:::I want to edit war with someone who can ban me [[User:Limbusfag123|Limbusfag123]] ([[User talk:Limbusfag123|talk]]) 08:26, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
:::I want to edit war with someone who can ban me [[User:Limbusfag123|Limbusfag123]] ([[User talk:Limbusfag123|talk]]) 08:26, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
:::: like when i was an admin, why do you think edit wars would stop when i showed up with my fancy colored name and changed something in an article, as opposed to some random chud editing it? anything you do as a janny is taken differently, editors can't know when you've suddenly decided to switch back and forth from regular editor mode to janny mode. when i was an admin, if i really wanted to edit war, i would do it logged out. [[User:Cobblestone|Cobblestone]] ([[User talk:Cobblestone|talk]]) 08:36, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
:::: like when i was an admin, why do you think edit wars would stop when i showed up with my fancy colored name and changed something in an article, as opposed to some random chud editing it? anything you do as a janny is taken differently, editors can't know when you've suddenly decided to switch back and forth from regular editor mode to janny mode. when i was an admin, if i really wanted to edit war, i would do it logged out. [[User:Cobblestone|Cobblestone]] ([[User talk:Cobblestone|talk]]) 08:36, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Alr i ll make sure that i'll use an alt or otherwise make it unknown for users that janny is edit warring with them. But in my advocacy i can say that there were other jannies edit warring with me so it was fine [[User:Gzard|Gzard]] ([[User talk:Gzard|talk]])
Revision as of 08:41, 27 July 2026
>The account Gzard has been 'nished by Broot for the following reason(s):
Rule G3a - You WILL NOT vandalize Soyjak Wiki pages: Repeat offender
Fuck you nigga you made my clitty leak
my clitty is leaking
~Chud4185 (talk)
what did i do Gzard (talk) 09:04, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
I'm so sorry bro :( ~Chud9811 (talk) 09:10, 20 March 2026 (UTC)
Why did you vandalized my user-page?
Not cool man. Kyrgyz (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
I didn't vandalise it. Adding user templates is not a vandal behaviour, I have merely indicated your poor english skills. Gzard (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2026 (UTC)
Edit
'pologies for reverting your edit on Broot, assumed it was removal of information --Carrot (talk) 17:45, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
yeah. If you refer to the Broot#Brootbaiting section i referred to linking and supporting shroom as a way to bait Broot since he's in a "war" with it. I don't even use shroom Gzard (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
ah, so it was a clittyban GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEG AwardedAccountAward (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Well you obviously are since you leaked when we removed the link from the article, come out of closet nushroomgay --Broot (talk) 11:19, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
meds i didn't leak, i just saw plenty of confusion amongst soyim regarding the status of shroom, i linked it for the first time, some phono removed it, i linked second time and then i asked about it on the noticeboard, north said it was fine if the admins were fine with it, and since the link stayed up for days or even a week i assumed the fact that cobble and others already saw it. Like i didn't shill for shroom or anything like that, the only thing i did is i said that it was fine to use it Gzard (talk) 11:24, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Whatever you say, removing the shroomslut parts from section --Broot (talk) 11:27, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
As long as you don't link splinters you should be fine. Cobblestone (talk) 10:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
never did and never will Gzard (talk) 11:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
Yo
Welcome back.
Cool Alpha User
You defended my rusty page so youre aryan or something 〜 Truecel43000
Really, why not? This template is pretty good and gets the point across Gzard (talk) 20:27, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Niggerhell source code, and the way it works makes it hard for recipients to reply as the [edit source] button takes the user here. North (talk) 20:31, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
I don't think it's that big of a problem to completely trash a pretty good template Gzard (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
It's just far better to leave a normal comment on the user's talk page. Please don't use the {{rejected}} template again. North (talk) 20:36, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Inquiry
Why was my edit rejected? Your opinion on it being "ugly" is subjective. It was entirely relevant to the article. Remember, you're supposed to encourage productive contributions. Thanks. Pachka sigarets (talk)
The quote was relevant but it was put right in the middle of an article. Gzard (talk) 20:17, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
So maybe you should move it instead of deleting the edit as a whole. Pachka sigarets (talk)
you do that --Statis (talk) 20:33, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
I can't edit a pending edit, i can only either reject it or approve it. Gzard (talk) 20:19, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
The Chad Barnstarfor shitting on north on his talk page
rejected template
Hi, please don't manually bring back archived templates like you did here, it was archived for a reason. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 15:18, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
Please do not use this template on people's talk pages, we've[who?] already agreed to archive it. If you want to bring it back you should have a discussion about it on it's talk page. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 16:36, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
this dude really wants to bring back some useless garbage template with niggerhell source code geeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeg AwardedAccountAward (talk) 16:47, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
instead of 50000 subpages why not just restore them on the template page itself and use the archived template template? Cobblestone (talk) 11:42, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
oh those are edited templates, well in that case you can find them in the template page history itself Cobblestone (talk) 11:45, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
(You) are now a Helper!As a Helper, you're responsible for upholding the rules of the wiki.
Please check the following as a guideline on your basic operations.
Congratulations. Codex (talk) 15:05, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
shemmy page
I get not wanting to falseflag a website but this site is quite literally the quintessential faggot soyjak website. I don't understand why you're so inclined to defend it from being labeled as "le homo site" when a lot of the site's culture is being a fudge-packing (most cases are probably pooners) /qa/ obsessed oldfag larp
Thread about liking cocks (SFW, just gay) up on soy with no visible moderation or moving: [1]
Thread "Is there anything wrong with being gay?" on /qa/ (and before you say "low-hanging-fruit") -- 90% of shemmycucks that replied seriously answered along the lines of "only if you don't make it your entire personality or whatever" [2]
As far as I'm concerned, /kgs/ is a Kuzzy bunker or sort of immigrant chamber, and if you remember how they used to be I'm pretty sure they were rabidly homosexual. Site is also deemed to this day hostile even with it's death
You really think with a straight face that no pooner hands were involved in the creation of Tama or Mameson for some other examples?
Just here to hear your reasoning because I don't want to continue to edit war over something as trivial as a template.
You can't really call an entire website faggy just because of a couple of threads. A much more devious raisin is posted on /soy/ and especially /qa/ every single day, there was /nate/ too Gzard (talk) 13:19, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
I suppose, but we all know soy is entirely flooded with bait, with merely the occasional Jakbox raid. It hasn't been seriously usable since (I would say) No Nut November.
And Nate WAS a thing and is no longer a thing, and the Shemmy is historically both by userbase and by administration, lax on homosexuality and such, whereas we have a history of our administrations and userbase (including the self-hating HTSMs) typically being hostile or otherwise perterbed by faggotry.
And it's not just a couple of threads, it's easy to find this sort of behavior along with tranny and aspie shit all over the place. I find that the Shemmy is more so a bunker or altchan specifically for trannies and /qa/ homos, along with (website-I-wont-name) immigrants (who are some of the gayest people I've seen around the soysphere) and banned/underage sharty users.
I digress, and I'm not gonna put the template back on there, but I must say compared to most splinters I've smelt the most homosexuality out of the Shemmy than any other. H8em (talk) 02:01, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
doxxing aspies le good
doxxing autists le good not le bad Sooty (talk) 13:17, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
Plants_vs._Zombies_FTW_Classic_Caillou_FTL_2020 did absolutely nothing wrong, you guys just picked a random dude and started bullying him. That's wrong. Take it to the kiwifarms at least Gzard (talk) 14:09, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
>Plants_vs._Zombies_FTW_Classic_Caillou_FTL_2020 did absolutely nothing wrong, you guys just picked a random dude and started bullying him. That's wrong. Take it to the kiwifarms at least Gzard you are Selfish little fuck. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sooty (talk • contribs)
Award
The Transgender Barnstarfor still seething about your ban and attempting to gain vengeance by clittynuking broot related content award --Carrot (talk) 11:11, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
log in broot Gzard (talk) 11:24, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
BTW i nvked broot template to compete on the weekly leaderboard with User:GauntletThrown, who added {{Delete}} to over 70 images Gzard (talk) 11:24, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
>e-peen measurement tracker racing because of me deciding to flag a lot of bad unused files for deletion
Pedo jokes result in a 3 day ban not 2 hours. Tar (talk) 14:25, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
It was just a template and it didn't seem like something foodists usually joke about Gzard (talk) 14:38, 13 July 2026 (UTC)
Regarding templates marked for deletion
Consider archiving templates using {{Archived template}} instead of deleting them outright, mainly as to not bloat the deleted templates article further when they eventually get added. 〜 MarketPliers (talk) 12:14, 14 July 2026 (UTC)
you gave me approver template on my user page but I can’t do shit
fenriris didnt agree to reversing the gradingcaust yet, he still has to approve my template existing Cobblestone (talk) 04:32, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
ok he just approved it knock yourself out Cobblestone (talk) 11:10, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
kys cobblenigger fenriris will undo every single bad change you made to this place, also i won. Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 11:17, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Thanks. I guess Fenriris🐺 11:23, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
>kys cobblenigger fenriris will undo every single bad change you made to this place, also i won. ~ Spruce 🌲 (talk) 18:50, 19 July 2026 (UTC)
Nobody is Tar (talk | email) 12:33, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
paranoid sure is. lots of people are. Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 12:36, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Meds hes only shitflinging with you. Tar (talk | email) 12:38, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
he, along side many more users on the booru AND here, seem to hate me to this insane degree, acting like i post tvrkeralds on the daily. Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 12:39, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Yeah because youre a lolcow, theyre mocking you. Tar (talk | email) 12:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
>She doesn't really deserves this. Gradingcaust and supreme shit were bad but I don't think that she deserves thisTar (talk | email) 12:47, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
facts though, i was on the wiki half a year ago and i believe that it was steadily improving, up until the gradingcaust Gzard (talk) 12:49, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
At least stop trying to protect a gegbull from da hwaahsment, making fun of people and being a big meanie is sharty kulchur newsoi. Tar (talk | email) 12:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
*YEAR and a half agofuggen dyslexa.
Harassing innocent people is bad, actually. It's actually a more of an UTTP behaviour. Like Sooty above mi, who advocated for harrasing an innocent autistCHAD named Plants_VS_Zombies_FTW_Classic_Caillou_FTL_2020. There was also a recent UTTP falseflag raid when they doxed and hacked some other random autistGOD and falseflagged as sharty Gzard (talk) 13:11, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Laughing at a booru gegbull for fucking his cousin many after having 4 beers is nothing like harassing some random 'tist. Tar (talk | email) 13:13, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
The way you guys were laughing I think was excessive, he's a good editor after all (I don't concern myself with booru raisin) Gzard (talk)
Youre a massive cuck. Tar (talk | email) 13:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Reminder that the wiki is meant to be unbiased
Your job is to archive information about soy culture, events, people, and stick to the truth AT ALL TIMES with no exception. White washing pages based on your own personal bias won't improve the wiki and you're only going to start appearing as 'dead weight'. Paranoid (talk) 13:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Are you saying I lied about everything I recorded on aryan warriors user page? Because I don't think you mean that Paranoid (talk) 13:15, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I didn't do anything with his user page meds Gzard (talk) 13:17, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
whoops i meant his wiki page Paranoid (talk) 13:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I don't think you lied about EVERYTHING you've said about him, but I do think that you was biased and excessively harassing Gzard (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
>you was biased
Why are these creatures even allowed to edit an english wiki? And I didn't make it harassing; if you couldn't tell already, incest is a very disgusting topic to most people. A little humor doesn't immediately kill the readers vibe Paranoid (talk) 13:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
How is he projecting. Tar (talk | email) 13:18, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
He was the one who was biased to aryan warrior Gzard (talk) 13:23, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I think he shares the same views as almost anyone i.e. "aryan_warrior is a funny lolcow to laugh at and make fun of". Tar (talk | email) 13:26, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I don't think that the article should be written in the way that frames this incident as his entire online persona. I don't oppose doing something similar to Supreme's page for example Gzard (talk) 13:31, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I thought it would be useful to include aspects of aryan warrior's personality so I could offer an explanation as to why he randomly told a bunch of people that he had sex with his cousin. Paranoid (talk) 13:41, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
It doesnt doe. But its a pretty notable thing hes done so its naturally going to be one of the main focuses of the article. Tar (talk | email) 13:33, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
It does doe Gzard (talk) 13:37, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Nothing I told no lie, I only told the story of events that are PUBLICLY AVAILABLE in this section for ANYPONY to read. Your ignorance is unbearable. Paranoid (talk) 13:29, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I didn't imply that you've lied. Gzard (talk) 13:31, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
By saying I'm biased after I documented the info, you imply that you're accusing me of withholding the truth or adulterating it. Paranoid (talk) 13:34, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I don't think that you've understood what I have said. Gzard (talk) 13:37, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I just told you that this is what you imply when you say I'm projecting. It doesn't matter what you meant because this is what this language means. Paranoid (talk) 13:41, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Proposition
Keep both {{Clittycel}} AND {{Aryan}} in the display of the templatewrapper.
Remove the quotes and the image from IRC logs table.
Keep everything else as the latest revision.
The quotes are the funniest shit ever let him get mocked for being incestuous with his cousin bro. Tar (talk | email) 13:40, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I think that quotes frame him in an excessively negative way, and for an outsider they look like as if they were added by some bullies. Gzard (talk) 13:47, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Excessively negative
I was extremely fair. I would have left the page alone and made that my final edit but you are insistent that it's problematic when it really isn't that bad. Paranoid (talk) 13:54, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
You wasn't, the quotes and the image was unnecessary Gzard (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Rejected, if we removed the beer incident then he is a nophono. --Gem (talk) 13:46, 25 July 2026 (UTC) 13:46, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I didn't propose to remove the ENTIRE SECTION. Just the quotes and that image Gzard (talk) 13:47, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Forcing this information onto people in an attempt to court attention is a crime in itself. Obviously this was going to back fire, I'm simply repeating what everyone else is thinking; this is valuable information. Paranoid (talk) 13:52, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
I do think that this is valuable too. But my proposition is to remove quotes and the image that are unncessary, not remove information about the entire incident. Gzard (talk) 14:05, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
The quotes are funny asf. Wdym we cant make fun of lolcows anymore? Tar (talk | email) 14:08, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Aryan warrior is a good-faith editor and a good person, I don't think that he should be a lolcow Gzard (talk) 14:11, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
i was right that somepeople are acting like im worse than tvrkpreme Aryan_warrior aka MINT (talk) 14:13, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Meds. Tar (talk | email) 14:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
His fault for randomly bringing what he did with his cousin up and everyone already considers him a lolcow youre not gonna change that. Tar (talk | email) 14:14, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
He is, he've gotten leaky recently but it's because of his ADHD and ADHD messes up with emotional regulation Gzard (talk) 14:19, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
so tourettes? and nigga i don't think fuc.k.ing your cousin many is good person behavior AwardedAccountAward (talk) 14:21, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
He didn't fuck his cousin. Aryan warrior says that his cousin "rather took an advantage of him" Gzard (talk) 14:25, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
Gzard be like.
>I'm a sad lonely FAGGOT here's some embarrassing information about me PLEASE DON'T BULLY ME WITH IT <Dont worry Aryan_warrior, i got your back! I'll protect you from those big fat meanies.
gzard is aryan_warrior's cousin that pegged him im trans btw and i love bbc AwardedAccountAward (talk) 13:57, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
It wasn't pegging btw. Aryan warrior is extremely ESL, and he thought that pegging means "being pinned to the wall" Gzard (talk) 14:28, 25 July 2026 (UTC)
reminder
you're a janny. controlling what articles say isn't your job. refer to Soyjak_Wiki:Policy#Conduct. paranoid didn't break any rules so until he does go away and let him write whatever he wants, if something really needs to be edited some other editor will do it eventually. Cobblestone (talk) 07:56, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
I'm a janny but also an editor and the aryan warrior page situation was rather a regular edit war, and I didn't ban Paranoid ore any other people from editing the page so I didn't powertrip Gzard (talk) 08:13, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
a yellow name editing something isn't the same as a regular editor doing something, it implies that you're making an administrative action to a page. if you want to really be treated like a regular editor again i suggest you either chudfag your edits or use a non-janny alt. Cobblestone (talk) 08:16, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
tl;dr nobody wants to edit war with someone who can ban them, you get this already Cobblestone (talk) 08:19, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
I want to edit war with someone who can ban me Limbusfag123 (talk) 08:26, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
like when i was an admin, why do you think edit wars would stop when i showed up with my fancy colored name and changed something in an article, as opposed to some random chud editing it? anything you do as a janny is taken differently, editors can't know when you've suddenly decided to switch back and forth from regular editor mode to janny mode. when i was an admin, if i really wanted to edit war, i would do it logged out. Cobblestone (talk) 08:36, 27 July 2026 (UTC)
Alr i ll make sure that i'll use an alt or otherwise make it unknown for users that janny is edit warring with them. But in my advocacy i can say that there were other jannies edit warring with me so it was fine Gzard (talk)
.png)
