User talk:Broot/Broot (Brootist perspective)

>supporter perspectives are now a thing --Username entered already in use (talk) 18:29, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

This is arguably a good thing since nueditors can keep transhearting their favorite aspie admin whilst the main article stays (mostly) le nootral. 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 18:33, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

>aspie talk about throwing stones from glass houses North (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Keep

His currently page has negative things like his demotions and controversy's so should stayIronEcho (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

delete

it's dusty and only he wants it to stay geg, the other admin supporter perspective pages are unnecessary too G-Man (talk) 18:55, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Ok and if you end up deleting it will be restored like the other 8 gorillion times it got deleted (for no reason). --Carrot (talk) 18:56, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Lets get the publics opinion on this. Take into consideration broot's socks. Tar (talk) 18:57, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Blocked him from this page for this reason and due to him breaking rule G9.2. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 19:00, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Should Broot (Brootist perspective) be kept or deleted?

You are not entitled to vote.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.

Kept

Delete

There were 14 votes since the poll was created on 18:57, 7 July 2026.

poll-id B7B87593356C8006AEC5A810D5EB799E

it's objectively a low-quality stub about a guy who isn't even admin anymore. Maybe move it to Broot/Brootist perspective o algo if you're that set on not deleting it. -- Neptune (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

My fucking sides kek. Thats six to one as of writing. Tar (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

inb4 it gets botted AwardedAccountAward (talk) 19:02, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

I'll laugh my ass off if he's pathetic enough to do this.〜 MarketPliers (talk) 19:03, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Nigga be real, nophono is botting a soyjack wiki poll bruh --Carrot (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

I proudly casted my voteIronEcho (talk) 19:04, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

>stub

Not a stub, has a decent amount of sentences.

>low quality

subjective, and even then it can be improved upon rather than deleting the page.

>not even an admin anymore

not a proper deletion reason? should we delete anything related to previous admins as well? --Carrot (talk) 19:05, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

It has 4 real sentences. It is objectively low quality and biased due to you writing it. No one is interested in improving it because no one wants to glaze you. This page has only been allowed to stay due to you being admin in the past. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 19:08, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Chud2730 wrote it dummy, and you havent stated an actual good reason to warrant its deletion aside from bias --Carrot (talk) 19:11, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Broot log in. Tar (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Not an argument --Carrot (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

It's a temp account with only one contribution it's so obviously you Broot 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 19:13, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Even if it was, would that be a valid deletion reason? --Carrot (talk) 19:14, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Yeah youre not supposed to write articles sucking yourself off. Tar (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

New soyjak wiki hidden rule unlocked --Carrot (talk) 19:16, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

I am out of the kindness of my own heart entertaining this debate because you know its going to be restored if it ends up getting deleted. --Carrot (talk) 19:12, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Yeah because you're gonna spam email quote about this like you've done 2 times in the past already. You do not care about the quality or health of the wiki, you just want to be remembered as something you aren't. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 19:15, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Subjective and opinionpilled --Carrot (talk) 19:16, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

I'm not sure this is broot because I am pretty sure he is allergic to carrotsIronEcho (talk) 19:16, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Its obviouspilled. Tar (talk) 19:17, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

does this related to the post being deleted or what? this is a talk page not a forum. --Carrot (talk) 19:19, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

broot is trying so hard to be gem control kek AwardedAccountAward (talk) 19:16, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Holy reach, gem control was known for clittydeleting shit for no reason, which is what you guys are trying to do, so maybe you want to be nugem control? --Carrot (talk) 19:19, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

don't you clittyban people over editing your stuff? holy damage control AwardedAccountAward (talk) 19:22, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Maybe broot is nugem control. Oh wait- Tar (talk) 19:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

I do not think that is BrootIronEcho (talk) 19:18, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Eh whatever, when my second cousin once removed (broot) gets his bureaucrat again this page will be restored if it ends up getting clittydeleted so have fun yall. --Carrot (talk) 19:23, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Rules for thee but not for me 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

nigga you're the one who wants a page deleted because you dont like it bruh --Carrot (talk) 19:26, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Rules for me but not for thee Tar (talk) 19:26, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

>wanting a page deleted because you don't like it

GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 20:13, 7 July 2026 (UTC)