Current mission: go through Category:ESL and fix the ESL or remove the template if the page isn't ESL anymore.

Walkable city

From Soyjak Wiki, the free ensoyclopedia
(Redirected from Walkable cities)
Jump to navigationJump to search
*tap tap tap* uhhhh there's an obsessed yuropoor looking at me through this glass or something like that, yeah

Shart on every page revision for AMERICAN TRVMP-GIVEN PATRIQTIC TRVTH or whatever.

>DRIVABLE. SUBURBS. NOW!
>WALKABLE. APARTMENTS. NOW!
Walkable cities are (((Jewish))).
fake 'toss made by a projecting carcuck

Walkable cities, also known as leakable clitties, are cities designed for walking rather than driving. It's an idea pushed by a relatively new form of soyim called Urbanists, whose main goal in life is to BTFO the heckin' American imperialists who partake in suburban lifesyle. Their most well-known "organization" and breeding ground is a single Youtube channel called Notjustbikes, but most of them can be found hanging around internet comment sections, larping as Europeans who are shocked at how car-centered American cities are.

Although it is true that being forced to drive everywhere with no fast alternative in urban environments is kind of shitty, what the 14 year old ESL driver's license-less children who comprise 95% of urbanists fail to recognize is that America's car-centric environment was naturally and collectively created by white people to get away from Africans and other minorities, and that most white people would prefer driving in a traffic jam alone in their air-conditioned cars than having to sit next to a smelly brownoid on a train or something.

Another thing urbanists don't recognize is how spread out and low-density most American cities already are. Even if you built a bunch of public housing developments towards the downtown, most people live on private HOA developments on square-mile blocks, with the streets within the developments being all curly with cul-de-sacs and whatnot and not on a grid-pattern where it'd be easier to rezone detached houses into apartment buildings. This makes it basically impossible to replace suburban developments into something heckin' walkable (assuming you were able to buy off people's houses for redevelopment anyways which probably isn't gonna happen without 67 thrembillion lawsuits). There are many cases of American cities, such as Denver, that spent billions creating metro lines into suburbs but no one uses them because most people would have to drive to them from the middle of their housing developments anyways unless they wanna walk for 40 minutes in the snow, also Denver's road system is high-capacity enough to where cars are usually faster than trains and walking anyways.

Europe and Japan also have a shit ton of highways and most of their citizens also don't live within 15 minutes walking distance of a train station, further proving the urbanist larp.

You WILL live in apartments. You WILL pay rent. You WILL ride the bus with obese drug addicts. You WILL ride the bike. You will NOT have fun running people over with your car. You will NOT have a nice lawn. You will NOT have privacy.

The Notjustbikes copypasta[edit | edit source]

>Dont you love living in a big metal coffin. I love biking to work and eating ulraprocessed foods in my mega ultra claustrophobic city with no backyards, playgrounds, or room for my children. I love not having a car because it forces me to never leave the city and go other places that my shitty 100 dollar train cant take me. And because I cant bike for more than 1 mile im forced in this super amazing not dytopia non-car city that I LOVE

>Stroads are Ugly, Expensive, and Dangerous (and they're everywhere)
>Why City Design is Important (and Why I Hate Houston)
>Why Dutch Bikes are Better (and why you should want one)
>Why We Won't Raise Our Kids in Suburbia
>These Stupid Trucks are Literally Killing Us
>Why American Cities Are Broke - The Growth Ponzi Scheme
>We Have No Garbage Day in Amsterdam!
>Why Canadians Can't Bike in the Winter (but Finnish people can)
>The Houses that Can't be Built in America - The Missing Middle
>Amsterdam Just Got Awesomer
>The Dumbest Excuse for Bad Cities
>Suburbs that don't Suck - Streetcar Suburbs (Riverdale, Toronto)
>Cities Aren't Loud: Cars Are Loud
>Why Swiss Trains are the Best in Europe
>The Best Country in the World for Drivers
>How Bankrupt American Cities Stay Alive - Debt
>The Lively & Liveable Neighbourhoods that are Illegal in Most of North America
>The Wrong Way to Set Speed Limits
>America Always Gets This Wrong (when building transit)

An analysis of the urbanist mindset[edit | edit source]

The thing about walkable city enthusiasts is that the problem they bring up is not entirely made up.[1] Mutt cities really are shit and having to drive 60+ minutes a day just to go to work is niggerhell. However, what the urbanist does not understand is that the reason people prefer to live in suburban homes is so that they can get away from niggers. Walkable European cities have existed for centuries, but were only possible because of a lack of niggers ruining it; therefore, the only logical praxis to urbanism is to first enact TND.

Also every city is walkable, just use your legs. (You fucking obese nigger)

Urbanist lunacy[edit | edit source]

Things to do in a walkable city[edit | edit source]

What not to do in a walkable city/what to bring[edit | edit source]

How to leave a walkable city[edit | edit source]

If you are planning on leaving a walkable city you need to know 3 things. First off, the train only takes you to more walkable cities, so unless you plan on walking for 18 miles to finally escape to the countryside, you're fucked. Also make sure to You should not leave a walkable city because it is a utopia and is the new sustainable future of the world. It's time to go back to your coffin pod home and enjoy your ultra processed bug burger.

See also[edit | edit source]

Snopes

  1. Those this means these soys are right? OH MY HECKING SCIENCE, WHAT A PLOT-TWIST!!
Walkable city
is part of a series on
Soyience™

Visit the Soyence portal for more.
"We are all just hecking star dust or something!"
Peer reviewed sources [-+]
Fields of science [-+]
Science in praxis [-+]
Theoretical branches [-+]