User talk:SprokemowerMan/1

The 'arty died on my birthday... --SprokemowerMan (talk) 05:33, 15 August 2023 (EST)

OMG IM SO SORRY FOR YOU T~T --Twinker (talk) 05:39, 15 August 2023 (EST)

I fucking hate Sproke

^ Shitskin above me

lawnmower man...

Be careful not to Sproke out!

how do you customise your signature

asking because im intrigued. and sick of my plain ass signature. Thank you! --[[User:Poomageddon|poom]] (talk) 16:44, 28 June 2024 (EST)

User > Preferences > Signature

You can put the CSS directly into the prompt. There is a character limit. It's generous enough to fit my signature, which uses three colors. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 04:05, 29 June 2024 (EST)

cheers and thanks for the info! --poom (talk) 05:28, 29 June 2024 (EST)

Statistics and site rules sections

You said:

"These sections aren't as pointless as you think, jakker"

Copy-pasted statistics and site rules sections are obviously a waste of space. They'll always be an outdated copy of what you could read by visiting the literal front page of the site. Perhaps they're useful if you're a little bitch about visiting the https://theribbitrally.org. I would argue that the list of boards is a waste as well, but sometimes it's used to insert information about the boards that can't be found anywhere else. --Cypherpunks (talk) 10:24, 4 July 2024 (EST)

>[These sections] ... are obviously a waste of space

They are perhaps less important, but I argue that they're not useless. Even if they're a waste of space, the waste is negligible. They're at the bottom of these pages, which is the proper place, and can very easily be ignored. I argue that while most readers won't care, some of them will.

>They'll always be an outdated copy of what you could read by visiting the literal front page of the site.

Could you retrieve the shiny's statistics for me? No, at least not by visiting the front page, because it's down. This is bound to happen to other splinters as time progresses. At that point, it can only be found on an archive... or on here. On that basis alone, the statistics sections aren't useless.

Besides that, there are many tiny sections on the 'ki that are subject to the same argument. For example, the pages for soyjak variants count outdated statistics for how frequently they've appeared on the 'ru. No one has contentions on these sections, because they're small and negligible.

The concluding argument I'll make is that little edit wars have happened based around the shoally's Rules section. This indicated that editors at least care about that, therefore it isn't useless. Hopefully, this all elaborated on my decision to rollback your edits, without becoming a mega essay. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 10:56, 4 July 2024 (EST)

Could you link the edit war you mention the shoally page? I couldn't find it easily. --Cypherpunks (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2024 (EST)

There have been small edit wars and other contentions over the Rules section. [REDACTED]

--SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:58, 4 July 2024 (EST)

I checked all of these, thank you. You disingenuous kike, these are squabbles over the section "Hidden rules that didn't listed on the site", this important, read that again if you need. I've only deleted sections that are copy-pasted, by definition this isn't one of them. It's funny, that the examples you were able to bring up in the attempt to prove that anyone cares about the copy-pasted rules part of the page are actually not about the copy-pasted part disproves your point more effectively than I would care to try.

For the rest, all your arguments are flawed.

Could you retrieve the shiny's statistics for me? No, at least not by visiting the front page, because it's down.

Yes, I could. I could do it on the wiki, the total number of posts is in the infobox.

For example, the pages for soyjak variants count outdated statistics for how frequently they've appeared on the 'ru.

These are, the same as the case above, a tiny bullet point. I never had a problem with this. >No one has contentions on these sections, because they're small and negligible. Why do you continue? The bullet points are not the sections this is about, they're completely unrelated.

They are perhaps less important, but I argue that they're not useless. Even if they're a waste of space, the waste is negligible. They're at the bottom of these pages, which is the proper place, and can very easily be ignored.

So you agree that the sections are useless. It's just that you think they're not harmful. Someone out there may have an odd desire to check the rules not on the real site? As a result, the rest of the users of the Aryan userbase just have to deal with (nearly half of the page height in some cases) being complete noise. The bigger issue is you could justify any kind of trash on the wiki, with this attitude. This kind of wishy-washy, anything-goes attitude can justify anything.

It's a slippery slope for quality to go (even further) down the shitter. The proper place for these sections is the trash can.

I checked all of these, thank you. You disingenuous kike, these are squabbles over the section "Hidden rules that didn't listed on the site"

I'm not a disingenous kike. The sub-section you listed is located inside the Rules section, and it pertains to the rules. It is clearly a part of the Rules. To separate it from such is the greater leap.

>It's funny, that the examples you were able to bring up in the attempt to prove that anyone cares about the copy-pasted rules part of the page are actually not about the copy-pasted part disproves your point more effectively than I would care to try.

What the hell is there to edit war about on a static page such as the rules or the statistics? The point is that there is edit warring adjacent to that, on something less tangible. No one can argue about something that's in plain sight, so there's no way for edit wars to occur on the rules. Requesting for me to find this impossible occurence is nonsensical.

>>They are perhaps less important, but I argue that they're not useless. Even if they're a waste of space, the waste is negligible. They're at the bottom of these pages, which is the proper place, and can very easily be ignored.

>So you agree that the sections are useless. It's just that you think they're not harmful.

No, I don't. I wrote "even if" Even if they're useless, it barely matters. They're not useless, because they provide additional info on the website.

Yes, they're not harmful. When I described the Statistics sections having a negligible amount of waste, I meant that these sections don't take up more than a dozen words and a few lines. Nothing is optimized by cutting such a tiny section that exists at the bottom of a page. That's why this entire thing is a gnat at worst.

(By the way, you cut out the Navboxes on the Shemmy article. Revision 117763) --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 15:17, 4 July 2024 (EST)

First just wanna say that, besides Total Posts (which is already placed in the infobox traditionally) other statistics like Unique Posters are not that valuable and can be misleading. (they only count recent posters)

The sub-section you listed is located inside the Rules section, and it pertains to the rules.

The thing is that I never deleted anything solely because it's about the rules. It's just that copy-pasted text doesn't belong in the wiki. (outside of funny copypastas)

The point is that there is edit warring adjacent to that, on something less tangible.

This point is getting boring to reply to, but, the meaning of a "adjacent" is not the thing itself. You yourself admit they're different in a fundamental way, in saying as edit-warring would be meaningless about one and not the other.

No, I don't. I wrote "even if" Even if they're useless, it barely matters.

From the start you've said that the positive impact of the sections is small, and "even if" it it was negative, the impact would be so near 0 that it doesn't matter. What this screams is that you believe that space on an article could not be used for anything better, not meaningful text or history in that space, not ending the article early with a relevant See Also section. You can just end articles, you know, you don't have to pretend to be informative when you don't actually have anything to write. To give nearly useless, copy-pasted Rules and Statistics text a place is admitting that anything that could be written in that spot would have near 0 impact just as well. If a rule or a statistic was presented when it's relevant, it could be embedded in the article text, but that would require effort, wouldn't it? --Cypherpunks (talk) 16:17, 4 July 2024 (EST)

Clearly, the debate is focused around two subjects - The Rules sections on the Shemmy and Frog Pond articles, and the various Statistics sections distributed across the other splinter pages.

Concerning the Rules sections: Your issue with it is that it's redundant to the actual website. This point is valid.

I gathered from cross-referencing other articles, that there is no convention for including the site's rules. I'll allow it to be removed.

You are also correct that any negative impact from removing the individual Statistics sections is minimal. However, I would like the archive links to stay. I will be adding them to the infoboxes.

Sorry for the hassle. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 16:57, 4 July 2024 (EST)

I think the Unique Posters statistic could be valuable for a dead website as a field in the infobox. The last snapshot of the number gives an indication of how active the site was when it shut down. --Cypherpunks (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2024 (EST)

That's a good idea. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 17:34, 4 July 2024 (EST)

Untitled

Blocked myself award. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 01:59, 11 September 2024 (EST)

congrats on being promoted from janny to admin

we're so fucking back sprokemowerbros — [jackson] [t / c / me / snca] 12:54, 10 November 2024 (EST)

This is so gemmy. Thank you and thanks to Tefal. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 13:05, 10 November 2024 (EST)

Congratulations on getting promoted and getting the Mark of BPR off of you that must've been hard. Gem it up Sproke! --LennonZem (talk) 10:56, 30 November 2024 (EST)

Thanks, dude. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:34, 30 November 2024 (EST)

Why Give Namefags Like Joel Automod?

This will give them an unfair advantage in edit wars, Joel is known for chimping out. It will just help cause drama in general.

I've given Warlock/Joel automod, because throughout the year of him being a user, the majority of his edits are non-inflammatory, and he doesn't seem to participate in edit wars frequently.

Given that fact, he most likely won't cause headaches. If he does break a rule, he can still be banned.

There is also the fact that giving a user automod resets their permissions to the pre-moderation baseline.

I forsee the automod permission being revoked from certain users if they abuse it it. Hopefully, I didn't make a mistake. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 14:27, 10 November 2024 (EST)

soyjak and soyak

i originally intended for Soyjak to be the page on the concept and for Soyak to be on the variant so that there's no plural in the title. and also because they're only two pages so if you link them with a distinguish tip at the top you're still one click away from the other anyways. thoughts? Cobblestone (talk) 11:40, 30 November 2024 (EST)

also, i just checked out the link you added on pages linking to soyjak, and it seems like most of them are linking to soyjak as a concept (for example look at https://soyjakwiki.org/Prophecies) rather than the variants. by having Soyjak be the concept directly (rather than having a disambig there) you wont have to change as many links (only the ones that were actually trying to link to the variant). Cobblestone (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2024 (EST)

You're right, most of the links refer to the concept. I'll move the page.--SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:00, 30 November 2024 (EST)

Sent an email to the address linked to your wiki account

It's fairly important so if you didn't get it or don't have access to that email address anymore let me know. --BananaSplit (talk) 18:05, 19 December 2024 (EST)

I received it and will respond tomorrow. Sorry for the delay. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 22:31, 19 December 2024 (EST)

Thanks, don't apologize for the "delay". I'm used to waiting days for a response whenever I send an email so getting a response in under 24 hours is very fast by my standards. --BananaSplit (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2024 (EST)

Thanks. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:26, 20 December 2024 (EST)

congratulations saar

see above Cobblestone (talk) 10:40, 20 December 2024 (EST)

Thanks. I've read your correspondences with Coalson and Tefal. If you need AllPageEdit again, I'll renew it. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:26, 20 December 2024 (EST)

that would come in handy, sure thing Cobblestone (talk) 11:33, 20 December 2024 (EST)

OH MY FAUCI CONGRATULATIONS KEYEDMOWERMAN — [jackson] [t / c / me / snca] 20:53, 20 December 2024 (EST)

Thanks. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 08:25, 21 December 2024 (EST)

Congrats on being promoted to Head Admin! --Coalson (talk) 22:35, 20 December 2024 (EST)

Thanks. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 08:25, 21 December 2024 (EST)

Do the needful

Can you overwrite File:Soyspeak logo.png with this? https://litter.catbox.moe/7vxycq.png thanks (i would've asked coalson or gem control but it seems only head jannies can overwrite). Cobblestone (talk) 09:56, 21 December 2024 (EST)

Done. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 10:20, 21 December 2024 (EST)

Thanks a bunch. Can you also Template:Science downgrade this template's protections to autoconfirmed? i'd like to edit it. Cobblestone (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2024 (EST)

Done.

Thanks, you can lock it back up now. Cobblestone (talk) 09:10, 22 December 2024 (EST)

jakoglyphics

were you trying to make a script that replaces soyspeak words with jakoglyph images? Cobblestone (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2024 (EST)

Gemmy idea, but not what I was trying to do.

I was trying to fix the #SetLogo line, which was supposed to replace the wiki logo for the Jakoglyphics page (with file:soywikiglyph.png). It broke in a wiki update a while ago. It's a very small loss, that's not really worth anyone's attention. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 19:56, 22 December 2024 (EST)

unlock request

Can you unlock the main page for a short while? Thanks. Cobblestone (talk) 14:14, 23 December 2024 (EST)

Main page should remain protected. I'll just renew your AllPageEdit. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 14:22, 23 December 2024 (EST)

Thanks also can you protect the test article in the guide? Cobblestone (talk) 14:26, 23 December 2024 (EST)

Thanks for the janny, kind stranger!

YWABAG — [jackson] [t / c / me / snca] 11:42, 24 December 2024 (EST)

new toss

can you overwrite https://soyjakwiki.org/File:Soyjak_wiki.png with this https://litter.catbox.moe/v913if.png ? Thanks Cobblestone (talk) 10:02, 25 December 2024 (EST)

New toss

I saw you messing with the logo a few days ago and decided to make this https://litter.catbox.moe/3i5rv8.png, it's a new wiki logo where each puzzle piece has a different variant and it is much higher res too. This leads us to an important question: may one need it? or may they keep it? Cobblestone (talk) 16:26, 26 December 2024 (EST)

I did some searching and I can't find it. They can keep it for now. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:03, 27 December 2024 (EST)

can't find what? Cobblestone (talk) 12:04, 27 December 2024 (EST)

Current main logo's location, because I'm on a normgroid. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:09, 27 December 2024 (EST)

i think only mud can change that through mediawiki backend sorcery. i'll send it to xim Cobblestone (talk) 12:11, 27 December 2024 (EST)

It might be that way. Do try inspect element first, on the logo, and see it isn't a file here. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:14, 27 December 2024 (EST)

you can also change the logo via MediaWiki:Common.css by adding this to it:

.mw-wiki-logo {
    background-size:  135px;
    background-image: url(INSERT LINK TO IMAGE HERE);
}

here's a version that includes the new proposed logo modified for use on the top left

.mw-wiki-logo {
    background-size:  135px;
    background-image: url(images/4/4a/NuLogoModified.png);
}

— [jackson] [t / c / me / snca] 12:27, 27 December 2024 (EST)

by the way, the logo SHOULD be located in the resources/assets folder in the server, and if this does replace the logo internally then the logo HAS to be resized to 135x135px, MediaWiki is weird.

The url didn't heckin' work or something. I did get a litterbox image to work (That Soy Rogan one geg). --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:43, 27 December 2024 (EST)

Also, the current logo seems HD and transparent. I think this was already put into effect. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:45, 27 December 2024 (EST)

It turns out this shiet takes a few minutes to update. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:49, 27 December 2024 (EST)

oh sweet, alTHOUGH i already mailed mud and he'll probably change it from the backend so i'd leave the commons as it is (no logo set there) so that there aren't two logos conflicting or some shieeet Cobblestone (talk) 12:54, 27 December 2024 (EST)

Good idea. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:59, 27 December 2024 (EST)

Swapped out the logo in LocalSettings.php. --BananaSplit (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2024 (EST)

thanks Cobblestone (talk) 08:08, 28 December 2024 (EST)

protections

you must protect all the new dailyjaks and featured gems i scheduled so that the obsessed faggots dont cook our burgers or however the insulin is injected Cobblestone (talk) 10:18, 28 December 2024 (EST)

thanks. dont forget about these guys too https://soyjakwiki.org/Main_Page/Featured_Gem Cobblestone (talk) 11:00, 28 December 2024 (EST)

many thanks. if there was a user rights group that had just (protect) enabled i would've asked for that but there isnt so for now ill be obsessed and ask you/jackson/coalson o algo Cobblestone (talk) 12:07, 28 December 2024 (EST)

the obsessed faggots are burning our library of mcdonalds or something

what do you think of the influx of schlog namefag articles being made? i investigated https://blog.soyjak.st/threads/soyjak-wiki-takeover.12759/page-39#post-450432 i thought we weren't supposed to have namefag articles (manual of style) so are we going to need them or are we going to keep them? Cobblestone (talk) 11:23, 29 December 2024 (EST)

i mean to be fair i initially didn't like this idea, but then i saw Sprokey in the thread just once, not objecting to it and moreso just wondering if everything was factual. from there i just sort of let it happen. i made a schlog template for this occasion and if we need to delete the schlog namefag pages then we will — [t / c / me / snca] 11:35, 29 December 2024 (EST)

I saw that thread. I'm okay with it. They're labeled, too, and they kept the less prominent namefags in the list. I don't like namefags and drama, but the shlog can have a part of this wiki, at least if they don't wage edit wars or spam dust. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:42, 29 December 2024 (EST)

i guess they're 100 times better than booru namestones since all of their articles are literally just X is a random pooner foid and she loves mario kart with no room for countrywar slopdrama Cobblestone (talk) 11:50, 29 December 2024 (EST)

why is a high effort raid getting deleted

Debunking the Reasons Why It Should Be Deleted

SCNA: It’s quite literally a raid that includes 58 people, and two board got completely wiped.

Discord: These days, people will quite literally call anything Discord.

More About Talks, Not the Sharty: Nigga, it’s /DEM/ vs. /BP/ boards on a site called Snarky.Snappy. All he did was record it and guide it.

Self Insert: I do agree that it includes me in the story, but I was literally the commander and the planner for this whole operation. Anyone is free to include their contributions and sides of the story as well.

Actual Reason It Got Deleted: It was because of one of two things—either the janny who pushed for deletion is a furfag who loves anthro, or a lefty soycock who is envious and lied to a janny, false-flagging everything. (im talking about the locking of /bp/ oil spill and the mute on /bp/

I wouldn't do it myself, but everyone else seems to want it deleted. It's also technically a 'cord article (albeit not considered hostile). Also, Gem Control probably isn't a furry. He just hates 'cord stuff a lot, I think.

Also you're breaking some hecking rules by re-creating deleted articles and starting edit wars. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 15:25, 29 December 2024 (EST)

like i said in the list of debunked arguements its not cord i gave proof its not cord in the very page i made if you would please unlock bp/ oil spill as i think its very unconstitutional for a page such as its quality and story to be deleted and the entire freakin footage is recorded with 0 cords in it and cordsontalks is now sontalks since he no longer owns a cord --Hunter (talk) 15:28, 29 December 2024 (EST)

Multiple users called for its deletion, and two different jannies deleted it. Most users are also voting for it to remain deleted.

If it's true that CobsonTalks is no longer in any 'cord, then that objection is weaker. However, everyone still thinks it's SNCA.

I think it's going to remain deleted. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 15:57, 29 December 2024 (EST)

It was only one janny that really deleted it, and the second janny deleted it because of "other people's pressure". I have not yet seen those multiple people—for all I know, it could be GemControl and CobbleGuy. Clearly, everyone gives a shit if they know about how a guy they disliked fully catty wiped Raid 2 boards and 50+ teens contributed in.

2 guys can’t be over 50+ teens and 3 boards. Even if it was 10 people, it’s still shit people care about. N means no one, nigga, not 50+ people and 3 boards https://files.catbox.moe/cdt9et.png <even doe these being alot and mine not is kind hippo crital o algo they can literally ignore this and stop being so leaky about cobsontalks winning this one ngl--Hunter (talk) 16:03, 29 December 2024 (EST)

I didn't do anything. It was deleted the first time by Gem Control because he regarded it as a 'cord war, then it was brought back and people argued for it to be 'nished again because cobsonTALKS is pretty hated by regular /soy/teens right now so they also regarded it as 'cord on 'cord SNCA. The wiki tends to show the consensus of soyteens. Cobblestone (talk) 00:52, 30 December 2024 (EST)

can u link or show them asking for the page to be deleted ive seen /bp/furfags want it deleted and were planning on do smth along the lines of that also dont say the same stuff ive debunked (ask for any proof and ill give it in image form) people will say things they dont know about AND falseflag --Hunter (talk) 01:21, 30 December 2024 (EST)

holy meds. no i can't show it because the page is deleted but off the top of my head the editors were User:Watt, User:1984jak, and User:HWABASFBWC i think or maybe it was User:TNDHWABAG or both. None of those editors are furries. Cobblestone (talk) 01:26, 30 December 2024 (EST)

i have chives of the page i can give it to you to look over its super high quality and it was a 50+ raid that involved 3 boards so i dont see the snca nor cord https://files.catbox.moe/czx2na.txt

just looked thru everything 1 of the accounts dont exists 2 of them were HEAVILY biased and were making the soyvil 5 wiki page which got deleted for being a false flag btw its not about which retard leaks about it its about what happened and something fuckin big happened nigga --Hunter (talk) 01:36, 30 December 2024 (EST)

u also gotta think if its SNCA then why do many fuckin niggas care about it staying up unless they have something against the fur fag bord being wiped or the commie leftie board also being wiped better yet hating on cobsontalks ITS false flags not SNCA nor cord --Hunter (talk) 01:38, 30 December 2024 (EST)

the account was User:1984Jak (missed capitalization on one letter). regardless of whether talks still uses 'cord or not, public opinion of him is at an all time low right now. I remember when you made the page someone put a "two retards fighting" youtube video still with discord logos edited on their faces as the infobox image. that's the idea soyteens seem to have of this raid, and the page didn't reflect that which is why they rejected it. Cobblestone (talk) 01:40, 30 December 2024 (EST)

21:20, 28 December 2024 diff hist +4‎ Talk:Soyvil War 5 yeah its false flag why would they document the /dem/ raid its every single time

>hate talks

>need to attack

>attack the page where he had a raid because you gotta attack everywhere

>false flag

the thing is WE HAVE IT ALL on footage screenshots not only was the raid big and 50 plus people gave a shit about it it was a total victory

--Hunter (talk) 01:44, 30 December 2024 (EST)

Yes, those four different editors are all part of a conspiracy to "falseflag" because they hate talks and not because this entire raid is disregarded on /soy/ as a discord civil war. Cobblestone (talk) 01:52, 30 December 2024 (EST)

ur page got deleted for that very reason why would all those editors contribute to a raid page against /dem/ while rooting for their raid page deletion it was total biases (it isnt a discord civil war we have it all on footage no cord was involved)--Hunter (talk) 01:56, 30 December 2024 (EST)

If all those editors are just biased and soyteens don't actually think this is 'cord drama then why don't you open a thread on /soy/ later during mutt hours and see what they think about this? btw indent your messages with :Cobblestone (talk) 01:59, 30 December 2024 (EST)

first of all /soy/ does is call it cord and quote you with no proof and ill give proof right here

>says its cord

>was not in the raid >did not see the proof >did not see the footage >did not see the page >did not see the screenshots >been proved its false flag >the BRAND NEW raid page created against /dem/ deleted for false flag and all the people involved in its deletion contributed

https://archive.org/details/totally-fun-day watch this before you call anything cord nigga

page chive for the rest of the proof: https://files.catbox.moe/czx2na.txt --Hunter (talk) 02:02, 30 December 2024 (EST)

>first of all /soy/ does is call it cord and quote you with no proof and ill give proof right here >says its cord

Are all of those soyteens also falseflagging then, or do you then admit that soyteens hate this raid and think it's discord drama (regardless of whether you're still using cord or not) Cobblestone (talk) 02:08, 30 December 2024 (EST)

if my memory serves me correctly talks did campaign to invite people over to /dem/ some guy on /leftysoy/ created a raid thread and within a short span the once raid page that was brought back was deleted by the 4 people who created the raid page against talks --Hunter (talk) 02:11, 30 December 2024 (EST)

excues me for my esl btw i needa quickly respond or else the janny might lose attention span and i have to wait longer --Hunter (talk) 02:13, 30 December 2024 (EST)

i won't argue this further then, sproke will bring it back if he wants Cobblestone (talk) 02:14, 30 December 2024 (EST)

thanks transheart --Hunter (talk) 02:18, 30 December 2024 (EST)

I like how respectful you're being about this, but only 2 voters have voted for me to recreate the page, and only 1 has voted for it to be a section on /bp/. This is compared to 8 others have voted for it to remain deleted.

There could've been foul play involved on the poll, but I doubt that possibility, because there are also more users in the older talk pages opposing the article than supporting it, which I expect to be organic o algo. I think the page should remain deleted, for that reason. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 13:34, 30 December 2024 (EST)

What if you let him put a summary of the raid on the article on /dem/ o algx Cobblestone (talk) 13:48, 30 December 2024 (EST)

the raid is too big just to be like that combining everything its an 8 hour stream and a furry response video with a ton of story i made and wins why the hell do niggas care if it stays up blvd is siding with the 8 wrong niggas over the 50+ right ones 2 boards got cattywiped 1 youtube video was made to cope i exposed /bp/ entirely it isnt just some 10 sentence low effort page

dont care what niggas think the page and the raid itself deserve to stay up--Hunter (talk) 15:24, 30 December 2024 (EST)

>fail raids snca stays up >8 hour stream plus another 4 hour stream of raiding and wiping /bp/ and /leftsoy/ while totally exposing /bp/ and their chatlogs 2 wipes 0 losses

>Full wipes are the most successful type of raid and are named as such because they are achieved once you fully or almost fully bump every non-soyjak thread off the catalog. Occasionally, traitorous soyteens will attempt to invalidate a full wipe by bumping an old thread, but those bumps don't count.

WE HAD 2

let me give u a list of equally or worse similar raids https://soyjakwiki.org/The_Sacking_of_/b/ https://soyjakwiki.org/Sturdychan https://soyjakwiki.org/Hawleyjak https://soyjakwiki.org/Omoribot https://soyjakwiki.org/Gigachad-Lennonjak_War https://soyjakwiki.org/Gigachad-Lennonjak_War https://soyjakwiki.org/Hm/ https://soyjakwiki.org/Selene.zawarudo.org https://soyjakwiki.org/Racial_Soygregation

these guys did 1 wipe or 1 partial or it was fail raid we had 2 wipes--Hunter (talk) 15:44, 30 December 2024 (EST)

Foodist on the 'ki

User:Flyfly tried to vandalize Operation Nigger Madness Froot zoot goot leak his IP and rangeban him nowwww Cobblestone (talk) 19:42, 30 December 2024 (EST)

Shiet, I'm so sorry for being late. Glad Quote took care of xim quickly. Make sure to email me next time if this happens again, and thanks. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 20:52, 30 December 2024 (EST)

Geg I forgot your email existed sorry. I didn't think it was that urgent anyways cause he couldn't edit or do anything Cobblestone (talk) 08:31, 31 December 2024 (EST)

also check der latest rejected change by User:XxxanaxxX

Thanks for 'nishing that. one last thing. my allpageedit ran out again and i couldnt edit a dailyjak/featured gem because they're locked. would it be possible to get another extension or is that being too much of a SLF? Cobblestone (talk) 20:15, 31 December 2024 (EST)

Since it was renewed several times, and because of your contributions you can keep it. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 20:21, 31 December 2024 (EST)

Oh my fauci! my countless hours wasted on a bald men wearing glasses and also with a stubble and forehead wrinkles wiki have paid off! thanks Cobblestone (talk) 20:23, 31 December 2024 (EST)

update

I FUCKING KNEW IT THE JANNYS GOT LEAKED NOW UNBAN DER PAGE https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XubqeLp_3cyjw-bK3FQxemSJj-Sct_YjlnSkrdCfJqU/edit?usp=sharing --Hunter (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2024 (EST)

if you read this doc you can realize that all the talks hate and wiki wars have come from a cord set up by the jannys to false flag cobsontalks hate in order to get him nished because they are jealous of the fact that he won the /dem/ elections so they can appoint one of their jannies to be the present of /dem/ --Hunter (talk) 17:17, 1 January 2025 (EST)

I did read it, and it doesn't look like a wiki problem. I also read the recent changes and it says that you're spamming everyone's talk page. You need to take a break, dude. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 17:48, 1 January 2025 (EST)

man im just trying to make a fun raid page and the cord who hates talks have admitted they want him gone so they can elect their own people i doubt anyone would be obsessed about talks like that for no reason

all in all they are biased and liars who false flag for their own benefit if you cant see that i'd have to guess your also with them. --Hunter (talk) 19:11, 1 January 2025 (EST)

move request

can you move Slopjaks to Slopjak? i'd move it because the plural is making me leak and i cant do it since requires deletion (more than one edit in redirect = cant overwrite) also Soy duel to Soyduel because no one says soy duel they say soyduel. Cobblestone (talk) 13:03, 2 January 2025 (EST)

just a little something

look at the latest 2 named edits i rejected to the nufroot page. identical vandalism made by different accounts. probably nothing needs to be done for now but just something to keep in mind for the future, it might become relevant Cobblestone (talk) 21:47, 4 January 2025 (EST)

I nosed around before this. Check the banish log. 6 sock puppets. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 21:49, 4 January 2025 (EST)

thought so. thanks. Cobblestone (talk) 21:53, 4 January 2025 (EST)

I don't like being slandered. I'm not associated with this user, nor are any wiki jannies associated with this.

But if that's the case, why isn't the BP oil spill page added back? Why am I still banned from the Cobsontalks page or the /BP/ page? Explain that. (I've given 100s of reasons, and yet you side with the known janny false flaggers—and yet you say you're not associated.)

Also, EVERYONE fucking knows this, btw. You cannot tell me that anyone besides the jannies we exposed are this obsessed about TALKS hard enough to want any page about him either to slander him or to be deleted—and anyone who is even slightly in support of him to be banned. --Hunter (talk) 00:38, 5 January 2025 (EST)

As I've said, I don't believe that Jackson or Gem Control are in this 'cord, and I'm definitely not in it.

The sock puppet user didn't have any ties to anyone on this wiki, except for the banned red name accounts. I checked this. Don't say I uprooted my own accounts, or one of the wiki jannies'. Beyond the red names, it's a dead end.

I haven't picked a side on this, because the situation is grey. Talk of nufrootcord allowed on /q/ and the schlog, therefore it's allowed on here. However, you're walking a thin line, due to the chaos that your page is bringing to the wiki. If I lock it down, that's going to be the reason.

/bp/ Oil Spill remains deleted, because the majority of soyteens deem it SNCA. I know that it's not 'cord, but it's still SNCA. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 01:05, 5 January 2025 (EST)

still saying the same damn points like i told you 4 times already frootcord saying its SNCA still cant beat the 58+ people not the mention 3 boards involved 1 board being catty wiped warrants its own page much less 2.

not to mention that WHO cares if 8 people (a ping in jannycord) said its snca 58+ people and 3 boards 500+ pph raid nigga please --Hunter (talk) 01:20, 5 January 2025 (EST)

also why would 10+ people be in a discussion page so quickly out of nowhere like nigga use ya brain for once and see that no one cares about its deletion besides the people the OPPOSE talks aka the jannies https://docs.google.com/document/d/1XubqeLp_3cyjw-bK3FQxemSJj-Sct_YjlnSkrdCfJqU/edit?tab=t.0 --Hunter (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2025 (EST)

saar

can you do the needful and add this to commons.css?

@font-face {

 font-family: "Cloister Black";
 src: url("https://archive.encyclopediadramatica.vg/CloisterBlack.ttf") format("tff");

}

thanks Cobblestone (talk) 21:44, 5 January 2025 (EST)

this is an optional font you're using for soyliterature, yes? -SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 21:54, 5 January 2025 (EST)

yes Cobblestone (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2025 (EST)

did it work? -SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page

no for some reason. look in Portal:Soyliture. ill try some stuff

I did some debugging. There's nothing wrong with what you put on soyliterature, since other fonts work. Even the link works when I open it, but maybe the wiki doesn't like it. Maybe installing the font here would fix the issue, but I don't know how. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 22:25, 5 January 2025 (EST)

yea idk i tried defining the body as that font in a css file and including it into the article but that didnt work either Cobblestone (talk) 22:35, 5 January 2025 (EST)

i'll ask jackson since he uploaded it

i had him upload an otf file this time https://archive.encyclopediadramatica.vg/Unrelated/CloisterBlack.otf maybe try switching this one out. be careful of the format = "tff" bit you'll have to change that Cobblestone (talk) 23:00, 5 January 2025 (EST)

still not working sadly but thanks for trying. you can revert the css now Cobblestone (talk) 23:12, 5 January 2025 (EST)

Alright. Maybe you can do it temu-style and use a unicore font, such as this Fancy Text Generator --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 23:17, 5 January 2025 (EST)

did the trick. thanks Cobblestone (talk) 23:23, 5 January 2025 (EST)

edit warring

there's edit warring going on and the contestants are leaking in my talkpage o algo go look at it that or Portuguese-Islamic War - Cobblestone (talk) 12:19, 6 January 2025 (EST)

That edit war has been going on for a while. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 19:01, 6 January 2025 (EST)

overwrite request

saar https://litter.catbox.moe/qh4cot.png https://soyjakwiki.org/File:Coffee_Lover.png also i think you should give the joons overwrite privileges if that's possible. thanks Cobblestone (talk) 13:49, 8 January 2025 (EST)

Done.

>give the joons overwrite privileges

I'm afraid that requires going "under the hood" which I can't do. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 17:53, 8 January 2025 (EST)

all quote has to do is just add this to localsettings.php for us to overwrite files:

$wgGroupPermissions['helper']['reupload'] = true;

— [t / c / me / snca] 18:05, 8 January 2025 (EST)

thanks, i mailed him (i also asked him to add it to allpageedit usergroup too because im a slf who uses it often) Cobblestone (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2025 (EST)

Bu5t Screencap

The Discord link in the screencap has since expired. Can you please restore the image?--MoonMetropolis (talk) 21:11, 9 January 2025 (EST)

It might've, but I'm against its inclusion anyway, as a principle. I don't see benefit in presenting a naked 'cord link, even if it's expired. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 21:22, 9 January 2025 (EST)

could censor it with a black bar Cobblestone (talk) 21:41, 9 January 2025 (EST)

sidebar is outdated

sidebar needs these fixed:

• booru and happening links are double redirects.
• the "Wiki Portal" links to the old portal. i think changing it to "wiki portals" would be better - Category:Portals Cobblestone (talk) 04:04, 11 January 2025 (EST)

I've corrected the booru and happening links.

I'm planning on Portals getting some sort of correction, however I haven't decided yet. Perhaps include your portals into the old one? I don't want to link to a category. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 06:22, 11 January 2025 (EST)

there's this Main Page/Portals Cobblestone (talk) 07:34, 11 January 2025 (EST)

locked

i removed the text from the lockedboard template in Great Purge because most of the users got unbanned after so it wasnt accurate. doesnt really matter just letting you know my rationale since you said marge Cobblestone (talk) 08:44, 14 January 2025 (EST)

No problem. I merely want it to be plural, mostly. The second part isn't as important, but I like the hyperbole of it. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 14:52, 14 January 2025 (EST)

i see. also i scheduled a number of dailyjaks and featured gems so you probably want to protect those (or you jackson if you see this first) Cobblestone (talk) 06:48, 15 January 2025 (EST)

actually i'm gonna email mud because i wanted to ask him about automatic admin protection on all subpages. cascading didnt work for some reason Cobblestone (talk) 07:13, 15 January 2025 (EST)

Cascading works for templates... Maybe we could move the dailyjaks into that namespace. This is speculation, but maybe we can make a Dailyjak namespace that works very similarly. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 07:17, 15 January 2025 (EST)

You have to transclude the dailyjak pages for cascading protection to work. -SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page

ainnoway we're going to have a monstrosity of a page where every single dailyjak and featured gem is transcluded. i think there should be a smarter way to handle this so let's see what mud says it could be good Cobblestone (talk) 07:30, 15 January 2025 (EST)

We can have a <nowiki> tagged page that transcludes this monstrosity, then gets transcluded without an impact on the main dailyjak page. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 07:33, 15 January 2025 (EST)

wouldn't you still have to add new dailyjaks and such to that page manually THOUGH? my idea with this is to remove the need to have admins autoconfirm/admin protect pages manually every time Cobblestone (talk) 07:37, 15 January 2025 (EST)

My idea would make mass protection more efficient, but maybe this can be automated by a script or something. It depends on what you want. Either way, it seems that dailyjaks will have to be suggested on another page for non-AllPageEdit soyteens. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 07:43, 15 January 2025 (EST)

well let's pursue that route if there are no alternatives i guess. so that the obsessed faggots dont fry our unprotected dailyjaks Cobblestone (talk) 08:04, 15 January 2025 (EST)

why can i move wiki pages

what retard gave a literal who janny powers meds

That's because you're an autoconfirmed user. The wiki automatically gives you this when you've made enough edits and your account is old enough. Congratulations. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 15:00, 17 January 2025 (EST)

supp

jackson probably contacted you about this: User_talk:Jackson#ting_ting but i also think it would be a good idea to give the joons suppressor perms. i think you can do this right away too unlike image overwrite since there's a user group defined Cobblestone (talk) 04:28, 18 January 2025 (EST)

Done. I've considered handing out promotions. Helpers as a group won't get suppressor perms, because... they shouldn't, ok? --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:07, 18 January 2025 (EST)

alright, you're the boss. Cobblestone (talk) 12:07, 18 January 2025 (EST)

hello

read email GapeNewell (talk) 18:09, 20 January 2025 (EST)

It's been dealt with, as requested. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 19:04, 20 January 2025 (EST)

?

WTF is this shit?--MoonMetropolis (talk) 00:01, 21 January 2025 (EST)

Stand down. Stop resisting. Stop investigating. Cobblestone (talk) 00:03, 21 January 2025 (EST)

George W Bush and Haram.

Since we have The Happy Merchant for the Not Kosher category, should we add Tetojak for the Haram category (for more gegs ofcourse)? Also, I know I stated this on the Keyed retard discussion, but since Bush Jr. was mentioned on the Obama page, should the Keyed Retard page have an infobox on him, make a separate page about him, or keep the page as it is? Spectator1 (talk) 20:09, 21 January 2025 (EST)

I like the proposal of adding Tetojak to the Haram template.

George Bush isn't remotely related to soyjaks or soy culture. A page on him shouldn't be made, in my opinion. On the keyed retard page, an infobox on him would be straying from the topic. I'd keep the page as is. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 21:30, 21 January 2025 (EST)

Agreed for both, albeit, the only reason why I suggested that for Bush Jr. is because of continuity, like how Joe Biden's predecessor leads to Donald Trump in the Biden article. Also, do I make a new subsection for a new suggestion? Spectator1 (talk) 20:07, 23 January 2025 (EST)

Every section is like a thread. There's no reason to add a subsection. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 22:13, 23 January 2025 (EST)

Sorry, meant to say section instead of subsection Spectator1 (talk) 18:05, 25 January 2025 (EST)

request

can you remove my name color? it was funny but i think its a bad precedent to clutter the recent changes by highlighting random niggers. it should only be functional not decorative so nusois know who to talk to when a joon's help is needed Cobblestone (talk) 07:58, 24 January 2025 (EST)

documentation

i was trying to add documentation to templates so i started with Template:God and it's broken. any idea why? Cobblestone (talk) 03:14, 27 January 2025 (EST)

All I know is that the error is from Line 63 of Module:Effective_protection_level. If my memory is correct, this same line breaks plenty of other stuff. Unfortunately, I can't fix it.

I've considered removing the module, but if I do, then hell might break loose (on the 'ki).

On the other hand, it was added in 2023. There's a chance that the module is useless, but it doesn't quite outweigh the risk. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 03:26, 27 January 2025 (EST)

i dealt with it Cobblestone (talk) 05:00, 27 January 2025 (EST)

Good job. Take this award:

"Thought outside the box" Award

--SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 05:20, 27 January 2025 (EST)

thanks also uhhh can you protect the new featured gems i scheduled thanks Cobblestone (talk) 11:46, 27 January 2025 (EST)

URLs

instead of redirecting to access denied i think you should delete it and protect it from creation. also do the same to the jassy cause it's not protected Cobblestone (talk) 05:37, 31 January 2025 (EST)

it's alright. don't wanna create red links --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 05:56, 31 January 2025 (EST)

i see. alright i scrubbed the rest of the URLs out of der 'ki. Cobblestone (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2025 (EST)

oops i missed some in happenings/2024. read the latest revision there for more info Cobblestone (talk) 06:12, 31 January 2025 (EST)

saar

scheduled a whole bunch of dailyjaks until the end of the month. will sit back and let people add what they want for now and if no one adds anything ill do it again. can you protect xem o algo? thanks Cobblestone (talk) 05:17, 2 February 2025 (EST)

I'm gonna do that whole cascade protection thing soon, to make this easier, since the plan with Mud doing something fell through. Btw did he really quit the Soysphere or just the schlog? --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 05:41, 2 February 2025 (EST)

Xe seems to be really gone because he hasn't responded to my emails. Cobblestone (talk) 05:42, 2 February 2025 (EST)

i see you've implemented it, one question THOUGH: wont jannies have to manually add pages to the index as they're created? i guess you could transclude all days of a month in advance but then autoconfirmed nusoitoblerones wont be able to add stuff Cobblestone (talk) 06:23, 2 February 2025 (EST)

Yes, it's manual, but it's way easier to add text than to visit every individual page to protect. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 06:45, 2 February 2025 (EST)

okay i see. i don't know what the protect interface looks like so i guess you're right. i thought i would be able to edit the indices after scheduling dailyjaks so i could protect them myself but it appears cascade is higher than even allpageedit. Cobblestone (talk) 07:05, 2 February 2025 (EST)

i just remembered. you xhould implement the index thing for the Main Page/Featured Gem too please thanks o algo Cobblestone (talk) 12:59, 2 February 2025 (EST)

approve queue

was worried about embedded + 0 contribs acc so i left it for you to decide just in case Cobblestone (talk) 07:44, 6 February 2025 (EST)

also can you uhhh substitute this dailyjak for me? i couldnt because of the cascade protection Main_Page/The_Dailyjak/February_11,_2025 File:CIAmoon.jpg felt like it's not gemmy enough. Cobblestone (talk) 09:14, 6 February 2025 (EST)

thanks a lot. sorry to bother you again but can you substitute this too? i recently found out that it was made by a pedophile. Main Page/The Dailyjak/February 16, 2025 i uploaded this if you dont have anything to feature at hand File:100224 - SoyBooru.png Cobblestone (talk) 16:28, 7 February 2025 (EST)

I made an IRC channel for the 'ki

#wiki, join it so I can give you perms. GapeNewell (talk) 10:16, 9 February 2025 (EST)

I just said

>irc sucks
>irc is coal
>irc is brimstone
>irc is dust
>i hate irc

--SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 10:30, 9 February 2025 (EST)

Untitled

Bring back the Isreal perspective for warrior z you selfish little fuck — Preceding unsigned comment added by MackyKacky (talk • contribs)

No thanks. There were too many perspectives, and the drama is coal. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 16:37, 9 February 2025 (EST)

whole bunch of shit in the queue

i dont know what all of this is about since we dont have an article on it, and it reeks of snca foodist 'cord drama so i left it up to you Cobblestone (talk) 12:28, 10 February 2025 (EST)

Xe uploaded the context after. don't know how legit this is but you might want to look into this. Tamers12345#Ruben_Guzman_AKA_Carlos834 Cobblestone (talk) 13:02, 10 February 2025 (EST)

approved this shit by accident (missclick), reverting everything - jackson (wtf my signature broke the talk page)

i think it's still worth looking into. since this alleged pedophile is on the 'ki too. sproke when you wake up check the revisions of that page i linked and the talk page of the editor that added that section User:dixie, also the revisions of this (specifically the first one). images were deleted but i think you can get them back -> User:SpateHicks Cobblestone (talk) 13:11, 10 February 2025 (EST)

side quest (oh my video games): foodist edit rejected just now. rape his ip and leak it Cobblestone (talk) 18:02, 10 February 2025 (EST)

the chud who tried to add the scully article? don't think xe's a foodist --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 18:05, 10 February 2025 (EST)

read the article closer, he literally admits to watching 'p at the end (and the article as a whole reeks of """irony""" + no 'teen calls kids "lolis") Cobblestone (talk) 18:08, 10 February 2025 (EST)

thank you. i just sent you an email about a different inquiry Cobblestone (talk) 18:26, 10 February 2025 (EST)

oh my fauci thanks for promoting me. my first order of business is that i want to rename some pages that have plural names like Trannies per the manual of style (like 'kipedia does it) is that okay or will CERN steal the revisions like with slopjaks? Cobblestone (talk) 07:40, 11 February 2025 (EST)

If you want to avoid the chance of another CERN incident, then then you should ignore the "delete to make way" prompt and manually delete the target page, before moving. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 08:43, 11 February 2025 (EST)

i tested it first on a smaller article. it's seemingly fine Cobblestone (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2025 (EST)

xir i think common.css needs the User: bit to work Cobblestone (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2025 (EST)

Marked

I marked the page on Carlos834 for deletion after talking to User:9a0c and User:Dixie. it turned out to be a nothingburger and there's no proof carlos is a pedo or groomer or anything so this is just an accusatory page on an otherwise innocent guy. revert if you disagree. Cobblestone (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2025 (EST)

Dailyjak

I see you've made some changes to the dailyjak. What's the dailyjak namespace? Does it auto-protect or something? Also if it's in a different namespace entirely why is it still a subpage of main page? Why not just have it be Dailyjak:The Dailyjak/MONTH DAY, YEAR? Finally, what about the Main_Page/Featured_Gem? If you need me to I'll go move all the stuff there to an appropriate namespace too. Cobblestone (talk) 03:53, 18 February 2025 (EST)

I don't think it auto-protects. It's still very helpful for the wiki.

I didn't change their name, because it's the easiest move: just a dropdown menu compared to changing text for every dailyjak. The double effort required isn't worth it.

I requested the namespace from quote, because all those pages took up the (Main) namespace, and thus cluttered some of the wiki features (Special:Random, Special:AllPages, etc.). This, of course, compounds over time. You can still observe Featured Gem articles doing this.

As for Featured Gems, I might request that namespace from quote soon, since there's a similar issue with them and (Main).

Also, you can't just add a prefix. It needs to be recognized by the wiki. So, there's no Featured Gem: prefix yet. They're definitely going to be on the chopping block.

If the Featured Gem: prefix gets added and you want to deal with that, the effort will definitely be appreciated. Just make sure to uncheck the leave redirect box if Helpers can do that, because leaving hundreds of redirects is inefficient. Then, change the base page links using a crafty CTRL+H in a text editor. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 05:13, 18 February 2025 (EST)

i'll deal with it. just let me know when the namespace becomes a thing Cobblestone (talk) 05:31, 18 February 2025 (EST)

also it would be nice if you or mud could enable visual editor on the dailyjak namespace. it's annoying to have to go to another page to upload the image Cobblestone (talk) 17:04, 18 February 2025 (EST)

That's unfortunate, but a small price to pay. The source editor isn't complicated to use.

You should familiarize yourself with the source editor, and it won't be a problem.

If you're insistent, then we can ask quote in a few days or so, God willing. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 22:06, 18 February 2025 (EST)

i obviously do know how to use the source editor. the Category:Portals i created were made using the source editor. what i meant was that you need the visual editor to drag and drop files to upload to use as a dailyjak Cobblestone (talk) 02:46, 19 February 2025 (EST)

speaking of which... why are all of the fucking portals deleted? Cobblestone (talk) 02:48, 19 February 2025 (EST)

resolved. it seems that the new "portal:" namespace was hiding all of the pages. i talked to mud and he got rid of it and now they're back. i'll deal with the featured gems now (i also asked him to enable the visual editor on dailyjaks while im at it) Cobblestone (talk) 03:20, 19 February 2025 (EST)

featured gems dealt with. i had to go back and delete all the redirects manually because helpers dont have that option apparently but that should be all of them Cobblestone (talk) 04:30, 19 February 2025 (EST)

crashed out

>crashed out

can you do the thing here

GapeNewell (talk) 14:15, 28 February 2025 (EST)

i did it nvm jackson got to it first Cobblestone (talk) 14:19, 28 February 2025 (EST)

Both of you are insanely quick. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 15:21, 28 February 2025 (EST)

policy

we should also have a policy page for approvers. i was going to write one and have the general gist to be allow all good-faith edits that don't break rules, even if they're biased or you (the approver) heavily disagree, but i realized you might not agree so i left it up to you Cobblestone (talk) 16:32, 2 March 2025 (EST)

Good idea. Maybe a separate article called Soyjak Wiki:Approver Policy. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 16:59, 2 March 2025 (EST)

149.28.197.136 vandalized the UTTP page

ban xim for being a foodistpedonigger GapeNewell (talk) 21:46, 2 March 2025 (EST)

featured gems

featured gems are still showing up in random page. i moved them all to the Featured Gem: namespace using the dropdown but somehow they're still main Cobblestone (talk) 04:57, 4 March 2025 (EST)

That's because they're content pages. That's how you get the visual editor on them. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 10:32, 4 March 2025 (EST)

then how come dailyjaks have the visual editor but dont show up in random? Cobblestone (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2025 (EST)

No idea. I wrongly assumed both popped up when they both got visual editor.

My content page hypothesis might still be correct to a degree, but I can't see the code, so I have no clue.

On another note:

The talk pages also have an issue that they can be visited initially, but can somehow get treated as if they get a talk page, creating a Talk:Dailyjak talk: abomination geg.

After investigating, I found that the reason is because Dailyjak talk: has an ID of "0" when the ID should be "3001" because Dailyjak is "3000". [1]

Also, Featured Gem: namespace has an ID of 0 for some reason...

So, maybe these problems are related. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:09, 4 March 2025 (EST)

it's probably a backend issue muddy mud has to deal with then Cobblestone (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2025 (EST)

'ki needs 'pprovers during eurohours

the approval queue is full during eurohours GapeNewell (talk) 09:16, 13 March 2025 (EST)

Very few are online during euro hours. I'll try to datamine and recruit o algo. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 15:23, 13 March 2025 (EST)

CERN incident

this time with Soyjak.blog Namefags/Jackson -> Jackson even though i deleted the redirect Jackson first manually Cobblestone (talk) 15:47, 15 March 2025 (EST)

the affy page

there's an image of the owner's twp. shouldn't we censor it because needless nsfw? i can do it but you'll need to suppress the previous image. also what about archiving the page under admin protection since it's all over at this point Cobblestone (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2025 (EST)

Tama

For better or worse, Tama has been an influential part of the Soysphere. You should ask Doll to just let the page be merged with the Shemmy page rather than delete it - Editor (talk) 18:52, 15 March 2025 (EST)

Okay. The frooty glowop has gone too far or something. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 18:47, 16 March 2025 (EST)

connection issues o algo

recently my edits take a raisin ton of time to get processed or something and 90% of the time they get an error and ill have to click retry and gamble again to publish my edits

also sometimes instead i get this clownflare gateway timeout thing which causes my whole edit to be gone — Preceding unsigned comment added by de stalin (talk • contribs)

Everyone's experiencing this right now. There's nothing I can do, because it's server related. I'm sure it's being resolved right now. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 18:49, 21 March 2025 (EST)

thingy

do you think it would be possible to allow jannies to move pages without leaving a redirect? i want to rename all the protection indices to include the year since we can't just keep using the same pages in 2026. Cobblestone (talk) 09:07, 28 March 2025 (EST)

I'll do it. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 09:20, 28 March 2025 (EST)

thanks Cobblestone (talk) 09:20, 28 March 2025 (EST)

templates

I've been thinking of redesigning all header templates so that they're all at 100% page width. Thoughts? Cobblestone (talk) 06:30, 29 March 2025 (EST)

actually this wouldnt look good plus it wouldnt be practical on some templates with special CSS so nvm Cobblestone (talk) 06:30, 29 March 2025 (EST)

Question

Hello. I would to ask if it's possible to have suppressor. I often need to use it for stuff like this User_talk:Jackson#suppress although it's not super crucial since i can just keep asking you or jackson to do it but it would be handy. i also understand if you say no because it's not good to vest too much power in a single individual Cobblestone (talk) 01:51, 31 March 2025 (EST)

You can have suppressor since it isn't too big of a leap. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 16:41, 31 March 2025 (EST)

thanks. also gemmy event Cobblestone (talk) 00:15, 1 April 2025 (EST)

ack

Should we ack Template:Gold? it's like Ruby but even more of a dead unused nigger without a niche Cobblestone (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2025 (EST)

Yeah it lacks a use case. Since it's included in 17 pages I'll redirect it to ruby. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 09:48, 2 April 2025 (EST)

PLS bring back the Warrior z isreali perspective Page

it was a gemerald i need it back--TherealSlopCHAD (talk) 14:16, 9 April 2025 (EST)--TherealSlopCHAD (talk) 14:16, 9 April 2025 (EST)--TherealSlopCHAD (talk) 14:16, 9 April 2025 (EST)--TherealSlopCHAD (talk) 14:16, 9 April 2025 (EST)--TherealSlopCHAD (talk) 14:16, 9 April 2025 (EST)

i can archive the wikitext but we are NOT bringing this article back blud — jackson (wtf wikitext broke)

Yeah it's not coming back. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 17:09, 9 April 2025 (EST)

ESL

i misread Soyjak Wiki:Rules/Boxed template as "meaning it take" instead of "making it take" and "fixed it", making it ESL geg sorry Cobblestone (talk) 07:55, 14 April 2025 (EST)

also, small question: do we redirect variant:unknown pages or keep them? Cobblestone (talk) 12:15, 14 April 2025 (EST)

If it's dust then redirect. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 16:11, 14 April 2025 (EST)

collapsible

doesn't seem to work on site notice, how about you just ack the template question bit and bold the notice for now? Cobblestone (talk) 06:54, 15 April 2025 (EST)

back again with this

its pretty much known now by all that the pages deletion was a false-flag and the janny who first banned the page is now banned User:Gem_Control so i please once more ask for you to add the oil spill page back since i worked real hard on it --Hunter (talk) 02:45, 18 April 2025 (EST)

Not showing up?

It's supposed to look like this https://litter.catbox.moe/jgr2bf.jpg Cobblestone (talk) 12:46, 20 April 2025 (EST)

also make sure to clear cache with ctrl shift r or previewing source again Cobblestone (talk) 13:17, 20 April 2025 (EST)

It won't load. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 14:08, 20 April 2025 (EST)

Can you give me admin for 1 day? I think I can get it working. Cobblestone (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2025 (EST)

Too much of a security risk probably. Jackson's edit looks good either way so maybe look into that. Cobblestone (talk) 23:36, 20 April 2025 (EST)

Undelete pages from BB Ghast and Ribbon

9a0c has been deleting pages from schlog namefags after it has been sold. That is fine, but neither of those two are namefags from there and just happened to use the site. Pink Chud is from the sharty and BB Ghast is from the booru and both are only relevant because of those places, so their pages should be kept. - Editor (talk) 26 April 2025

Jimbo page

Hi, could you please restore the Jimbo page? he was deleted for schloggery but hes also notable in /qa/, so i dont think the article on him should have been deleted. — JACKSON'S SIGNATURE WAS RAPING THE PAGE SO FIXED

Response

Undeleted Jimbo because xe is a very notable Schlog user. Undeleted Ribbon and B B Ghast because they don't have a Schoog origin. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 15:27, 27 April 2025 (EST)

What's the path to become a wiki approver

I realised I'm somehow in the top 5 for most contributions on this site, so I was wondering what've got to do to become an approver and eventually a janitor since I've got so many time here. - Editor (talk) 28 April 2025

Get nooticed or just ask. If your contributions are good, you can get promoted. I'll give approver and rollback. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 14:22, 28 April 2025 (EST)

Question

Can you block Warrior-Z from editing his own page? He only edits it to make him look better Cobsonant (talk) 11:56, 2 May 2025 (EST)

He hasn't acted egregiously, so I won't block him from his page.

There's an agreement that there wouldn't be multiple perspective pages, because there used to be 7. The current page is "neutral" which is minimal praise and minimal criticism. Warrior-Z is probably acting under that precept. I admit that he's probably striking out every criticism, therefore I'm reverting his most recent revision. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 13:31, 2 May 2025 (EST)

Alright thanks for the answer Cobsonant (talk) 13:34, 2 May 2025 (EST)

Can you make it

Can you make it so that jannies are called helpers again? It's hecking 'ki culture. Cobblestone (talk) 18:20, 3 May 2025 (EST)

soot do this Rover (talk) 18:42, 3 May 2025 (EST)

also quote seemingly promoted some random niggers (sharty staff) into wiki jannies. you should highlight their names. Cobblestone (talk) 09:06, 4 May 2025 (EST)

undelete

could you undelete Liam xhe had nothing to do with the schlog

New

You'll want to give User:Editor and the new jannies the janny barnstar sticker thing at the end of their names that Jackson introduced. Although you can also just ack the whole thing since it's kind of redundant/on the nose. Cobblestone (talk) 17:14, 6 May 2025 (EST)

ermmm you forgot to give editor xis color and badge Cobblestone (talk) 12:06, 11 May 2025 (EST)

^ bumo since it looks like you missed this while checking the page. Cobblestone (talk) 13:12, 11 May 2025 (EST)

Undelete Tama page?

9a0c will probably stop trying to censor and defend tama after her creator got exposed as a massive gooner. Plus Doll is not even a janny anymore. This whole debacle also made it worth Tama having her own page anyway, what do you think?

9a0c is probably going to delete it again for whatever reason. As to what I should do, fighting to keep a page on a splinter's goonslop mascot is not a good hill to die on. It probably doesn't really deserve a page any more than Svvt would. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 04:51, 10 May 2025 (EST)

Actually, I sent Quote an email about this just an hour or so ago, so let's see. Cobblestone (talk) 04:54, 10 May 2025 (EST)

no response. maybe the frooty handover is just a larp so the pages are still banned under frooty mandate. Cobblestone (talk) 18:49, 13 May 2025 (EST)

Hey SprokemowerMan can I become a Janny?

Wanna make sure pages arent vandalised nor shat up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by cobbyfisheye (talk • contribs)

(USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)

For now you can get rollback and approver. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 10:58, 11 May 2025 (EST)

You have had an account for a very long time but haven't really been consistently an active contributor for long periods of time, keep editing and wait for a spot to open. Obviously this is my opinion only. Rover (talk) 06:16, 11 May 2025 (EST)

How do I get auto confirmed?

Sometimes I don’t like to wait for my edits to get approved so I’m curious how I can get it auto confirmed. Do I need a number of edits or what?

The limit is really high. Too high tbh. The easier way is to get autoapproved. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:39, 11 May 2025 (EST)

how do I do that then --Cobchud (talk) 11:48, 11 May 2025 (EST)

Somebody has to give it. I just requested a change to the moderation and you meet my proposed requirements so I'll give you autoapproved. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 12:42, 11 May 2025 (EST)

SprokemowerMan/1 is ARYAN btw, if that matters

spade hicks

undelete and merge carlos834 (if it even had any relevant info) with spatehicks CoblonDisciple (talk) 03:30, 14 May 2025 (EST)

Last time I dealt with the article the info was unreliable, which is why it got deleted. I think the current iteration is good enough. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 13:52, 15 May 2025 (EST)

rollbacker policy

might be worth adding CoblonDisciple (talk) 04:23, 14 May 2025 (EST)

Rollback is too simple. The article would have redundant info. Just don't break the general rules. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 13:41, 15 May 2025 (EST)

>redundant info nobody actually knows when to rollback a page, and most of the time it's just seen as a quicker way to undo the edits of a page, when it is supposed to be a moderation action.

>you rollback vandalism, obviously Which is what should be written in Soyjak Wiki:Policy. also i suggest merging approver policy and rollback with policy since its better to have everything about moderation in 1 article CoblonDisciple (talk) 14:04, 15 May 2025 (EST)

autoconfirmed status requirements

Hello kind saar can you please give me back my autoconfirmed status? Nivea Man (talk) 01:30, 15 May 2025 (EST)

The requirements were shifted. I can't give autoconfirmed. You're close to getting it back. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 13:41, 15 May 2025 (EST)

Meds what are the new requirements? They didn't written in Soyjak Wiki:Moderation --Nivea Man (talk) 13:42, 16 May 2025 (EST)

I just added them. It's 50 edits over 14 days. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 20:16, 16 May 2025 (EST)

More suppression

Suppress these logs for similar reasons as to what I've detailed in my email. https://soyjakwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=98290 https://soyjakwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=98291 https://soyjakwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=98292 Cobblestone (talk) 03:27, 16 May 2025 (EST)

mi again

and btw what happened to the 🍹Frooty template? --Nivea Man (talk) 13:47, 16 May 2025 (EST)

got replaced with Template:FDL Cobblestone (talk) 18:22, 16 May 2025 (EST)

nuTemplate

can you put template:CIATip in Soyjak Wiki:template? --Broot (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2025 (EST)

done Cobblestone (talk) 19:16, 16 May 2025 (EST)

thanks --Broot (talk) 19:16, 16 May 2025 (EST)

Betaetadelota

Can you reinstate this? He was doxed by the sharty so no reason to delete. Cobblestone (talk) 23:04, 16 May 2025 (EST)

I also need this file File:Grok.png Cobblestone (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2025 (EST)

Hey.

Respond to the e-mail i sent you. Thanks. Rover (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2025 (EST)

I apologize for neglecting it. It got lost in my mind between a few other emails. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 15:04, 18 May 2025 (EST)

long time no see

hi there, i've returned from a break and am ready to add more gadgets/make more administrative/interface changes. could i please have those rights back? thanks — Jackson • DEWOTT WON! 16:35, 18 May 2025 (EST)

user rights

remove User:Stonetoss's rollback permission CoblonDisciple (talk) 14:59, 19 May 2025 (EST)

xir

this IP needs to be censored https://soyjakwiki.org/index.php?title=Special:Log&logid=99008 Cobblestone (talk) 02:38, 21 May 2025 (EST)

are mediators considered staff here?

CoblonDisciple (talk) 04:09, 21 May 2025 (EST)

Not really, in the case of Soyjak wiki:Staff, if you're considering adding mediators to that. That page is considered a directory for making reports to jannies.

Not in the same way as higher ranks, because they can't ban users and protect pages, which is usual jannywork when users report something. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 14:17, 21 May 2025 (EST)

i gave approvers/rollbackers the mediator badge specifically because they have a very small amount of power, while jannies can janny. — Jackson • DEWOTT WON! 15:38, 21 May 2025 (EST)

Hello

In addition to making gape a helper, you could make CoblonDisciple an approver. He is very active and is already a rollbacker. Unless you think he's too new of course. Cobblestone (talk) 22:18, 21 May 2025 (EST)

Some questions for new features for the 'ki

Could you add the reply tool and the new topic tool from current Wikipedia to the 'ki? Also i saw that you're changing the MonoBook background, maybe change it to something more muted, like some jaks at the top and it fades to white as you scroll down Cobsonant (talk) 10:25, 24 May 2025 (EST)

i can add DiscussionTools or algous (nevermind i thought it was a gadget) — Jackson • DEWOTT WON! 10:27, 24 May 2025 (EST)

i'll email quote about it — Jackson • DEWOTT WON! 10:28, 24 May 2025 (EST)

Done (the bg) Cobblestone (talk) 10:43, 24 May 2025 (EST)

can i get a higher up role

i've been here for 2 years and never vandalized (probably)

made many gemmy pages like math, contour integration gemmed up tranny page and india made spategate made operation sturdy

and others i'm forgetting

can i get something higher than rollback

please? pretty please? i'll suck ur dick

Okay, since you want it a lot and you aren't a coaler. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 04:33, 27 May 2025 (EST)

>giving actual spergs approver

Shut it down CoblonDisciple (talk) 04:50, 27 May 2025 (EST)

>spergs le bad because they just are okay?

vandalizing user page is sharty culture doe

>vandalizing

I don't judge users' capabilities based on apparent mental health. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 06:28, 27 May 2025 (EST)

you did vandalize my user page though --Broot (talk) 04:45, 27 May 2025 (EST)

MEDS I AM NOT CRAZY YOU SHITALALLALALALALALARYAN NEEDSFSDFS T ODIE OFF BECAUES YOU ARE A FUCKING COALER HTAT BROOT NEEDS TO AND HE--

guidelines for approval

what do i approve and what do i not approve doe?

if someone adds a non vandalizing edit, do i allow it or not

like :

some guy adds to the troonslop page some random video game

do i add it or not

some guy went on the page for schlog namefags and added aryan on the name of the namefags. approve or no?

Soyjak Wiki:Approver policy only reject rulebreaking edits, vandalism (maliciously rewording or deleting paragraph(s) for no reason), bad splinter links, or edits that are way too ESL/break the page/break images. Cobblestone (talk) 06:23, 27 May 2025 (EST)

If it doesn't detract from the quality of the page, approve it. In other words, approve constructive edits, reject destructive edits. Also refer to Cobblestone's comment above.

P.S: In that particular case the edit's not very constructive but it isn't destructive either. Either choice works, but it's approvable. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 06:25, 27 May 2025 (EST)

test SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 07:02, 31 May 2025 (EST)

why was gem control banned?

why was gem control banned?

I checked his page but it just said he was banned for ban evasion (recursive logic fallacy doe)

what was he originally banned for doe?

not my talkpage but he got banned cuz he wanted to report the 'ru to adsense and registrar to get it taken down Cobblestone (talk) 15:11, 27 May 2025 (EST)

okay i read the page but i'm still confused, why did he do it? he was a good 'ki editor. why did he make alt accounts and try to get it reported? this is so confusing. i remember that guy..... zamn

He was already planning on quitting, or at least he said he was. At the start of '25, he became obsessed with schlog namefags and ran a psyop on quite a few of them, mainly steve and mist. His main account "retired" while his other accounts would make the gayops. He would also use his janny permissions to unban himself, approve his own edits, etc. until they were taken away.

A few months back, M2 was worded a little differently, and I got tired of people using many alt accounts, especially to run personal psyops. I saw it as abuse. Whenever I saw this, I banned the alts but let them keep one account with a tempban. Besides Gem Control, I did the same thing to one other person.

I ACKed Gem Control's alts and banned his main account for one week, because I saw his psyops as hyperobsessed and abuse of alts. Then, Gem Control 'itty 'eaked and tried to ACK the 'ru. As you can imagine, this is egregious to the ownership if they find out. He kept notes of this on schlog, so quote discovered the plan and permabanned him.

I wish the best for Gem Control and his IRL activities. Otherwise, it's probably best for him to quit the Soysphere, like he said he would, or take a break then appeal his previous ban.

I hope these walls of text clear the story up. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 22:07, 27 May 2025 (EST)

Narratable articles

Does mediawiki have the spoken article function from wikipedia? You know the one that allows editors to make audios of articles being read? I think it would be cool to let 'teens that aren't ESL or have bad mics to narrate articles if they want to. --Broot (talk) 13:04, 7 June 2025 (EST)

I have been thinking about it recently. I've never seen narrated articles here, but implementation seems simple: wikipedia:Template:Spoken_Wikipedia. Just a template. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 13:26, 7 June 2025 (EST)

Email

Hello sproke, I've sent you an email. --Broot (talk) 15:31, 10 June 2025 (EST)

I'll reapond later... SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 17:27, 10 June 2025 (EST)

The NAS Question

As the wiki grows, more people seek to write about things that interest them that aren't really related to 'jaks. We kind of permit them through the NAS template except for the most egregious cases, and certain topics like countries enjoy de-facto deletion immunity.

We are not ED, but for better or for worse, this wiki is seen by some as the successor to ED and this kind of holds true once you compare our Special:Statistics with theirs. Should we allow editors more freedom by making the NAS rule even more lax or should we stand firm on our founding principles? Cobblestone (talk) 17:53, 10 June 2025 (EST)

I do believe certain articles, such as raids, should be contained in one page. I've also been annoyed with NAS, but we've let certain articles exist under the "MARGE, WHY DOES THIS PAGE EXIST" category, which otherwise have no reason to exist, except that they might be fun. I'm not sure what to do with those. I'll get to this later.

For now, as long as it has anything to do with soyjaks or the sharty, it's permissible somewhere, unless there's extreme controversy or something else. SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 18:35, 10 June 2025 (EST)

Okay, I see. Thanks for the response. Cobblestone (talk) 19:11, 10 June 2025 (EST)

heads up

hey, i got a notification about the email but i can't read the full thing due to cock.li being down rn — Jackson • DEWOTT WON! 11:43, 11 June 2025 (EST)

i know it sounds inconvenient especially coming from me but could you message me on nuschlog — Jackson • DEWOTT WON! 11:44, 11 June 2025 (EST)

Okay. the .com one. --SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 11:45, 11 June 2025 (EST)

yea — Jackson • DEWOTT WON! 11:48, 11 June 2025 (EST)

new email

send any future emails to jackson@soyjakblog.com since cock.li is an unreliable piece of shit — Jackson • DEWOTT WON! 16:28, 11 June 2025 (EST)

Should we unban the soyjak forum page?

The shroom has become relevant enough and received booru posts almost exclusively due to the actions of jimbo. Froot who ordered the ban originally is gone and I doubt Quote would care enough to keep the page banned, plus the site itself isn't hostile nor conducts spam on the sharty, so it feels disingenuous to keep it blocked when much worse get pages. At most, if people oppose, we can add the page without linking to the forum itself. - Editor (talk) 18:41, 11 June 2025 (EST)

I'll ask Quote directly. Cobblestone (talk) 19:01, 11 June 2025 (EST)

Quote gave me the OK. Cobblestone (talk) 09:38, 12 June 2025 (EST)

Removal of "le unfair" doxes?

Some doxes are on people who haven't really done stuff that bad and they are just a result of unwholesome chuds from froot era (or before) doxing some literal who just because they made adult content content that isn't EPI Quote seems to be against that so I figured I'd propose it here Ilovy (talk) 13:48, 15 June 2025 (EST)

Doxing isn't exclusively an instrument of vigilante justice. I don't see the line of reasoning behind your proposal. Could you list some examples? SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 18:25, 15 June 2025 (EST)

Thing

I've written this. Soyjak Wiki:Template manual of style. Feel free to amend or add to it. Cobblestone (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2025 (EST)

It's a good guide. Brevity is the soul of wit. SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 18:21, 15 June 2025 (EST)

Yeah

thanks for redpilling me on antifandom i've never touched the main laggy shithole since --Broot (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2025 (EST)

updoot or something SprokemowerMan ● Talk Page 16:02, 19 June 2025 (EST)

i'd like your judgement on this topic

check it out and the thread archive too Template_talk:Failtroll Cobblestone (talk) 15:40, 19 June 2025 (EST)

GET

>creating a useless section just to get the 100 section GET on sproke's userpage so he can archive the talkpage

look at the section above this Cobblestone (talk) 15:43, 19 June 2025 (EST)