Talk:Soyjak Wiki

From Soyjak Wiki, the free ensoyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

cringe

based

i think this page should redirect to Soyjak Wiki

i cant edit this page anymore except through source.

>law removed "operated by Ageleno"

this edit pending approval stuff is so gemmy I'm glad I can't even write a small comment like this without having to wait for a janny to approve it /s

Dipsy (talk) 02:05, 1 May 2025 (EST)

Happy 5 year anniversary

[edit source]

OopooPoopoo (talk) 16:04, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

nu logo for the next 24 hours? Enteryourusername (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
happy 5th anniversary, do this North (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
User:Cobblestone do this GapeNewell (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Cobblestone do dis!! Here's to another year at the bald men with glasses wiki 🎉 〜 MarketPliers (leak here) 16:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
ok Cobblestone (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
happy 5th brapday o algo Shadilay (talk) 17:28, 29 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Can we please remove the cringy template about literal who

[edit source]

It's like adding Quotey template to the soyjak.party article, remove it please thank you ~Chud36036 (talk) 06:55, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

marge where GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 07:18, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
xhe's talking 'bout the cobblestone template Gzard (talk) 07:19, 23 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

There's some outdated info that I can't edit

[edit source]

Soyjak_Wiki#Moderation_staff
Why yes, I care fan about some SNCA info. ClanDestiny (talk) 01:11, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Fixed 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion

[edit source]

Add this to the header; "This wiki features the irrelevant, retarded, and autistic ramblings of shut-in teenagers and manchildren. It is recommended you pursue more fruitful endeavors rather than waste your time here. I have made that mistake before, and I regret it all greatly"

What kind of margearld suggestion is that? No Fenriris 🐺 10:05, 19 July 2026 (UTC)Reply

Should User:Administrat0r be listed as the Admin now?

[edit source]

?
Or the "moderator triumvirate" or whatever we're calling this. Since technically there arent any bureaucrats. Soyoyuki (talk) 00:19, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply

yes definitely –Gem 💎 (talk) 00:20, 14 August 2026 (UTC) 00:20, 14 August 2026 (UTC)Reply