CURRENT MISSION: Conclude the 2026 soyjak.party hack page, aswell as any pages relating to it, such as the Summer 2026 Crisis page.
Update Quotecord with any relevant info. See the blackboard for more info.
Talk:Seventh Soysurgency: Difference between revisions
Funnybenny18 (talk | contribs) We are the soldiers of the SDF, the 'ki's most formal army! And we have discovered a solution to, A recent changes quandary: The hunky page; when the hunkies unsupervised; Made hunk-eralds; what do you do? Let the vandalists go? Well we say NO: Hunky pages are expendable; Caused by hunking-out: So we propose to go and... Move the spiels, we should move the spiels; The hunky spiels! Well they ain't coherent so it's really okay to, Move the spiels, we should move the spiels; The hun |
|||
| Line 219: | Line 219: | ||
:Keyed idea [[User:Nut|Nut]] ([[User talk:Nut|talk]]) 14:26, 9 August 2026 (UTC) | :Keyed idea [[User:Nut|Nut]] ([[User talk:Nut|talk]]) 14:26, 9 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
::{{e|fact}} [[User:G-Man|G-Man]] ([[User talk:G-Man|talk]]) 14:26, 9 August 2026 (UTC) | ::{{e|fact}} [[User:G-Man|G-Man]] ([[User talk:G-Man|talk]]) 14:26, 9 August 2026 (UTC) | ||
:Came here to post this. [[User:SumerianArcheologist|SumerianArcheologist]] ([[User talk:SumerianArcheologist|talk]]) 13:50, 10 August 2026 (UTC) | |||
== Dear Mr. Man == | == Dear Mr. Man == | ||
Revision as of 13:50, 10 August 2026


↓ ↓ ↓ Everyone below me is gay as fuck they gay as fuckkkkk Funnybenny18 TheCatalan1977 Cobblestone all of you are gay as fuckkkkkkkkk --JakJalopy 🚗 (talk) 16:25, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
we js making shit up now?
bro it didnt even start yet Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
- cousin😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 AwardedAccountAward (talk) 19:28, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
give it some time, something might come of this, then again nothing ever happens
- Nothing ever happens if you dont make it happen TheCatalan1977 (talk) 10:56, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Schedule for deletion
total waste of hard drive space -Paranoid (talk) 11:17, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Deleting this will only make you all more suspicious. Anything to hide? TheCatalan1977 (talk) 13:16, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- TRANSLATION OF WHAT PARANOID IS SAYING: >QY VEY! HQVV DARE YOU GQYIM KNQVV! THIS PAGE DQESN'T NEED TO EXIST! QVIT NQTICING! -- Ranch (Talk) 13:19, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Ponuts lover stop. Kazakh soy (talk) 13:27, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
^zoonigger above me (talk)
Shit Article
I Looked At This Article Half A Day Ago And Thought It Was A Stretch, I Look At It Now And It's All Shitty Hallucinations That Are Tied Together To Prop Up A Seventh Soysurgency Article For No Fucking Reason... Other Than To Be Le Heckin Soys At War!!!
Nothing In This Article Has Any Relevance To Any Other Topic In This Page, They're All Loose Events That Have Deliberately Been Written To Make It Seem Like They're All Connected And All Happened After One Another (With No Sources To Back These Claims Up BTW)
Fucking AIDS Hunky Article Can We Blank This Shit Already JFC Just Merge This Shit To History Pages Or Happenings Or Whatever, This Is Just A Huge Fuck Off Hallucination That Some Hunky Keeps Dreaming Of --Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:40, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- wordswordswords AwardedAccountAward (talk) 14:57, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Old Boy Said Wordswordswords On The Wordswordswords Soyjack Website Ain't No Way Bruh 💀💀💀💀💀💀 --Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:00, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- AwardedAccountAward (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- I Do This And You Don't... So Who Actually Wins In The End
--Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:06, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- I Do This And You Don't... So Who Actually Wins In The End
- AwardedAccountAward (talk) 15:03, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
- Old Boy Said Wordswordswords On The Wordswordswords Soyjack Website Ain't No Way Bruh 💀💀💀💀💀💀 --Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:00, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Meds and BBC required for author
Not sure why I'm being listed on the "pro Furcord" side when all I did was shitfling with the owner of Furcord. The citation of my thread is included in the article, which leads me to believe the author is either ESL with an incredibly poor grasp of the English language, incredibly stupid, or a combination of both. Not exactly sure how one can list MP as being "anti Furcord" when he was literally the owner of it. Can someone explain this to me please? Dove (talk) 16:39, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Need snopes for swinny involvement
If it's true, we need to cite it please TheCatalan1977 (talk) 17:02, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
Units
More information about them since there are more users involved in this conflict. Kazakh soy (talk) 18:05, 29 July 2026 (UTC)
SNCA
None of this is happening, it is all SNCA. --MymyWABAG (talk) 00:37, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Literal who, zartypedo und GuPfag above me^ Kazakh soy (talk) 05:31, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
just shut it down
The frogposters were right Gzard (talk) 16:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- Another """fun""" experiment from mustard to drive user engagement and boost PPH... Genuinely sickening. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- I’m so sick of this shit... Can we just make the Admin 6 page a redirect to Mustard already... -- Ranch (Talk) 17:28, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
nothing ever happens
nothing ever happens Contributor (talk) 19:40, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- That is your opinion, which doesn't qualify as a tip with bold red text at the front of the page. Rickert (talk) 19:55, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
- this entire page is opinionated i don't think that matters Contributor (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2026 (UTC)
Commanders and Users
When adding someone, try to add a reference or note (if they are noteworthy enough) for more info & clarity. 
FENIRINIS WILL BE SACRIFICED TO ALLAH
YOU ARE A PEDOPHILE
Move the "Soyvil War 5" article to this one, and return it to how it was previously before MP unlocked it
The events transpiring are basically the same as the last soysurgency, and nowhere near as disruptive as the last soyvil war
>Cobblestone Protected "Soyvil War 5": Unlock this when something happens. Make sure something REALLY happened. Good luck.
--Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:46, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- i talk but nobody listens Cobblestone (talk) 15:51, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
- there is a reason for that nigger Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 15:55, 31 July 2026 (UTC)
marge
Everyone calls it the fifth soyvil war, regardless of whether or not it qualifies as one, thats the consensus. Why is this being moved back here without discussion Rickert (talk) 02:15, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- there were multiple people saying to move it to this page in the talkpage and they got ignored though Cobblestone (talk) 02:18, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- so because 2 people said to move this article to "Seventh Soysurgency" you're just going to move it and not count the rest of the soysphere? cobble you aren't a jannie anymore btw QolaTypeShit (talk) 02:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Doesn't change the fact the community preferred to call it "Fifth Soyvil War" instead of "Seventh Soysurgency". See this. Also, see this. There was no new recent discussion that was "ignored". Changing the title of the page now is too disruptive. Rickert (talk) 02:24, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- it's called that because the mods ignored the people saying to move it and kept it on "Soyvil War 5"
chicken and egg scenario Cobblestone (talk) 02:25, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- i also dont need to bring up how this isnt a soyvil war by any measure, soyvil wars involve multiple site administrations and admins and different parties all trying to dox each other and ddos each other, this is just some /soy/ spam that died out in a week. Cobblestone (talk) 02:27, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I agree it doesn't meet the standard, but the community consensus on the name is Fifth Soyvil War. And nobody was recently ignored either, if they refused to respond and discuss further, that's on them. And who exactly was ignored recently? G-man and I responded to the last discussion on the talk page. The name is solidified in the Booru. Why cause inconsistency? Rickert (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- so basically you admit that it's not a soyvil war but you want to keep it on the old name, because... just because? changing things for the better starts now, it was called Soyvil War 5 because no one bothered to move it, and if you just move it again to the more accurate name people will call it the Seventh Soysurgency, we will also want to save soyvil war 5 for when something actually happens. Cobblestone (talk) 02:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Because that's consensus, not my opinion. Regardless of whether it's technically correct or not, Wikis don't get to decide the facts first, if the community, in this case specifically Booru users, decide to switch to "Seventh Soysurgency" then we can reflect that change. Since when was this place establishing the narrative? If you wanna rewrite the page, go ahead, but at least make sure to mention the name problem so everyone understands why we suddenly decided to switch up the name. Rickert (talk) 02:41, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- jannies already established narrative here by not moving the page when people asked though, this is just reverting that
. either way i wrote a section about some people referring to this as "Soyvil War 5" in the intro for you, along with my other page improvements, thoughts? Cobblestone (talk) 02:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- You don't need a janny to move a page. If they thought it was necessary and a mistake they should've been bold and moved it back when the change was made. Anyways, if it improves the page content and, as I understand, you think informing people on the name error to avoid the mistake in the future is a good idea, I agree. You don't have to incorporate anything for me, I just care about the process and page quality. This discussion should also help hopefully avoid any further switcheroos in the future. Also, Soyvil War 5 page should redirect to here until this event is over, then blanked and locked till the real one happens. Rickert (talk) 02:55, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- jannies already established narrative here by not moving the page when people asked though, this is just reverting that
- Because that's consensus, not my opinion. Regardless of whether it's technically correct or not, Wikis don't get to decide the facts first, if the community, in this case specifically Booru users, decide to switch to "Seventh Soysurgency" then we can reflect that change. Since when was this place establishing the narrative? If you wanna rewrite the page, go ahead, but at least make sure to mention the name problem so everyone understands why we suddenly decided to switch up the name. Rickert (talk) 02:41, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- so basically you admit that it's not a soyvil war but you want to keep it on the old name, because... just because? changing things for the better starts now, it was called Soyvil War 5 because no one bothered to move it, and if you just move it again to the more accurate name people will call it the Seventh Soysurgency, we will also want to save soyvil war 5 for when something actually happens. Cobblestone (talk) 02:33, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- I agree it doesn't meet the standard, but the community consensus on the name is Fifth Soyvil War. And nobody was recently ignored either, if they refused to respond and discuss further, that's on them. And who exactly was ignored recently? G-man and I responded to the last discussion on the talk page. The name is solidified in the Booru. Why cause inconsistency? Rickert (talk) 02:31, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- i also want to rewrite this page and make it less dogshit so wait for that first please, im on it. Cobblestone (talk) 02:29, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- it's called that because the mods ignored the people saying to move it and kept it on "Soyvil War 5"
- Doesn't change the fact the community preferred to call it "Fifth Soyvil War" instead of "Seventh Soysurgency". See this. Also, see this. There was no new recent discussion that was "ignored". Changing the title of the page now is too disruptive. Rickert (talk) 02:24, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- so because 2 people said to move this article to "Seventh Soysurgency" you're just going to move it and not count the rest of the soysphere? cobble you aren't a jannie anymore btw QolaTypeShit (talk) 02:28, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Why was this moved
'Everyone calls its a soyvil war. A large amount of soyteens were banned The PPH is significantly lower
Cobblestone is a faggot who leaks when xhir le hecking wiki isnt perfect. Rape quote
Rape Mustard
Rape Cobblestone
FUCK NIGGERSSSS'
- above me is the editor who forced the name "Soyvil War 5" and kept reverting it from funnybenny in the first place DNI https://soyjakwiki.org/index.php?title=Seventh_Soysurgency&diff=prev&oldid=452848 Cobblestone (talk) 02:53, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- >above me is an unbothered gigachad who makes mountains out of dirt piles or however the saying goes Glisterald (talk) 03:10, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
>above me is the editor who forced the name "Soyvil War 5" and kept reverting it
>One revert from 5 days ago
Must not giga quote
I wish i did that shit nigga
democracy or something
^^^ vote for fifth soyvil war or goy QolaTypeShit (talk) 03:43, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
--Neptune (talk) 02:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
>VOTED FOR 5TH SOYVIL WAR
voted for Seventh Soysurgency to btfo self important hunks who are simply desperate for relevancy and attention. Not everything is a grand moral crusade especially when it comes to literal SNCA on the bald man glass site. Dove (talk) 03:05, 5 August 2026 (UTC) Respectable opinion saar

we also say this
okay but you forgot the giga...
- added it Glisterald (talk) 03:11, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
vote for 7th soysurgency if you are not fat brown teenager larping as a white """aryan""" adult Aiden's husband (talk) 03:22, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
The only reason phonos used this page for the recent super-relevant spotted drama that is the "Seventh Soysurgency" was because (((somebody))) hyperinflated the furcord leaks into two different pages; the original Seventh Soysurgency page was made to be some schizo's happenings page for the first week it was up for so wikicunts had to use this page for the more relevant "soysurgency" stuff because all the hunkybeans were too scared of destroying said topaz article. No point in keeping this page as Soyvil War 5 or whatever when it died in two days like the other recent soysurgencies
...I said this one week ago if anybody cares fan. Can somebody please tell me I won the internet today? 
- Ill make the other an redirect since it looks like we have an winner Fenriris 🐺 03:47, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
Problematic rewrite
The new rewrite is problematic. I understand this is a sharply divisive and controversial topic, but the page in its current state is subpar. Some of the changes are good, but there are numerous issues, including grammar problems, inconsistencies and contradictions, a lack of neutral POV, and certain sections that come off as almost hostile or editorial, and so on. Simply put, this thing needs more work. I don't want to tangle myself to this page any further, so I would prefer if other editors take notice and do their best.
I am putting up MultipleIssues until this is resolved. Rickert (talk) 06:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- ok Cobblestone (talk) 09:54, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
i fixed all the esl shit + added IRC events + made the article more readable
someone check on it rq and tell if it looks good QolaTypeShit (talk) 08:19, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
bring this back to soyvil war 5
its not over Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 09:58, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- it is it's only still going on in the booru and there's always shitflinging on the booru so it's not a soysurgency anymore G-Man (talk) 11:52, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
It's over?
wtf Perpetualchange (Talk) (About me • Song recommendations) 18:13, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Quotecord tryin to damage control by calling it "snca" and saying that "it's over", glisterald was using this when this whole shit just started as you can see on - Talk:Furcord_leak#this_is_kinda_snca Gzard (talk) 18:15, 5 August 2026 (UTC)
- Soysphere was shut down right after this message. Gzard (talk) 08:15, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- i don't think it's "over" i think it's just slowed down. with this doe they're gonna riot. also me saying the furcord shit was snca at first was justified, i was in the last furcord leak and nothing had happened to me and that didnt get a wiki page so i thought this was going to be the same. Glisterald (talk) 08:27, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
files
i tried to check out secapedia for missing images but it was mostly just some snca about autisticnuswa instead of the important images, i'll look around some more Cobblestone (talk) 12:32, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- for now a good idea is to track down the uploaders and ask them if they still have the files on their pc Cobblestone (talk) 12:33, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I know that @User:Neptune has some. Thats why I created that mission after all :) Give it time Fenriris 🐺 13:18, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- I am semi automatically reuploading whatever images that can be saved, so if there's any by the time I get to this date period I will reupload whatever is left, but its always best for original uploaders to reupload Rickert (talk) 12:35, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- thank you chud. some files look like they're both uploaded but not like the image on Boorubux. do i reupload those or is it fine? Cobblestone (talk) 12:36, 7 August 2026 (UTC)
- Are you like doint it from your browser cache? I just backed up mine, so I would not mind having your script so I can reupload whatever was missed by yours. Very cool Chud! :) Fenriris 🐺 14:19, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

So many damn missing files
Cuckflare hanging itself did some shit to this wiki
Marge
Marge if this soysurgency resulted in the transfer of power to salt and therefore an anti-Quote victory shouldnt this be considered a soyvil war?
- unrelated event. --
Gem (talk) 09:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC) 09:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I don't think changing this page's name again is a good idea no matter what at this point. Scroll up a little. Rickert (talk) 10:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Someone make a detractor perspective
That way, we can contain Funnybenny and stop him from edit warring. Nut (talk) 13:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Detractor perspectives are ass and should be avoided. Simply ban him from the page instead for vandalism and/or edit warring Rickert (talk) 13:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- "Edit warring when" it's fixing a page. The fuck you two jackasses talking about? The page is incoherent and vastly underwhelming- it doesn't even talk about the goddamn ending of this so called "soysurgency" where the admin LITERALLY admin-ning after these events. How about you fat fucks stop being so myopic about the rules of the wiki and understand how shit the article actually is. It's not edit warring when there's a literal hobgoblin camping the article making 10 edits in a fucking hour with all of his doohickery bullshit he comes up with. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 13:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You are editing the page due to beef with Catalan not to improve the page, there's nobody myopic about the rules when there's no good faith to assume on your part. Quit whining and flaming up the summaries if you want to be taken seriously. Rickert (talk) 14:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah you fat boy try reading the article some time it helps when you know what the fuck you're editing instead of going for points like a M14 bitch. Olympia gods WON. Get the fuck out of my lane rickert and stay in the inert bureaucratic nonsensical process of fixing pages where you wait for jannies to hold your hand through the process bitch ass --Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You're just proving my point. Go back to the Booru for your shit flame wars, nophono wants to deal with your shit here. You don't edit to win here. Rickert (talk) 14:06, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- The same also applies to you @User:TheCatalan1977, why are you edit warring? Rickert (talk) 14:08, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You mad mad because the entire fucking article is a game of Hunky-Telephone and you know it. It's a glorified happenings page, I remember you agreeing with me on that point- but you for some reason allocate the duty of fixing it to the jannies for some reason. You can make your own edits and get rid of bogus claims as a normal user. That is what I intend to do
--Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You lost, your friends lost, your "God" Quote lost, learn to surrender faggot TheCatalan1977 (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Funnybenny is the one edit warring. He undid my edits and insists and insults me. I have to fight back of course TheCatalan1977 (talk) 14:12, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- you're also edit warring tho, you keep censoring my edit. Cobblestone (talk) 14:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Old boy upset because I upset him and made a gemmy page on him (that he leaks over by the way). I'm just a normal feller with no power in this place but TheCatalan1977 is a raving schizo who has been demoted multiple times from approver. I think you'd best choose wisely which opinion matters more on this topic
--Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You're just proving my point. Go back to the Booru for your shit flame wars, nophono wants to deal with your shit here. You don't edit to win here. Rickert (talk) 14:06, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah you fat boy try reading the article some time it helps when you know what the fuck you're editing instead of going for points like a M14 bitch. Olympia gods WON. Get the fuck out of my lane rickert and stay in the inert bureaucratic nonsensical process of fixing pages where you wait for jannies to hold your hand through the process bitch ass --Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You are editing the page due to beef with Catalan not to improve the page, there's nobody myopic about the rules when there's no good faith to assume on your part. Quit whining and flaming up the summaries if you want to be taken seriously. Rickert (talk) 14:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks @User:G-Man Rickert (talk) 14:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
You gay as fuck you gay as fuckkkkk G-Man you gay as fuckkkkkkkkk
https://soybooru.com/forum/gen/thread/48802 <--- Article theme --Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:20, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Unlock the pageeee unlock the pagee you gay as fuck @G-Man unlock the page so I can rewrite it and gem it the fuck up
--Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:22, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Literal manchild above me, if he's not satisfied, he will throw tantrums, speak like a fucking nigger and spam the IDF copypasta. Calm the fuck down. TheCatalan1977 (talk) 14:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Stop edit warring G-Man (talk) 14:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Move request
Move the page to Thremboth Soysurgency because thrembo is the number between 6 & 7 or something. --
- Keyed idea Nut (talk) 14:26, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Came here to post this. SumerianArcheologist (talk) 13:50, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Dear Mr. Man
Lemme tell you summin lemme tell you summin you see that goddamn page- that shit is a glorified happenings page. Before I slightly tweaked it, it was verbal-diarrhoea verbatim from a schizophrenic. It was unorganised and had you jumping around from multiple different events that weren't chronologically related- nor were they related at all! Hell- I wasn't the one who started the goddamn edit war. Some reason Mr. Demoted 5 times in 2 weeks @TheCatalan1977 undos both mine and Cobble's edits because he's a leaky fatbody- you look at his summaries and you can surely tell there's a BIG difference between what I was trying to accomplish and what he was leaky about. I wanted to gem up the fuckin' page but your boy TheCatalan1977 <--------------------- READDDDDDD READDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD kept undoing edits like a motherfucker
I'm the one trying to defend my reorganising of the page's events. Yet I'm the one being called leaky and all vagaries of annoyance from literal whos in the chat. Make it make some fucking sense @G-Man --Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I literally removed leaky SNCA from the Quotists who were still doing damage control, fixed broken links, reorganize infobox info and linked the 2026 outage to the casualties box. If you wanna shitfling make a detractor perspective TheCatalan1977 (talk) 14:30, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- i added you lying about someone being a lolicon and making up evidence and you removed it
Cobblestone (talk) 14:33, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- If there was a reference included, you shouldn't remove it only because you dispute it, especially when it's about you Catalan. You should provide references, especially when it's something you're personally involved in to begin with. Do you have a reputable reference for your claim? @User:TheCatalan1977 Rickert (talk) 14:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Jannybaby, First Name: Emanual; Last Name: Of-Style; waiting for fact-checks before he can go ahead and verify the very clearly statement made in libel and defamation. You know that's exactly why that sort of behavior was mocked back in the Sharty stone-ages, right? --Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:06, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- If there was a reference included, you shouldn't remove it only because you dispute it, especially when it's about you Catalan. You should provide references, especially when it's something you're personally involved in to begin with. Do you have a reputable reference for your claim? @User:TheCatalan1977 Rickert (talk) 14:43, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hmmmmm lemme check my Manual of Style: Oh- there we go. You WILL NOT be biased.
- Hey buddy @TheCatalan1977 you just blow in from stupid town? Check the manual of style. Also I'm not shitflinging shit. I haven't deconstructed any of your edits and I made sure to keep whatever you made in tact. If any of my edits destroyed your improvements to your page then I am well and truly sorry that I did that, but that's a hard choice for me in the first place.
- Also Quotists don't give a fuck about the some shitty SNCA wiki page and that's fact. We're too busy gooning to BMAF porn en masse. Asian HISAs are cute as fuck and you're jealous that you're a swarthy low-down dirt-peddling Sephardi woman, undesirable to many Quotelords. It's okay, I'm into Jewesses. Check my edits and see how constructive they are, then come back and tell me that I'm peddling for some hunky-boogeyman who is currently bleeding out in a British council house. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:36, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Funnybenny, the compromise was slightly in your favor, and yet you're the one who's leaking about it. Even Catalan seemed fine with our middle ground, she was mostly just concerned with your behavior and suggested that we make a detractor perspective too. All you're doing is spamming pastas and leaking about how you didn't get your way on the 'ki. Ahh, the irony of groups that were once supported by the mods leaking about censorship. Nut (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Him removing Cobblestone's edits for no reason is not him being concerned about Funnybenny's behavior. If Cobblestone (or Funnybenny18) is contradicting his narrative with a reputable reference, he doesn't just get to dismiss it. If neither is providing anything but instead shitflinging, then they should both refrain from disrupting the page till they can contribute something meaningful. Rickert (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oh oh oh hey buddy read my fucking paragraphs you dickhead. We don't need a middleman cocksucker in here trying to find a compromise or whatever- great, yeah let the jannies decide- sure. I Guess That's An Ending For Everyone That Everyone Can Accept

- Doesn't matter about the fact that even if I wanted to make cohesive changes and contributions to the page, @TheCatalan1977 would undo them anyway AS CURRENTLY DEMONSTRATED to someone- someone who was literally the head fuckin' admin for the last year. @Rickert I want you to find a long girthy bollard in your local area and slowly slide your anus down it. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:55, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- If you don't want compromise, then why are you on this page? Your cohesive changes were disputed, and you decided to edit war like an ape. If you are worried about Catalan undoing your work, talk instead of being a retarded gorilla. I understand it's difficult for you to not treat the Wiki like the Booru, but every time you sperg like this you just keep nuking any assumption of good faith on your part. Rickert (talk) 14:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Horrry shit pal are you hard of reading or something? I have made it very clear that my grievances aren't the fact that my changes are being removed, my grievances is that there is a human troll living underneath the Seventh Soysurgency article-bridge and will not let me pass ANY edits he doesn't like. And believe ME. I have TRIED talking to him. He is simply NOT negotiable. Give yourself time to think as to why he has been demoted from Approver, both from the Booru and from the Wiki MULTIPLE times in total. Apparently being funny is spergy because I'm having the time of my life coming up with some of the shit I'm saying. This is W gegs for me old boy. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- "human troll living underneath the Seventh Soysurgency article-bridge and will not let me pass ANY edits he doesn't like" is not an excuse for your behavior. You didn't touch this page till @[User:Nut] mentioned the edit war. Had you come here first and mentioned it then you'd be right (ignoring all your other shenanigans). Why he was demoted from the Booru and Wiki is irrelevant. "Having the time of my life" The fact that you're having fun trolling doesn't help you here Funnybenny, at this rate there's no reason to even talk to you since you refuse to actually talk. Far as I'm concerned, you should be blocked from the page. Good day Rickert (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Okay, what the fuck kind of excuse is "undoing edits made by literal ex-admin"? The fuck? I only kicked off proper when that started to happen to Cobble by the way. I'm literal SNCA and I only exist to BTFO L formatting and coherency in some of these articles. You can write an article with EFL but that doesn't mean you can convey what you're trying to explain to readers in EFL. You go to any English course beyond General Education and you'll find that's a hard-pill to swallow. That's all I wanted to do at least, but you know @TheCatalan1977 would deny any edit I make. I don't think you understand what the fuck I'm talking about - or can actually comprehend what I'm talking about since you seem like a W fat moron who says I'm refusing to actually talk when I've written out a whole grand-standing 1000+ words in the last 30 minutes, so I'm glad you're gonna have a good day wrapping your anal flaps around that traffic bollard. Send me those deep penetrations as a recorded video and all will be forgiven. W concessions. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- "human troll living underneath the Seventh Soysurgency article-bridge and will not let me pass ANY edits he doesn't like" is not an excuse for your behavior. You didn't touch this page till @[User:Nut] mentioned the edit war. Had you come here first and mentioned it then you'd be right (ignoring all your other shenanigans). Why he was demoted from the Booru and Wiki is irrelevant. "Having the time of my life" The fact that you're having fun trolling doesn't help you here Funnybenny, at this rate there's no reason to even talk to you since you refuse to actually talk. Far as I'm concerned, you should be blocked from the page. Good day Rickert (talk) 15:09, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- i didnt edit war and my stuff still got removed and then locked Cobblestone (talk) 14:59, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You can add it back when the duo loses interest in raping the page. They should've been blocked from the page due to edit warring, but oh well. Rickert (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- i already tried that like 3 times and he insta-undid it every time Cobblestone (talk) 15:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hence why he should've been blocked from the page Rickert (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- btw he also did the same thing to me on the furcord page when i tried to remove his fake lolicon accusation, and jannies did nothing Cobblestone (talk) 15:04, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Cobblestone, if you were still an admin and it was someone else, wouldn't you block him from the page for continuous malicious edits? Every time he or someone else does it, they should just be barred from editing that page cause clearly they've got personal interest. Rickert (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- yes but unfortunately im not an admin anymore, and if i raise too much of a stink people say im trying to "mind control fenriris" so i stopped Cobblestone (talk) 15:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- It is what it is. Once its unlocked edit it and if he starts reverting without any argument/evidence then he should be barred till he can explain his conduct here. Rickert (talk) 15:15, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Hence why he should've been blocked from the page Rickert (talk) 15:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- i already tried that like 3 times and he insta-undid it every time Cobblestone (talk) 15:01, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- You can add it back when the duo loses interest in raping the page. They should've been blocked from the page due to edit warring, but oh well. Rickert (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Horrry shit pal are you hard of reading or something? I have made it very clear that my grievances aren't the fact that my changes are being removed, my grievances is that there is a human troll living underneath the Seventh Soysurgency article-bridge and will not let me pass ANY edits he doesn't like. And believe ME. I have TRIED talking to him. He is simply NOT negotiable. Give yourself time to think as to why he has been demoted from Approver, both from the Booru and from the Wiki MULTIPLE times in total. Apparently being funny is spergy because I'm having the time of my life coming up with some of the shit I'm saying. This is W gegs for me old boy. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:03, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- If you don't want compromise, then why are you on this page? Your cohesive changes were disputed, and you decided to edit war like an ape. If you are worried about Catalan undoing your work, talk instead of being a retarded gorilla. I understand it's difficult for you to not treat the Wiki like the Booru, but every time you sperg like this you just keep nuking any assumption of good faith on your part. Rickert (talk) 14:58, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Oh oh oh hey buddy read my fucking paragraphs you dickhead. We don't need a middleman cocksucker in here trying to find a compromise or whatever- great, yeah let the jannies decide- sure. I Guess That's An Ending For Everyone That Everyone Can Accept
- Him removing Cobblestone's edits for no reason is not him being concerned about Funnybenny's behavior. If Cobblestone (or Funnybenny18) is contradicting his narrative with a reputable reference, he doesn't just get to dismiss it. If neither is providing anything but instead shitflinging, then they should both refrain from disrupting the page till they can contribute something meaningful. Rickert (talk) 14:50, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Notice how nobody said anything about censorship? It wasn't about the compromise either. My entire point is that I cannot guarantee any change would be made to that page without @TheCatalan1977 reverting it because he didn't like it. I was right to assume this was happened because moments later the same exact thing happened to Cobblestone. I don't give a fuck about what this article says- well, to an extent. TheCatalan1977's articles are full of unverified claims based on his own vein knowledge on the subject with a HEAVY HEAVY HEAVY HUNKY TWINKY SEX MACHINE BIAS against anything moderatorpilled- they annoy me because people trust this wiki as a verifiable source of information and this fucker is rampant with stupid idiotic DE JURE HUNKY claims; that was what Cobblestone was trying to correct by the way. That's why I cannot IN GOOD FAITH write this article without being offensive about my edits, because I know if I played it safe and fixed the article TheFuckerman would undo my article because of some SNCA he doesn't like.
- Funnybenny, the compromise was slightly in your favor, and yet you're the one who's leaking about it. Even Catalan seemed fine with our middle ground, she was mostly just concerned with your behavior and suggested that we make a detractor perspective too. All you're doing is spamming pastas and leaking about how you didn't get your way on the 'ki. Ahh, the irony of groups that were once supported by the mods leaking about censorship. Nut (talk) 14:41, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- i added you lying about someone being a lolicon and making up evidence and you removed it
- Why the fuck are the wikiphonos illiterate? Can't you see the point I'm making? Am I communing with Bulgarian henchmen or people who know how to write a cohesive, understandable article based on a recent event with relevant sources and contextual narratives? This IS my point, and I've clearly communicated this in every paragraph I've had in these discussion pages. I couldn't be possibly more right- and god help me for saying this because that's always a telltale sign for someone being stubborn about their beliefs but I'm SEEING A LOT OF CONVERSATION ABOUT CENSORSHIP, when that IS very much so what is happening to people like me, and people like Cobblestone. Fuck ya'll wikinoons. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 14:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
this whole talkpage is a goddamn circus holy fuck why do you guys care so much about some snca nothingburger conflict that ended as you expect (hunkies pretending to migrate to swedishfail website but returned like goyim slaves) AwardedAccountAward (talk) 14:54, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Holy shit funnybenny18, you really are leaking even when I leave. Get a life loser TheCatalan1977 (talk) 15:13, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Yeah bitch the world doesn't exclusively revolve around you, I have other cocksuckers to make fun of ITT. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 15:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
we've won
holy raisin Gzard (talk) 15:22, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- you didn't win shit AwardedAccountAward (talk) 15:24, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
Anti-Quotist victory
Infobox. There is no evidence that Quote transferred the servers due to the event. This is speculation at best. It is better to delete it and bolden the transfer instead, which basically overshadowed this whole already mostly-dead affair. Rickert (talk) 16:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Outcomes from the transfer, like Salt unbanning people, is also unrelated to this. Rickert (talk) 16:02, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Intro should be better now. I don't really care for this page to bother improving it any further, but it seems good now. @User:Nut what says you? Rickert (talk) 16:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Looks pretty good to me Rick. But I would add that Quote's departure and replacement with a namefag-nuking "hunky", regardless of how closely it was related to the conflict, obviously made it (effectively) an anti-quotist victory. Nut (talk) 16:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- It is too divisive of an opinion and I just can't see the connection. According to Mustard, the man was mostly DNB during the period, rule change and all sure but I don't think anyone can lay out what exactly happened behind the curtains so to speak. Sure, people who hate Quote are happy, but I think that belongs on the transfer page, the detractor page for Quote, but not here. For all we know, this shenanigan could've never occurred, the downtime happens regardless, and the transfer happens anyway. I am not speculating here, I am just saying there's no evidence to assert otherwise. As compromise, the handover is already boldened and notes Quote's departure, if you want to mention more go ahead, I really don't wanna bother figuring out how to make it work. This whole page is disastrous from the start
Rickert (talk) 16:29, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I'm probably biased but I find it hard to believe that Quotes decision to sell the site simply happened to coincide with what is probably the largest period of public outrage throughout his reign. Especially when considering his prior promise to JSID rather than ever selling Polk (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- It is too divisive of an opinion and I just can't see the connection. According to Mustard, the man was mostly DNB during the period, rule change and all sure but I don't think anyone can lay out what exactly happened behind the curtains so to speak. Sure, people who hate Quote are happy, but I think that belongs on the transfer page, the detractor page for Quote, but not here. For all we know, this shenanigan could've never occurred, the downtime happens regardless, and the transfer happens anyway. I am not speculating here, I am just saying there's no evidence to assert otherwise. As compromise, the handover is already boldened and notes Quote's departure, if you want to mention more go ahead, I really don't wanna bother figuring out how to make it work. This whole page is disastrous from the start
- Looks pretty good to me Rick. But I would add that Quote's departure and replacement with a namefag-nuking "hunky", regardless of how closely it was related to the conflict, obviously made it (effectively) an anti-quotist victory. Nut (talk) 16:19, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Intro should be better now. I don't really care for this page to bother improving it any further, but it seems good now. @User:Nut what says you? Rickert (talk) 16:17, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
page is good now
it has a good balance and isnt too opinionated in either way, if thecatalan comes and starts bulldozing it again Cobblestone (talk) 16:23, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
catalan
I can't hide it anymore, I'm absolutely INFATUATED by thecatalan1977. That cute little tradcath conquistador. Everytime I see a shitty edit and that little name side by side, I can't help but fantasize about the malding shitskin making the posts behind the screen, and I get an erection. I have a confession to make, every couple of nights or so I jerk off to that one picture that thecatalan1977 posted on the 'ru of awardsan in a diaper. It's so fucking hot. Everytime I see it I can't help but imagine that diaper wrapped around my cock and slowing stroking it as it does a wet *shlick* *shlick* *shlick* sound from the poopy and peepee. This is my confession, I just had to get it off my chest. thecatalan1977, I hope you forgive me, but I also hope you suck me off one day. Dove (talk) 17:37, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
should we rename this back to being the 5th soyvil war?
Considering it actually resulted in quote resigning as admin I think it's fair to say that it was actually impactful on a level which soysurgencies aren't. You could argue it's too short but I'd argue that the conflict has been building up for months, the 4th soyvil war took awhile to actually escalate after all. --Admiralofsoy (talk) 19:14, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- I believe we should. I thought the consensus was that it should be regarded as a soysurgency unless something significant came of it. An ownership change is certainly significant. Polk (talk) 19:49, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- If I were the only person on this wiki, I'd definitely move this article to "Soyvil War 5" in a quotosecond (the time it takes for light in a vacuum to travel the distance of Quote's clitty.) The problem is, like Rickbert and others have said, we can't actually prove that Quote packed his bags as a direct result of the war/soysurgency. But then again, we probably can't prove that he didn't resign because of it either. The other problem is that it would cause even more chaos and talkpage shitflinging between the remaining quotists and the rest of us. Nut (talk) 20:06, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
MAAAAAAAWWWWWWDS
Please ban Funnybenny (and if you wish, me and Catalan as well) from editing both this article and its talkpage until next week. All the thirty-minute ban did was temporarily move the edit war to this talk page. I sense there's a good chance that we're all wrong. Nut (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2026 (UTC)
- Shut up bitch make the article better then ask for a ban. I'm clearly fixing a problem. All you fuckers do is hog my work and tell me to get bent, useless slothen-pile'o shit. --Funnybenny18 (talk) 11:07, 10 August 2026 (UTC)





