got it reverted by another editor, and then spent allat time yapping about how I am literally admin 6 and the most obsessed brimstone to ever grace the soysphere. All because I dared to not disagree with cobblestone nuking the grading templates (which I wasn't a fan of in the first place because they were almost all reskin bloat anywayz). If anyone's obsessed, it's you for trying to turn a wiki maintenance project's talkpage into a soapbox against your personal boogeyman GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 12:41, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

It’s not vandalism, it’s trying to stop you from causing a useless nigger war that nobody other than you and one^{[it just is, ok?]} other retard support.

Fuck you— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vantared (talk • contribs)

No rebuttal geg 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 12:52, 25 May 2026 (UTC)