Talk:Failtroll

Proposal: Delete or merge some of the failtroll articles

With the deletion of the failtroll template, I decided to put some of the failtroll articles on the chopping block. Think about it, these people are attention whores and our policy should be to avoid giving them attention, which is the Frootist/Quotist policy as "foodist" and "bu5t" are flagged as spam on the sharty. We have some articles about these niggers at shouldn't exist, here's my reasoning for deleting them or merging them into other articles:

• Foodistzen - Think about it, this person is the founder of the foodists, who have their own article. Why do we need a separate article for the founder of an attention whore group?
• Larpercore - A large portion of these groups are failtrolls. Just delete it or redirect it to failtroll.
• rivenrayne - Basically no sharty connection and is almost entirely about 764, which is banned from having an article on the 'ki.
• Rivernook - Literally who? Apart from being the former main contributor to the /raid/ clip thread and trying to vandalize xis article to be in favor of xim and xis grooming group after xe was banned for being a pedophile, nobody cares about xim.
• Soyjak Attacker Video Fandom - Is completely related to a school shooting organized by a 'cord grooming group which is banned from having an article on the 'ki.
• Trebson - Does an irrelevant sharty mod who later became a 'cordnigger need an article?

Articles that I argue should be kept are:

• bu5t - Infamous on the sharty, and has at least some connection to the Soysphere.
• Foodist - sharty boogeyman
• goth - Creator of that infamous video, probably has connections to Carter.
• QAfe - sharty relevant
• Skibidi Farms - same reason as Foodist
• SpateHicks - Former sharty namefag who caused a huge scandal on the sharty once xis personal army turned against xim, resulting in xim being outed as a foodist and being perma'd from the Soysphere and doxed.
• UTTP - same reason as Foodist

GapeNewell (talk) 10:20, 27 June 2025 (EST)

My SNCA opinions

• Foodistzen - Agree, merge into Foodists and add him as a section
• Larpercore - SNCA so agree
• rivenrayne - Tsmt delete it
• Rivernook - Neutral, not sure
• Soyjak Attacker Video Fandom - Idk, it seems like an ironic article to me.
• Trebson - He was a sharty mod so i think it should be kept

Cobsonant (talk) 10:28, 27 June 2025 (EST)

Ok I redirected Larpercore and Foodistzen we don't need a whole article for them OopooPoopoo (talk) 19:08, 28 June 2025 (EST)

rivenrayne's article has been deleted. GapeNewell (talk) 14:31, 30 June 2025 (EST)

Sounds good. Rivernook is also kind of SNCA but the IP info and other info on him might be useful. I'd say archive it then delete it with the archive as the message. Cobblestone (talk) 15:48, 4 July 2025 (EST)

Or just redirect. Cobblestone (talk) 16:02, 4 July 2025 (EST)

I have decided to keep Rivernook and Soyjak Attacker Video Fandom, as the deletion discussion died down. GapeNewell (talk) 18:59, 19 July 2025 (EST)

was it better split off?

this page lags my browser when i click (diff) GapeNewell (talk) 02:15, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

feel free to either split it back up again or rewrite this article to remove snca and make it more concise and thus less laggy Cobblestone (talk) 03:10, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

Just trimmed it a little, maybe it's better now. Cobblestone (talk) 03:16, 29 August 2025 (UTC)

How the hell is 09A and atomwaffen failtrolls?

These are not even at all like 764/uttp which meet the requirement to be failtrolls, they're le bad I will agree but I don't think these groups even count as failtrolls. ~Chud7655 (talk) 04:01, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

This page is still heavy

This page is heavy and lags my device. I have an idea- should we split off some of the most notorious failtroll groups and keep others here? Or maybe separate individuals? Just a suggestion. Vantared (talk) 18:10, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Blank out the archive links on the NoLimitsPedia report copypasta

Yeah let's just link working archives to a 'p endorsement site Metalgearsoywalker (talk) 03:43, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Isn't the site dead though? Cobblestone (talk) 03:46, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Yeah but you can still click through the site using the archives there has to be at least one archived article with some depraved shit Metalgearsoywalker (talk) 03:57, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Remove some sections

The encyclopedia dramatica section is unnecessary because it's pretty short and they have their whole article

Same thing with the trollcow section, it's too short and xhe isn't sharty related

G-Man (talk) 22:46, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Also I think the article should be unlocked now, and add a tip saying to not add more failtroll groups to not turn it into a list of hostile communities which are banned. G-Man (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

i think it's perfect the way it is now, it prevents people from making more snca changes --Silohpso (talk) 04:46, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

i require context

what the fuck is that video of the UTTP chimpout Sinosteak (talk) 04:14, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

i don't know Gzard (talk) 04:21, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Infiltration tactics (and how to identify them)

I think the article should note failtrolls' use of "forced" lolcows, those being people who don't actually do anything gegbvll-worthy, instead they're usually people failtrolls have a hateboner for. Examples: Paul Morris, Oscar Stern, BxBullet, Sprate Header. You can normally tell when a new splinter/faction is failtroll-adjacent because those names will be littered all over the place, either as meme edits or being framed as their "leader".

Also Wayne Lambright, who was actually a minor gegbvll on 4cuck over a decade ago, failtroll groups became obsessed with him in the 2020s for some reason. ~Chud35981 (talk) 02:43, 16 July 2026 (UTC)

add the kosher tenplate Elisa (talk) 08:28, 19 July 2026 (UTC)

Split some of these entries into their own articles again

It’s more convenient for people to read about some of them in their own separate articles and there will be less lag on this page too. Failtroll groups like UTTP should get their own pages again, but individuals who are failtrolls should stay on this page or be included in those pages.

I don't think failtroll groups should have their own pages since we want to minimize the amount of attention we give them. I say we split the lists into Failtrolls/List of groups and Failtrolls/List of individuals. That would make the article less heavy while not giving failtrolls too much attention. Soyfield (Talk Page • Contributions • Email) 05:48, 27 July 2026 (UTC)

Splits

@G-Man and others, I've put up the split template from 6.1 > 6.4 (once someone gives green light, I'll begin splitting them in that order). Should individuals listed under section 7 also be split? Rickert (talk) 02:40, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Properly splitting the article

The Failtrolls article should be better off dedicated to individuals, under (mainly those who have any relevance to the soysphere at all, such as SpateHicks or bu5t), alongside general information, speech patters, etc. TWO entirely new articles should made for groups, and for websites: Failtroll websites for SF, NLP and any other niggerhell that might get discovered and Failtroll groups for Foodists, UTTP with a possible return for the TriHard article. This should make it faster to load. ~Chud28553 (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

This, if we're already documenting them we might as well do it in a somewhat neater and performance lighter way. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 17:31, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

I think UTTP and every type of failltroll should be turned into is own arcticle

UTTP, Foodist and etc, should have its own arcticles

we don't give attwhores what they want the most Rindon (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2026 (UTC)

They don't spam 'p for attention, they are doing their shit because they are pedophiles (sometimes also zoophiles).