CURRENT MISSION: Conclude the 2026 soyjak.party hack page, aswell as any pages relating to it, such as the Summer 2026 Crisis page.
Update Quotecord with any relevant info. See the blackboard for more info.
Best known for: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{redglow|'''Best known for'''}}}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{redglow|'''Best known for'''}}}} | ||
[[File:Bestknownfor.png|thumb|{{quote|>{{redglow|best known for}}}}]] | [[File:Bestknownfor.png|thumb|{{quote|>{{redglow|best known for}}}}]] | ||
{{ | {{Topaz|content=This page is {{redglow|best known for}} being a '''{{topaztext|topaz}}'''.}} | ||
{{Tip|This page is {{redglow|best known for}} having 48 {{redglow|best known fors}} on this page.}} | |||
{{CustomQuote|STOP REMOVING {{redglow|BEST KNOWN FOR}} FROM OUR PAGES!!! WE ARE {{redglow|BEST KNOWN FOR}} USING THIS PHRASE!!!|file=[[File:cryboywikipetan.png|30px]]}} | |||
'''{{redglow|Best known for}}''' is {{redglow|best known for}} being a spineless weasel phrase {{redglow|best known for}} being the sole anonymous authority that [[Wikipedia]] [[Janny|jannies]] are {{redglow|best known for}} allowing on their site. It is {{redglow|best known for}} being a vague and ambiguous crutch for bad articles. | |||
At the time of writing, there are approximately 142k Wikipedia pages<ref>Using a search engine to search for site:wikipedia.org "{{redglow|best known for}}"</ref> and over 2k pages on this very wiki that are {{Redglow|best known for}} using this cowardly phrase. | |||
== {{redglow|Best known for}} conflicting with rules == | |||
Putting "{{redglow|best known for}}" in an article is {{redglow|best known for}} being against Wikipedia's own rules as per a [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view|NPOV]] and [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions|AWW]]. This is {{redglow|best known for}} becoming comically self-evident when [[you]] read the example list of terms that are {{redglow|best known for}} conflicting with AWW: | |||
Putting "{{redglow|best known for}}" in an article is {{redglow|best known for}} being against Wikipedia's own rules as per a [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view|NPOV]] and [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Words_to_watch#Unsupported_attributions|AWW]]. This is {{redglow|best known for}} becoming comically self-evident when [[you]] read the example list of terms that | |||
* '''''some people say''''' | * '''''some people say''''' | ||
| Line 22: | Line 23: | ||
== {{redglow|Best known for}} IP == | == {{redglow|Best known for}} IP == | ||
{{Gigachad|content=Why yes, the person behind the {{redglow|Best Known For}} IP is {{redglow|best known for}} being a gigachad.}} | {{Gigachad|content=Why yes, the person behind the {{redglow|Best Known For}} IP is {{redglow|best known for}} being a gigachad.|content2=How were you {{redglow|best known for}} telling?}} | ||
''Wikipedia's article (warning: {{redglow|best known for}} being extremely biased): [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP|{{redglow|best known for}} IP]]'' | ''Wikipedia's article (warning: {{redglow|best known for}} being extremely biased): [[wikipedia:Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP|{{redglow|best known for}} IP]]'' | ||
A prominent name in Wikipedia's [[Long-term abuse|list of so-called long-term abuse]] is a hero {{redglow|best known for}} being disparagingly called "{{redglow|best known for}} IP" (BKFIP). This [[Britain|British]] [[gigachad]] is {{redglow|best known for}} removing "{{redglow|best known for}}" in articles for ten years going.<ref name=":0">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP</ref> And unlike other names in their "abuse" list, {{redglow|BKF}}IP isn't {{redglow|best known for}} being a troll. In fact, this is {{redglow|best known for}} being openly stated by the Wikipedia Ministry of Love as the biggest obstacle in its unjust conspiracy to remove him from history:<blockquote>The principal problem with this case is that most edits made by this user are >{{redglow|best known for}} being good-faith edits that are often supported by editors when looked at on their individual merits. This makes issues of conduct {{redglow|best known for}} being harder to enforce.<ref name=":0" /></blockquote>Wikipedia jannies are {{redglow|best known for}} claiming to have given him 3-month IP bans for the crime of removing instances of "{{redglow|best known for}}" in articles.<ref name=":0" /> Why? According to them, his edit summaries are {{redglow|best known for}} being "snarky" | A prominent name in Wikipedia's [[Long-term abuse|list of so-called long-term abuse]] is a hero {{redglow|best known for}} being disparagingly called "{{redglow|best known for}} IP" (BKFIP). This [[Britain|British]] [[gigachad]] is {{redglow|best known for}} removing "{{redglow|best known for}}" in articles for ten years going.<ref name=":0">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP</ref> And unlike other names in their "abuse" list, {{redglow|BKF}}IP isn't {{redglow|best known for}} being a troll. In fact, this is {{redglow|best known for}} being openly stated by the Wikipedia Ministry of Love as the biggest obstacle in its unjust conspiracy to remove him from history:<blockquote>The principal problem with this case is that most edits made by this user are >{{redglow|best known for}} being good-faith edits that are often supported by editors when looked at on their individual merits. This makes issues of conduct {{redglow|best known for}} being harder to enforce.<ref name=":0" /></blockquote>Wikipedia jannies are {{redglow|best known for}} claiming to have given him 3-month IP bans for the crime of removing instances of "{{redglow|best known for}}" in articles.<ref name=":0" /> Why? According to them, his edit summaries are {{redglow|best known for}} being "[[snarky.snappy|snarky]]" As you read through the article, it is {{redglow|best known for}} becoming obvious that the only reason they are persecuting this innocent man and refusing to concede that he is {{redglow|best known for}} being right is {{redglow|best known for}} being due to him being {{redglow|best known for}} his "incivility" and "offensive and aggressive summaries" and "personal attacks in the edit summaries."<ref name=":0" /> Yikesballs. | ||
Comparisons have been made by [[Qa/ (4chan)|/qa/]] users<ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4317834/#4319630</ref><ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4418526</ref><ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4321171/#4321171</ref> between this user and the [[Selfish Little Fuck|Anti-Thougher's]] war on [[Thougher|thoughers]]. | Comparisons have been made by [[Qa/ (4chan)|/qa/]] users<ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4317834/#4319630</ref><ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4418526</ref><ref>https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4321171/#4321171</ref> between this user and the [[Selfish Little Fuck|Anti-Thougher's]] war on [[Thougher|thoughers]]. | ||
== | == {{redglow|Best known for}} seeing also == | ||
*[[Long-term abuse]] | *[[Long-term abuse]] | ||
*[[Though]] | *[[Though]] | ||
| Line 34: | Line 35: | ||
{{Dialect}} | {{Dialect}} | ||
[[Category:Pages that | [[Category:Pages that look like the thing they're about]] | ||
[[Category:Spineless weasel words]] | |||
Latest revision as of 02:12, 25 July 2026
Best known for is best known for being a spineless weasel phrase best known for being the sole anonymous authority that Wikipedia jannies are best known for allowing on their site. It is best known for being a vague and ambiguous crutch for bad articles.
At the time of writing, there are approximately 142k Wikipedia pages[1] and over 2k pages on this very wiki that are best known for using this cowardly phrase.
Best known for conflicting with rules[edit | edit source]
Putting "best known for" in an article is best known for being against Wikipedia's own rules as per a NPOV and AWW. This is best known for becoming comically self-evident when you read the example list of terms that are best known for conflicting with AWW:
- some people say
- it is believed
- many are of the opinion
- most feel
- it is often reported
- it is widely thought
- it is often said
- X has been described as Y
But apparently "best known for" is best known for being A-OK daijoubu...
Best known for IP[edit | edit source]
Wikipedia's article (warning: best known for being extremely biased): best known for IP
A prominent name in Wikipedia's list of so-called long-term abuse is a hero best known for being disparagingly called "best known for IP" (BKFIP). This British gigachad is best known for removing "best known for" in articles for ten years going.[2] And unlike other names in their "abuse" list, BKFIP isn't best known for being a troll. In fact, this is best known for being openly stated by the Wikipedia Ministry of Love as the biggest obstacle in its unjust conspiracy to remove him from history:
The principal problem with this case is that most edits made by this user are >best known for being good-faith edits that are often supported by editors when looked at on their individual merits. This makes issues of conduct best known for being harder to enforce.[2]
Wikipedia jannies are best known for claiming to have given him 3-month IP bans for the crime of removing instances of "best known for" in articles.[2] Why? According to them, his edit summaries are best known for being "snarky" As you read through the article, it is best known for becoming obvious that the only reason they are persecuting this innocent man and refusing to concede that he is best known for being right is best known for being due to him being best known for his "incivility" and "offensive and aggressive summaries" and "personal attacks in the edit summaries."[2] Yikesballs.
Comparisons have been made by /qa/ users[3][4][5] between this user and the Anti-Thougher's war on thoughers.
Best known for seeing also[edit | edit source]
Snopes
- ↑ Using a search engine to search for site:wikipedia.org "best known for"
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Long-term_abuse/Best_known_for_IP
- ↑ https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4317834/#4319630
- ↑ https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4418526
- ↑ https://desuarchive.org/qa/thread/4321171/#4321171
| Best known for is part of a series on |
| Language & Dialect Visit the Soyspeak portal for more. |
|---|
 |
