hi add more pages on marge footer cuz most missing like pepe graphics card snca:source and other okey thank u janytor
Coal and bad pages
coal needs to split
coal pages(aka pages that need improving or fixing) and pages about topics that are coal should have smth else cuz im tryna fix pages and theres just a gorgillion pages that are just about bad topics and pages that could be gems if improved o algo also took da liberty to cull the useless/ended topicsβ Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki editor (talk β’ contribs)
The coal template already used to have two variants (one for calling the topic coal, one for calling the wiki page coal) but that was axed due to potential confusion and the Gradingcaust where Cobblestone decided that the wiki doesn't really need templates just to say whether a given topic is good or bad, both to encourage independent thought and actually writing about the subject in question instead of just saying "it's le good" or "it's le bad". Not to mention that anything obviously bad enough to be near unanimously considered coal by the soysphere would already naturally make it clear from the article itself without needing a template.
Besides, there's already plenty of maintenance templates that do a better job at indicating that an article has problems by actually pointing out specific problems with the article, instead of vaguely saying that the article is coal. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 05:02, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
ranking and quantity over quality
rank people by how many bits they add to pages and not how many edits they do and thatll make people finish or make pages than fix tiny nigger grammars to farm instead of hunt β Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki editor (talk β’ contribs) who is a nusoi that doesn't know that it's proper reddiquitte to sign your posts in talk pages with 4 tildes (~~~~)
>let's reward people for dumping huge walls of text, inefficient formatting, AI slop, and spam onto der key
its just a ranking you dont even get anything for placing in the top 50 bro it literally doesnt matter kek do nusois really NiggerIsraelRape (talk) 08:21, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
you're a 2025caca, quit trying to call your betters "nusois". plus the wiki already has enough walls of text without granting e-peen measuring points based on raw bit count, especially when it's far easier and faster to paste in a million bytes per article than it is to make a lot of edits without janny tools. besides the current e-peen measuring leaderboard is perfectly fine as is GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 08:44, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
>let's reward people for dumping huge walls of text, inefficient formatting, AI slop, and spam onto der key
This nigger has almost 3k edits, does it for free, leaks on the soywoahjack wiki and is a furfaggot while pushing 30 KEK are all oldtroons this mindraped JSID at this point NiggerIsraelRape (talk) 06:50, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
other quotecord images also do have, just check the upload 'log ~Chud57832 (talk) 14:29, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
I marked them for deletion G-Man (talk) 14:32, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
North removed the exif data from it, so its fine FenririsπΊ 06:35, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
>Current mission (for all AllPageEdit editors)
i think there should be another current mission for people without allpageedit perms, also there's still a bunch of leftover empty OTDs doebeit GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 07:15, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
nobaldi was doing them so i gave up, i'll do them later myself i think Cobblestone (talk) 10:57, 4 May 2026 (UTC)
wiki happenings
what about wiki happenings page? Gzard (talk) 16:06, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
and i thought that with limeade gone we were allowed to post the domains of hostile splinters, as long as theyre not pedophilic Greenfag (talk) 23:39, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
it's filled with failtrolls G-Man (talk) 23:40, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
Same with fooey though Gzard (talk) 01:17, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
No. The problem with posting the domains of hostiles is that other teens will discover them and become hostile themselves, causing attacks from the outside in. I am pretty sure it was already like this all over the soysphere even when the FDL was in control FenririsπΊ 00:01, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
alright good to know, thanks! Greenfag (talk) 00:02, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Are perspective pages really necessary? (aka: Detractor perspectives (detractor perspective))
In recent soystory there's been a growing number of perspective articles made and deleted on this site. The most common variety of these is "detractor perspectives", which fully shift away from the wiki's usual goal of documenting things with independently fact checked and peer reviewed information in favor of just trashing the subject in question, deserved or otherwise. The problems with those are that they're usually just the original article with more template spam, a negative tone, and anything positive about the subject removed, which isn't helpful for the wiki's purpose and let's be honest articles like those belong on the site best known for those, Encyclopedia Dramatica. Another issue is the problem with information drift between a base article and its perspective(s), from having to edit the same information onto multiple articles every time a new thing worth updating them for happens, to say nothing of stuff being added to one page only because the editor in question only supports one perspective or because it wouldn't fit on the other perspective page.
There's also occasionally supporter perspective articles which are just the same as detractor perspectives except they're more positive than the base article with everything negative being removed or rewritten.
Anyways cobblestone please delete everything I dislike (the perspectives not in sub-categories can stay though since they're funny and have actual identities beyond just being "what if someone who really disliked X subject wrote an article on X subject") GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 05:55, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
>Preceding unsigned comment added by GauntletThrown (talk β’ contribs)β Preceding unsigned comment added by GauntletThrown (talk β’ contribs)
Keep them because they act like containments for clitty leakage and allow the main page to stay relatively neutral Cobblestone (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
sis forgot she could block people from specific pages :skull: :skull: GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 09:12, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
NOOOOOO YOU CANT JUST MAKE PAGES I DONT LIKE BECAUSE.... YOU JUST CANT, OK CHUD? Neptune 22:45, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
COBOOOOT PLS ADD TEMPLATE LIST TO NAVIGATION SECTION OF SIDEBAR FOR EASY ACCESS
Create a userscript for that nigga Fart (talk) 12:52, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
Limeaids is gone so bring thst page back odk what was on it which is why I'm not the one reviving it o algo β Preceding unsigned comment added by YmirChud (talk β’ contribs)
I think he meant Kuz (North's perspective) G-Man (talk) 22:39, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
Not too sure tbh, on one hand it was him just leaking as he normally does and cant do whatever he wants anymore, but on the other hand that page is a giga stub. Maybe if somoene is willing to make it into an actual article FenririsπΊ 22:57, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
this is more about the booru,but am i allowed to post nas if it is my self insert? lets say i have a uh soysona thats like a cartoony uh dart i dont know,am i allowed to post it as long as its my soysona? i saw poodlespoodles do it a lot on the booru before he got raped Funnierman (talk) 21:18, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Yes, you can post your soysona on the 'ki, I seen alot of teens already do so. As long as you actually use it somewhere otherwise it will get deleted FenririsπΊ 21:26, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
template revival
i liked the "this is really bad" template made in march however it was poorly executed in a sense so i made this one though maybe its not better cuz its just an image with a player but either way maybe this would revive the template pls accept Nigge (talk) 15:39, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
this is what i made
I don't think this template can be revived since nusois would spam this on every single article ever that made their clitty leak it feels. γ MarketPliers (leak here) 18:00, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
that and anything actually really bad does not need a template to spell it out GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 00:31, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
>DUE TO THE FACT THAT
jannies, please replace every instance of >due to the fact that with >because. >due to the fact that is a terrible phrase only used by high school students trying to extend the word count of their essay. there is absolutely zero reason for >due to the fact that to be used on this wiki. Greenfag(Talk) 23:18, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
>due to the fact that is funny though. Its like though; though FenririsπΊ 00:29, 24 May 2026 (UTC)
Add a new abuse filter that results in a warning when trying to insert archive.today links
In this year it has been revealed that archive.today is rather sketchy. It is being investigated by the FBI, the site used its CAPTCHA to perform a DDoS attack against a blog that made the owner leak and there is evidence of the site tampering with archives.
I would not like the insertion of new archive.today links to be blocked entirely like on Wikipedo due to its ability to bypass paywalls, but instead inserting new archive.today links should result in an ignorable warning telling 'teens to use Ghostarchive or Megalodon instead. GapeNewell (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
>This action would involve the insertion of an archive.today link, which is not recommended due to the site being investigated by the FBI, the site misusing its captcha to DDoS sites, and potential tampering with archives. While using it isn't against the rules, it's recommended to use ghostarchive.org or megalodon.jp instead. If using an archive.today link is intentional, you may submit your edit again.
There's some good warning text for the filter. Qoot/coboot can edit it as necessary GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 22:09, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Honestly, I would but I feel like putting that warning whenever an user tries to edit would be too annoying FenririsπΊ 20:26, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
There is a "added text" variable on Abuse Filter, it should prevent what you're talking about. GapeNewell (talk) 20:29, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Alright, done FenririsπΊ 20:52, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
your user talk page is still locked only to administrators. Niggaballs (xe larped as if he was quitting the soysphere) Gzard (talk) 19:04, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
probably wants to lie low until people forget about a certain irc screenshot Neptune 19:22, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
the 'ru used to write blocks of text about snca over which country was whiter than the other, now they are all furpedos. why are they like this now? TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
he's one of ours doe, can't blame this on the 'ru Neptune 19:31, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
This is not the place to discuss vooey falseflags. γ MarketPliers (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
Also worth mentioning that xis alt or offsite (probably 'cord) buttbuddy on an automoderated account (User: Xyz y) made the exact same vandal edit with a very similar edit reason, so not only is xe gonna eat a ban for vandalism but xe's getting another ban for ban evasion/being a member of a hostile offsite community willing to vandalize pages on the ki. JSTFD (just shut the fooey down) already! GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 08:15, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
I've already explained it in the article's talk page, Peanut and me are the same person. I only made the account because i didn't really want to use this one as i just kind of retired from the wiki and the 'sphere altogether. My intent wasn't to vandalize the page and i apologize if it seemed so. You also seem to be oddly upset at this[it just is, ok?]. Xyz y (talk) 08:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC) <nusoi that puts xis signature on a new line
get fucked nigger Gzard (talk) 08:48, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
User:Peanut we already banned you once for that exact reason, so that should not be an excuse. That one day ban should of served as more than enough of an warning. Sorry, not buying it. But since it already been so long since appropriate moderation has been taken regarding this, I guess I could just let you off with an warning for now since you seem remorseful and did not actually harm anything thanks to the moderation queue. Next time when removing content like that, it would help if you explained why in your change log. Thanks! FenririsπΊ 12:25, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
It was a one-day ban? I thought it was permanent. I should've just waited it out. My bad. Xyz y (talk) 03:23, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
I think the Gradingcaust was a good thing for the most part, but I don't understand why the iron template was removed. I'd say at least half of the articles on the 'ki aren't coals or gems, they're basically the equivalent of a B-class article on the 'pedia. One could argue that not placing an article in either category implies it's iron, but I think it would be clearer to add the template back. Codex (talk) 15:12, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Iron was removed because it was pointless filler, since its usecase would apply to anything that isn't sufficiently gemmy or coally to have the gem or coal templates (or their more extreme reskins), and if a page has neither template then there's probably reasons why neither template is on there (or not enough reasons to have one of them in the first place). This is the same reason a lot of templates that were just oppositefagged versions of another template got axed; because the inverted versions of the original templates in question would just be entirely unremarkable and standard things.
To put it in another way; if a template isn't present on a page then it either doesn't exhibit the associated quality enough to warrant one of the few template slots being used in it, or because it doesn't meet the requirement(s) for it (nor the requirement(s) for an opposite template like gem/coal, if applicable) and thus the template wouldn't be fitting anyways.
TL;DR: The iron quality is already implied by everything that isn't marked as a gem or coal thing, so having a template for it wouldn't be telling anyone anything new or important. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 14:44, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
They're technically interchangeable as per Merriam-Webster, but we should probably pick one and start enforcing it. I've seen both spellings used in several articles and it's just fucking stupid. Codex (talk) 19:25, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Can there be a guideline to rename booru image files before uploading them, for example "File:73883 - SoyBooru.png" to "Muscular chud minion.png"? This should make files easier to find (and possibly prevent dupe uploads); even with tags in the filename, it's usually pretty difficult to find a specific image. Neptune 21:31, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
it would be hard to enforce Cobblestone (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
true. I added a section to the manual of style which will hopefully help tho Neptune 19:24, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
>Main Page smells like baitGzard (talk) 11:17, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
faux language text font
a faux font is a font that stylizes latin characters to mimic a foreign (non-latin) alphabet. in other words, it could stylize english text to appear as if it were written in another language (but still legible).
it would work in a similar way to the font used in the troonjak page title. could be used for anything: from headers, footers, to article text, even user badges. for example, every muslim country page has it's title written with an "pseudo-arabic" font.
i have to say, i don't know how would i implement this as a template/.css, nor if i can do this/it's going to last forever, so i'm writing this to know how would you jannies receive this, and if it's a good idea.
please note that i recognize how visually polluted (and illegible) it would look if a whole page used said font(s) + it would start a template spam war over what font fits better, and whether the font fits the country's culture. i'd recommend to add fonts that fits a whole continent/sphere (e.g. middle east countries has some arabic-looking font; slavic countries, pseudo-cyrillic; asian countries, asianesque font; etc.), but it shouldn't apply for countries whose language use the latin alphabet (doesn't apply for the americas, western europe, africa, and oceania).
That page is doomed no matter what, we really shouldn't stop users from expressing their opinions either. All we can do is remind users about the manual of style and that threadfagging isn't allowed. I'll keep an eye out for repeat offenders. γ MarketPliers (talk) 15:28, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
I'm seconding the idea of locking it to people who've at least been around long enough to get autoconfirmed, which should filter out the truly brainless while still being open enough to contributions. Still I don't like how the Chudslop page was such a mess in regards to fontspam, threadfagging, ESL writing, and blatant miscategorization that I had to stick an acktung banner with attention grabbing text at the top of it. Also it had 3 separate entries for Minecraft because nusois can't ctrl + f. GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 16:13, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
you guys seriously LOVE ruining anything that isn't quotecord namefag snca drama TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 16:55, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
>you guys seriously LOVE ruining anything that isn't quotecord namefag snca drama
xaar keeping articles clean is not ruining it, go back to ED or encyclopedia if you genuinely want articles to look like shit GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 16:59, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
the shitflinging was the only thing keeping the page out of becoming another generic clittycel list, jesus fucking christ no wonder why you want to start another gradingcaust TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 17:10, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
ad hominem + if your only argument for keeping a page a mess is because it being a mess is le sovl then the page deserves to be purged GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 17:13, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
stop trying to control everything, nowadays every single damn decision even if it's completely unrelated to administration has to be decided by the joons. why is this wiki so boring now? TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 17:23, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
>another generic clittycel even doe it always was it, just multiple clittycels. the amount of threadfagging shows it Gzard (talk) 17:42, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
hi janjans
just wanted to stop by and say hello. Aryan_warrior aka MINT(User page) (talk) 17:03, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
why is in BSD the text is twice the size what marge it wasnt like that Nigge (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
Commenting out the gigachad template then reverting that edit seemed to fix it on my machine GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 20:27, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
protect please
Protect the Soylita page to autoconfirmed just to be sure that jartypedos won't try to edit it like User:Negro tried to do from one of his alts Gzard (talk) 11:10, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
4737 needs his own page
4737 decided to leak his clitty and ruin a soyduel because I posted a SLF gif with the fucking UTTP cop or something and he just 'aped my IP thinking I'm an offsiter without any hesitation. I definitely think he deserves a page for just how leaky he really gets. I'm not even a newfag, for crying out loud! β Preceding unsigned comment added by Ezpetten26 (talk β’ contribs)
>he deserves a page for just how leaky he really gets that's rich coming from the guy who deleted a GET because he didn't like it Statis (talk) 16:16, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
>calling someone leaky when you're leaking over getting bannedyou're already 'nished but i hope you know deep down that you're a retardGlisterald (talk) 18:45, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
HTSM Inquiry
is there any specific bad reason why HTSM stopped being called "hunky tunky twink sex machine?" Can I add its old name to the page, or is it like fuggen embedded with some bad meaning so it can't be 'chived? ~ Spruceπ² (talk) 23:30, 14 June 2026 (UTC)
can we trade perspective pages for bringing back the grading template
grading templates were, a vast majority of the time, at least somewhat funny which perspective pages aren't because they're just snca seething brimstone pages made by clitty leaky htsms Zinc (user page) 02:27, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
edit war
fags are edit warring the cobblestone picture on Cobblestone do something ~ Spruceπ² (talk) 15:50, 15 June 2026 (UTC)
you may have seen my thread above about langauge-themed fonts. i've uploaded File:Kanisah.otf, which looks like the Jude text in the yellow badge thing or something. however, there seems to be two issues in implementing it: the file page says it contains malicious code, and i can't create the template page for it. what to do now?
It can probably only be implemented by cobble as that has to be added to MediaWiki:common.css to function properly as was done with Troonlibri γ MarketPliers (talk) 14:08, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
can i add stuff? im jordanian so it would help, ill try me best not to get biasedβ Preceding unsigned comment added by ~Chud55891 (talk β’ contribs)
The fix suggested in the template talkpage is already implemented so I'm not sure what you're on about. γ MarketPliers (talk) 10:55, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
yea an hour after I wrote this... SoyQualityControl (talk) 00:02, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
adding pictograms for infoboxes
if you see this article's infobox, you'll see there is a pictogram of a wholesome helicopter on its title box. I'd suggest to do the same thing with our infoboxes. Note that the icon itself should not depend on the infobox template (like what pictogram do you use for a concept in Template:Infobox concept???), instead just make a separate template or styles.css. English wikipedia does not have a guide, but the french and portuguese ones does.
I noticed some inconsistency regarding the hoax template. I believe it should only be used on fictional websites, wars, and happenings (e.g. soyjak.gov and Pre-Soot era), and not on actual articles like Terry Davis. Even if it were funny, it causes confusion since I've been away from a while and couldn't tell hoaxes from reality. --Gem (talk) 14:56, 22 June 2026 (UTC) 14:56, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Not sure why that template was spammed on so many pages but yes it's intended use is to be on pages which contain untrue info. γ MarketPliers (talk) 16:33, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
My guess is that it gets confused for {{Joke}} which is supposed to be used for articles that are shitposty/meant to be funny over being 100% encyclopedic but I don't think that needs a template because any sufficiently funny article will have its humor be obvious without a template anyways, and templates that need the Joke template to explain that they're humorous aren't funny enough in the first place. I'd probably cut the Joke template and edit the Hoax template's documentation to clarify that it's meant for pages/sections about entirely fictional subjects only GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 17:10, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
Even if this page wasn't a total DNB, it wouldn't have any use. Anyone that wants to request a page can make it, assuming that it gets approved. It was also made by an incestous 'cord troon, which doesn't exactly help its case. HewlettBraptard (talk) 07:08, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
this, plus there's already an automated requested page list in Special:WantedPages, a list of all pages that don't exist but have red links to them and thus could exist according to an editor (unless the link target is just misspelled) GauntletThrown (clittyleakage zone) 09:19, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
lock the trump page for autoconfirmed
edit warring niggerhell Gzard (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
All content (except for media) on this wiki is within public domain, meaning you are free to copy it, redistribute it, or rape it however you like. --Gem (talk) 08:28, 25 June 2026 (UTC) 08:28, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
>NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!! HOW DARE THE HECCIN' ANTI-FURFAGS MAKE FUN OF MY HIV-POZZED FAGGOT FURKIKE FRIEND THAT I GROOMED!TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 12:53, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Any reasonable person could look at the two gallery screenshots and see how they were being overblown and twisted into something untrue. The microwave joke got moved into it's relevant section. Keep seething, it's funny. γ MarketPliers (talk) 13:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
no, having a microwave fetish isn't "being overblown and twisted into something untrue", furfag. TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 13:07, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
No one has a "microwave fetish", any reasonable person would see that as a joke. Take your meds. γ MarketPliers (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
those "any reasonable people" are you and your cordbuddies, also how are we supposted to trust you since you were involved with the entire thing, corrupt monkey? TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
There is an entire article explaining how most gooning "jokes" and "bait" are forced by 'corders and unironic gooners. Gooning to microwaves is certainly a very normal "joke" in a website full of TND threads, countrywars, namefag battles, and raids. Sure! Its so funny, look Im gonna "joke" too! BBC is better than BWC! hahahahaha so funny right totally not EPI guys! TheCatalan1977 (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Why would "a reasonable person" only refer to my friends? It's a widely understood concept to mean a neutral third party. I understand that you're upset, and that I have a conflict of interest in this situation, and I'll happily unlock the page if we can have a neutral third party mediate this. γ MarketPliers (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
so "a reasonable person" would think a fetish joke definitely isn't cordbait? what the fuck is your logic? TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 13:20, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
I do think that a reasonable person would think it is in fact an innocuous, silly joke. γ MarketPliers (talk) 13:25, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
yeah, "silly and innocuous" by trannies like you. stop trying to make this site like wikipedia. TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 13:28, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
You literally cant be neutral on a topic regarding furfags because you are one. Your own page states it. Of course you think that "sharty culture is when furfags with swastikas". And we all have seen your "neutrality". Dismissing EXPLICIT AND PROVEN EVIDENCE, that I didnt make up, I researched unlike your pathetic "research" (which led you to say dumb shit like SNCAPedia still existing despite the tor link being down). It's on his booru pages, if you want a sharty furry space, hey... Averi.foo exists... duhhh. You use "neutral" as a word to deflect to try demoralize me into thinking im biased, even though I even reverted an edit that implied grooming because it was false, while your neutrality was just some templates "hahahaha irony guys we mock each other too just like you", but here's the thing. TEMPLATES, slurs, are meaningless. It's an obviously biased page that paints his exposing as a "swinny SNCAPedia plot" (even though by that logic North was an hostile offsiter since he used that garbage splinter wiki too). Please, seek God. I pray for you. Amen TheCatalan1977 (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
I already said my changes had a conflict of interest. I do not believe your changes were made in good faith and that you were intentionally misrepresenting loose evidence to further your own interests. γ
i think you just suck as a mediator because why do you care about this guy who has not posted in a few weeks? approve my edits.IronEcho (talk) 13:23, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
You can say its misrepresenting but you cannot prove its false with empirical evidence. If it was truly false, you would have already presented evidence. But here's the thing, its true, so "repeat a lie a hundred times and it becomes truth". It's not worth discussing this any further since you will obviously defend your gooning cave of furfags. End. "Replied too late award." TheCatalan1977 (talk) 13:29, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
How is this screenshot "empirical evidence" of North being sent "suggestions sent by his friends to ask for vore watching sessions". First off, this is just some random email he received, if he cared about it not leaking why would he screenshot it and share it? Secondly, where did you get the idea from this screenshot that North has vore porn to begin with? Thirdly, where did you get the idea that he watched vore porn together with other users? This point is a complete fabrication because nowhere in the email is that even hinted towards, it's just something you made up. Then there's this, this is clearly him just answering another user that they were in fact talking about e621isourhomeland, not that North uses e621 like you claimed. γ MarketPliers (talk) 13:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
>I already said my changes had a conflict of interest.
I said that intentionally because it is the truth? γ MarketPliers (talk) 13:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Accidentally admited xhe's biased award TheCatalan1977 (talk) 13:30, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
furcacas cannot stop losing, back then niggers like marketpliers would've been demoted instantly. TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 13:32, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
times change oldsoi, this is a furCHAD EPI website now. --Gem (talk) 13:33, 25 June 2026 (UTC) 13:33, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Are you mentally ill? Empirical evidence is shit you can only find via experiments bro is just saying shitIronEcho (talk) 13:34, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
lolkike how was it when you were admin on der 'ru TraisoRightsWonned (talk) 13:36, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Old toilet showed up and bro starting bowingIronEcho (talk) 13:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Sir I have noticed a critical error in your judgement, "geniunely" is not a real word. May you please clarify what you meant by this? Thank youIronEcho (talk) 15:39, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Again, this happened in the furcord, not the boorum. You can tell by the lack of post numbers. This has been public info for more than a month, who actually cares at this point. γ MarketPliers (talk) 15:48, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Yeah fuck trannypliers, no one likes this nigger Gzard (talk) 15:57, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Still this doesn't stop the fact that everyphono on the 'sphere who knows about you hates you. You're doing worse than the jimbo or gillkoyim. Just step down and it'll settle down Gzard (talk) 16:11, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Guys, please stop. I hate to see you all fight :( FenririsπΊ 16:09, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
keep calm nuswas, he'll eventually will be sent to niggerhell along side his clique just like gill. stop being baited by this porn addicted faggot --Silohpso (talk) 16:33, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Depressing to think the sharty went from banning furfaggotry, raiding furfags and gooners, to literal gooners and furfags being jannies, that post stuff like this https://soybooru.com/post/view/182923. One day we will look back at this era and see how we almost became a jerdee splinter TheCatalan1977 (talk) 16:56, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Not reading allat, but just wanted to say: fuck niggers. Neptune 18:00, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
We are becoming the fucking jarty.
Btw HTSM was created by 'cord failtrolls trying to demoralize soyteens by mocking them for opposing troonslop and furfaggotry in order to introduce it here. Thanks for proving your only interest in the 'sphere is to force your fur fetishes. Also about the "joke". Same argument with coomers: "its funny cuz its EPI". TheCatalan1977 (talk) 18:02, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Marge, I am not an furry though. Also, when did I force anything? I'm on the sphere cause its fun. Your the HTSM FenririsπΊ 19:36, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
>Btw HTSM was created by 'cord failtrolls trying to demoralize soyteens by mocking them for opposing troonslop and furfaggotry in order to introduce it here. Thanks for proving your only interest in the 'sphere is to force your fur fetishes. Also about the "joke". Same argument with coomers: "its funny cuz its EPI".
What if I look like this and say this, what then? TheCatalan1977 (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
Pony
Woaw i can make posts on this page that's so cool -Paranoid (talk)
Its not really supposed to be an place for posting doe. Discussions really FenririsπΊ 17:17, 25 June 2026 (UTC)