Template talk:Failtroll

thread number 11757450

https://megalodon.jp/2025-0620-0539-52/https://www.soyjak.st:443/soy/thread/11757450.html

▶ Dr. Soyberg 06/19/25 (Thu) 22:17:07 /soy/ No.11757450

can we remove or change the "failtroll" template/section on the wiki to remove the UTTP/f00dist sh1t or reduce them to a footnote? most people on here literally only know them because of the wiki (i wouldn't be surprised if was f00dists who wrote the pages themselves)

they thrive of attention. they barely even raid here yet every nusoi thinks they're the world's biggest threat and not just a bunch of third world LARPing edgelords with a 'p collection.

>inb4 "we have to know about them!!!"

then keep it on /raid/ and to doxing them. do you think it makes them seethe when you leak over them? no, they find it hilarious. they love attention and you guys give them it in spades. I know you guys are huge newfaggots but we've always been the target of 'cords and raisin. just because you joined in november 2024 or something doesn't mean people weren't always doing this crap, like the @ft3rp@rty or q@f3 (i don't know if they're still wordfiltered or not)

i see nusoyim unironically traumatized over this crap and with their guard up 24/7, accusing everyone of being a f00dist or whatever and it gives me second hand embarrassment. it's like seeing a kid on the playground start seething at their bully, thinking they're "showing them what for" when in reality they're giving them exactly what they want.

Response

In actual fact, we could just replace all instances of this template with the 'cord template. Cobblestone (talk) 14:42, 19 June 2025 (EST)

what about making the template a footer? CoblonDisciple (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2025 (EST)

only navboxes are footers so it wouldnt make sense Cobblestone (talk) 14:53, 19 June 2025 (EST)

are those not the same thing? if not then i meant to say navboxes CoblonDisciple (talk) 14:54, 19 June 2025 (EST)

it would become a hall of fame for pedophiles to try to get into. an entire navbox of lesotho's best rapists sounds even worse. Cobblestone (talk) 15:37, 19 June 2025 (EST)

as for condensing foodists/failtrolls into one thing like the original thread says. before that i once tried to merge uttp into "foodists" and have them all be 1 thing but people said no to that (check the talkpage). maybe now we should do it though. i'll ask for sproke's judgement Cobblestone (talk) 15:42, 19 June 2025 (EST)

Response

The articles in their current state isn't an issue. Any "Nusois" that have read these articles are interested in them enough to binge read them. They get what they put in, and that's info about these failtrolls. They'll still talk about them even after any changes. The articles might not even be the issue, since there's other websites that contain similar info. The only problem is if there's too many of these articles. I think the current number is okay right now.

There is some overlapping usecase between Template:Failtroll and Template:Discord. They might distinct enough to coexist: Trolls vs 'corders. It's recommended to check some of the pages from each category before making a decision. SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 16:41, 19 June 2025 (EST)

sounds reasonable. thanks for the response. Cobblestone (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2025 (EST)

I think it should be failtrolls who don't want this sort of attention and if they do only put them on the 'ki if it is their full conformed dox and other info they don't want public in the dox dump page, not just seethe.. Also not just a whole page about literal who underage 'cord foodist No 14008841 and how le terrible and scary he is. I think we are fine right now. OopooPoopoo (talk) 15:45, 24 June 2025 (EST)