Talk:Anthro.foo

Aren't all mentions of the F**ey banned of the 'ki, just like with other hostile splinters? 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 23:45, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

you have entire articles about some doe TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 16:30, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

how the fuck isn't this hostile? it contains insanely vile content TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 16:36, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

are you sure? i opened it and saw nothing, not even porn Cobblestone (talk) 16:46, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

nah nigga, better consider it paedophillic Gzard (talk) 17:08, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

I went on it and saw nothing pedophilic, maybe I'm just not looking very closely though 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 17:10, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

They don't raid, they're not that hostile AFAIK. North (talk) 17:16, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

--Nickers (Talk/Contrib) 17:16, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Pretty sure the wiki you took this from has a specific category for this splinter and it shows that plenty of cordniggers use it, including ones i've made a page on the past (midd for example) and the gallery shows some vile shit, whilst they don't raid I think they upload all type of brimstone on the 'ru while chudfagging, i have one thread were i expose one of these freaks on the broom one of the posts shows how two furfags were coordinating to upload furry lolishit on the 'ru and one of them is a fooeycuck and i can only assume the other guy is one too. https://soybooru.com/forum/meta/thread/13254

Speaking of which, said category also has an entire page exposing the administration and namefags from that site or at least a few, the owner was on a pedocord with some very questionable users.

Also that they collaborated with the kuzzy in the past, which by itself is also another very questionable website or at least it used to be. Alson2 (talk) 17:53, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

gigacha.de also used to have some very questionable users in the past, AFAIK most of the gitty users who were still around migrated to that site just under different nicknames. North (talk) 18:19, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

The owner is a soycorder though, there's an entire gallery showing he was on a pedocord on the wiki cobblestone copied this from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alson2 (talk • contribs)

The whole site is a product of cordniggers that call themselves Floofs who are all permabanned from the sharty Soytanator (talk) 19:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

>The whole site is a product of cordniggers that call themselves Floofs who are all permabanned from the sharty

The site was created after the 10m /soy/ GET to serve as a home for the furfags while quotes clitty combusted, floofniggers barely have anything to do with the creation of it, i will say that its creator's background is still pretty cordish doe — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~Chud74061 (talk • contribs)

Not really but what i wanted to talk about it's the groomercord associated with the site, according to 'pedia page several furfag namefags were involved even the before mentioned middnightly (they were literally playing 'blox on the server) among others, I think I even reconigze the name of one the person on the screenshot because they were posting furry shit while namefagging on /qa/ a few months ago, they were literally talking about trying to groom some underage namefag and had members of the 'farms on their server plus the site as shown on the gallery has this userbase of people who joke about cunny.

How is this not a pedophile site. Alson2 (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Every site has it's bad apples doebeitore 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 19:47, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Isn't this site hostile btw, so as a result shouldnt it be wiped? Same with that gigachad site. I somewhat remember the two sites once being labeled as hostile. Or is it too SNCA for anyone to care? Fenriris 🐺 19:52, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

They don't raid the sharpie, they're not that hostile AFAIK. North (talk) 19:54, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Ah got it. Thanks 19:57, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

You forgot that the admin of the site was on a soycord and that they dont raid the sharty but they upload brimstone to the ru including what i've mentioned before, the furfag lolishit art Alson2 (talk) 19:56, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Would this be appreciated?

This page is contains information that varies from misleading to lying from averi.foo and SNCApedia braps. I can write a draft I feel would be more informative and less biased but I feel it wouldn't be appreciated by the users here and would immediately be promptly brapped up again by leaking clitties. ~Chud55867 (talk) 19:57, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Sure, why not North (talk) 20:03, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Do dis 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 20:03, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

yeah, as long as it's real info Cobblestone (talk) 20:04, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Ill write the source on a note doc instead of making an edit since this would be rehauling the page. ~Chud55867 (talk) 20:08, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

just keep this on the 'pedia, bringing these pages here are just going to cause edit warring amongst vooeycucks and fooeycucks, and why are you giving any rights of non bias to these fags, their admin is a literal cordnigger pedo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alson2 (talk • contribs)

alson2 please stop leaking North (talk) 20:26, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Here's what I would do, https://u.pone.rs/flewxicg.txt ~Chud55867 (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Good draft, add it. Also you misspelt "namefeild". North (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

ok, do it. Cobblestone (talk) 21:41, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I just didnt want to completely nuke a page as a chudfag out of the blue ~Chud55867 (talk) 21:51, 7 May 2026 (UTC)