Soyjak Wiki talk:Undo the Gradingcaust

> ~ Spruce (talk) 14:15, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

> ~

di this, nocado likes it anyways. Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

my opinion

I think that quality headers should be brought back, but with just the bare essentials (gemerald, gem, coal, brimstone) and not the super exaggerated ones (except on joke pages like how templates like {{HyperDoctos}} are used), and somehow controlled by like the bibisi gods above using locked mediawiki pages to prevent edit warring or algo like this. ~ Spruce (talk) 15:25, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

well, yeah. more or less the ones on SNCApedia minus the gem that saved the party (no one uses that), and maybe like 2 others. but the rest should all be brought back. :fact: Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 15:26, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

My thoughts

Definitely undo it but only for gemerald, gem, coal and brimstone -- Ranch (Talk) 15:33, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

tsmt, the brimstone template was my favourite at the time TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 15:35, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

^rare FACTVM from mushroot Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 15:37, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

poll

Ironically, the poll on the page demonstrates the same issue that the grades had anyways; theres too many options that could just be conveyed with 2-3 and most are just more flashy variants of one another ~ Spruce (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

This is exactly what I meant when I said that the rating templates had a problem with the vast majority of them just being the same thing but in a different color. The option spam was one of the things I disliked about rating templates in the first place before cobblestone nuked them all and started the gradingcaust. If cobblestone even changes her mind in the first place, there's going to be exactly 2 remaining gradings left since there's not really any feasible way to make objective dividing lines between specific qualities for what are inherently subjective templates. Otherwise you'd just have a mess of redundant templates with identical usecases and potential useless nigger wars between which specific positive or negative template to use.

Or in shorter terms: we don't need a dozen templates that say the same thing GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 15:50, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

^IRL obsessed jartycuck^{[citation needed]} Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 15:53, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

I agree with you but that's not the point of this protest. It's about bringing quality headers as a thing, but how exactly they'll be handled is a different question Gzard (talk) 15:55, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

undo it now

only three people voted for the grading caust, and 7 people voted against it. i think we have a winner. Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 15:39, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

those three people are TroonletBrapped and his alts TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

>Everyone who disagrees with me is one boogeyman and his alts

BBC and meds now GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 15:46, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

^obsessed award Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 15:47, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Just let it go broIronEcho (talk) 21:04, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

deadest protest ever

nothing happened agian. Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 19:41, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

It's sncaIronEcho (talk) 19:52, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

i'm just surprised anyone thought it had a serious chance at succeeding rofl GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 20:33, 17 June 2026 (UTC)