Namefag talk:TheCatalan1977

LITERAL WHO IN THE HOUSE Filobab (talk) 17:03, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

The spirit of the wiki dies when you can't make funny pages on literal whos anymore. --~Chud21633 (talk) 17:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Im not that relevant son also gegbulls like me go to the Namefag page TheCatalan1977 (talk) 17:06, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

the namefag space doesnt exist though Filobab (talk) 17:08, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

yep @Fenriris said no namefag namespace unfortunately Cobblestone (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

I feel like he is relevent enough though, theres just the edit warring with it Fenriris 🐺 23:26, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

>>https://soybooru.com/ Perpetualchange (Talk) (About me • Song recommendations) 17:10, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Merged article into Namefag article

You can delete it, but...

It was gemmy ngl, I kneel you chud TheCatalan1977 (talk) 17:08, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

this page is awesome

stop eradicating all the namefag pages to larp as a based anti namefag soyteen chud Cobblestone (talk) 21:03, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

cobblestone please stop trying to larp as a anti-janny censorship activist AwardedAccountAward (talk) 21:34, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

can u fuck off? ur always following me trying to revert anything i do, just go away Cobblestone (talk) 21:41, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

stop attentionwhoring then AwardedAccountAward (talk) 21:47, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

who the hell is this guy

marge

Just read the article, geg Fenriris 🐺 21:30, 29 July 2026 (UTC)

nophono

unlock the page and reconsider his notability here. –Gem 💎 (talk) 16:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC) 16:22, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

come on, the page is fairly well-written Cobblestone (talk) 16:23, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

didn't say otherwise, but people want to expand it. –Gem 💎 (talk) 16:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC) 16:24, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

i wish we could be more receptive to nophono namefags in general, you SHOULD be able to write about any topic you want on the wiki, which is why i made the snca namespace, the problem is you can't put namefags in there because they're sharty related but you also can't write a SNCA namefag in the mainspace without busybody jannies trying to delete it, you also have to make it high-quality from the start which goes against the point of a wiki where someone starts off a shitty article and everyone expands it over time, oh well, maybe @Fenriris will rethink his mind on the namefag namespace one day. Cobblestone (talk) 16:32, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

albeit namefags don't deserve pages unless they've done something notable, which is like 99% of the time never lmao besides you don't want 1000 attentionwhores trying to get a page on themselves the wiki don't you Contributor (talk) 16:53, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

that's why you'd put it in its own namespace, to signal that it's SNCA. the notable namefags would get moved out to the mainspace. you are allowed to write about snca namefags as a subpage on your userpage currently, same thing Cobblestone (talk) 16:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Regardless of his notability, nobaldi can edit this page right now. –Gem 💎 (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC) 17:08, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

@Gzard @G-Man janny tranny wake up unlock this shit right now Cobblestone (talk) 17:10, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

Done. G-Man (talk) 18:26, 31 July 2026 (UTC)

That's not what this is. I believe anyone who spends hours crafting an article such as this is worthy of having their article kept up as intended. This isn't a low effort "here's generic namefag 238219 and why he's the fuggen jerdee," it's a genuinely humorous and informative article backed up by well sourced citations. Pretty textbook of a 'ki article if you ask me.Dove (talk) 04:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Vandalism

I admit, its amusing, but don't vandalize the redirect. Niggerhell edit war Rickert (talk) 04:00, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

I apologize if I accidentally messed up the redirect. I was trying to do things the right way, a page on a namefag should redirect to the page written on them rather than their hand-crafted self-congratulatory userpage.Dove (talk) 04:19, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Don't get me wrong, I agree the previous redirect is a terrible idea (I hadn't noticed when I reverted to it), but this is also a troll & is just gonna cause an edit war. See my recommendation on what to do instead below if you wanna shit on him. I guess some neutral page can be loaded (if it exists or if someone wants to make it) and this can be put up as an detractor version instead? doe the user in question isn't really that noteworthy for that. Rickert (talk) 04:30, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Marked for deletion?

This is a very well written and well sourced 'ki page. There are hundreds of examples of lesser SNCA having articles, there's no reason to delete this. Needless to say, having this fag's username redirect to his autistic little self-glazing userpage is far worse than having it redirect to a genuinely well written article like this. Removing well crafted articles like this is completely antithetical to the purpose of this wiki and it seems like anybody with a different posting persuasion than the mods here gets their articles tampered with for no reason. Please appreciate the work Funnybenny18 put into writing this article, it's far beyond the standards of this wiki. Thank you Dove (talk) 04:17, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Page is just an edit of a previous version and obvious troll, it'd be fine if Funnybenny18 left it in his userpage as he can do as he wishes there, but there's no need for this page, especially in this state, log shows a lot of edit warring already. Redirect can be changed to List_of_Soyjak_Wiki_namefags#Regular_users or be deleted altogether. You can edit his section in List_of_Soyjak_Wiki_namefags#Regular_users instead. Rickert (talk) 04:25, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

What's "troll" about it? It's a more objective article than having the page redirect to this sperg's self-sucking userpage, do you disagree? You can say there's no "use" for 99% of the pages on this wiki, that seems to be a subjective call left up to whichever 'ki joon is currently at their keyboard. I don't mean to be rude but I simply don't understand the mindset of 'ki moderation, it seems so selective. I can't just delete shit on the 'ru because it's "useless" and I fail to understand how 'ki joons get to be the high and mighty arbiters of what is or isn't SNCA. I hate to see the creativity and artistry of users stifled by retarded rules like this and I would appreciate a better explanation or a potential reconsideration on your part. Thanks Dove (talk) 04:31, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

It's a well written article to be fair, if we delete this then we'd have to delete Olgol and Trevor Turrican (talk) 04:38, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Those pages were not made elaborately as a troll, but that was just my initial impression from what I saw in the recent changes page. I apologize if it wasn't, although the page is too heavily opinionated and I'm not sure if the comparison as a gegbull is appropriate, but anyways, I explained myself enough just below. Rickert (talk) 04:53, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

For namefag pages, if they're noteworthy enough they get a page and different versions since nophono can agree on anything in the 'ki. Different perspective pages are bad imo but that's beside this topic. Once Catalan or someone else notices this and cares enough to leak they're gonna revert it immediately as well, till mods JSID the page. Anyways, if the usual namefag page case is gonna apply here, then this page should be written by someone else as neutrally as possible (certainly not Catalan or anyone who will glaze him) and this current version of the page can be a detractor perspective, since that's what happens every time, see other notable namefags pages for that. If you think Catalan is a noteworthy person, then we should revert the page to a normal page and move this current version to a detractor perspective. I am going to assume you don't, and neither do I, hence the delete request for "standalone". If you are going to argue this is the "neutral" version since Catalan is a nigger or a algx, then you'll have to deal with him and others who will come around soon to rape the page. Also, I'm not part of the staff, nor do you have to listen to me, these are just my personal thoughts and is not representative of the 'ki. I'll remove my deletion request in good faith. Rickert (talk) 04:46, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

I agree with Turrican though, after all namefag pages are still allowed. And if it is SNCA of course it can just be moved to that namespace instead. Dont really get all the hate with it. Its a good article Fenriris 🐺 06:39, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

but you cant put sharty related stuff in SNCA, admin fail ~Chud58906 (talk) 09:51, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

@User:Turrican if anybody tries to change it into an worthless redirect dont hesitate to protect the page, cause I agree at that point it should just be deleted Fenriris 🐺 06:42, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Page is an edit of a previous version that resulted in an edit war, check its history. I thought it was being revived in a troll/vandalism attempt mainly cause of how it was handled, but I was wrong. In any event, I've clarified the situation above. Apologies to all involved. Rickert (talk) 06:58, 3 August 2026 (UTC)

Rickert stop

Keep the page on him. It's large enough for a separate article Gzard (talk) 07:07, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

90% of the content is inflated literal snca doe Rickert (talk) 07:08, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

unnecessary page

something something nophono cares fan about, we've been nuking pages on unnotable users from the booru, this one should be next, this is not a notable user in any way Rickert (talk) 07:07, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Good news, there are pages where you can redirect to all your heart's content after this vote passes. Go ahead and get started on wiping all your pick of SNCA namefags while we wait for the poll to finish

https://soyjakwiki.org/Category:Pages_about_SoyBooru_users

https://soyjakwiki.org/Category:Pages_about_Soyjak_Wiki_users --Funnybenny18 | Fuck you Wikisluts (Complain about my legible writing) 07:22, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

need it or keep it

Need it or keep it

You are not entitled to vote.
You are not entitled to view results of this poll.

See results

Redirect the page

Keep the page

There were 23 votes since the poll was created on 07:10, 4 September 2026.

poll-id AD3FE98E8CCC33F05787312F0E6E3092

Gzard (talk) 07:10, 4 September 2026 (UTC)

Where's the move to SNCA namespace option? Soyteen (talk) 17:11, 5 September 2026 (UTC)

The SNCA namespace is not supposed to be used for namefags. Anyway, the votes are in, it's 11 to 6. We should definitely turn this into a redirect. Nut (talk) 22:34, 6 September 2026 (UTC)

She?

Is Catalan a female? I always thought he was a guy. Bushy (talk) 01:29, 4 October 2026 (UTC)

Gzard (talk) 03:23, 4 October 2026 (UTC)